Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.07s

  • Claim of Caballero v. Fabco Enterprises

    16 N.Y.3d 780 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2011

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Walsh v. Sucrest Corp.

    31 N.Y.2d 751 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1972

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. State

    5 N.Y.3d 327 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2005

    Plaintiffs are not within any of the classes of parties authorized by the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law to challenge *351 the Board’s conduct (see N-PCL 720 [b]). 20 Consequently, they rely on Alco Gravure, Inc. v Knapp … Corp. v Town of Monroe, 1 NY3d 98 [2003]).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Brewster v. . Hatch

    122 N.Y. 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1890

    Brown had acquired for himself and his associates the right to purchase the mining properties within a given time at prices agreed upon. … (Getty v. Devlin, 54 N. Y. 403 ; 70 id. 504 ; Erlanger v. N. S. P. Co., L. R. [3 App. Cas.] 1218; Simons v. V. O. Co., 61 Penn. St. 202; Twycross v. Grant, L. R. [2 C. P. Div.] 503; W. B. C. P. Co. v. Green, L. R. [5 Q.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Welch v. . Bard

    209 N.Y. 304 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1913

    Washington v. Nichols, 52 N. Y. 478 .) … (Chapin v. Ferry, 3 Wash. 386, 397 .)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Claim of Raynor v. Chrysler

    15 N.Y.3d 891 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Little Falls Fibre Co. v. Henry Ford & Son, Inc.

    249 N.Y. 495 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1928

    Company v. … v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Claim of Lieblein v. Charles Chips, Inc.

    28 N.Y.2d 869 · New York Court of Appeals · May 12, 1971

    Determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed, with costs to the respondent board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Gibson.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Fisk v. . Bd. of Educ. of the City of N.Y.

    142 N.Y. 627 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1894

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. City of Schenectady

    97 N.Y.2d 78 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2001

    We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the “narrow remedy” established in Brown v State of New York ( 89 NY2d 172,192 [1996]) cannot be stretched to fit the facts before us. … Edelstein, Life After Brown: The Future of State Constitutional Tort Actions in New York, 42 NYL Sch L Rev 447 [1998]).

    Cited 242 timesPublished
  • In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.

    11 N.Y.2d 310 · New York Court of Appeals · May 17, 1962

    Brown for appellant. Lowell Grosse for respondent. … Bank v. Weigandt , 1 N Y 2d 545; Hartol Prods. Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co. , 290 N.Y. 44 ).

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • People v. . Stephens

    71 N.Y. 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1878

    Gilman, 4 Paige, 58 ; Brown v. Lynch, 1 id., 147 .) … The contracting board alone had power to make the contract, and neither the Canal Board, nor any other board or body had power or responsibility in respect to it.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.

    270 N.Y. 275 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1936

    of examiners which was in force on the fifteenth day of May, nineteen hundred and thirty-two, and the term of eligibility of all open competitive, and promotion eligible lists prepared by the board of examiners of the board … Thereafter the Board of Education ruled that no further appointments may be made from that list until the eligible list of 1928 is exhausted. *279 The appellant challenges the construction which has been placed by the Board

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Crippen v. . Morss

    49 N.Y. 63 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1872

    Y., 3 ; Curtis v. Ayrault, id., 73 .) And had Brown or Chase, the grantors of the defendant, been the owner in severalty of the gristmill property, Lampman v. Milks would have been a controlling authority in this case. … (Adam v. Briggs, etc., supra, 368, 369.)

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Steinberg v. McNab

    25 N.Y.2d 810 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1969

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claim of Guggenheim v. C. Hedke & Co.

    27 N.Y.2d 596 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1970

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Claim of Bran v. Wimbish

    15 N.Y.3d 818 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Onthank v. . L.S. and M.S.R.R. Co.

    71 N.Y. 194 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1877

    (Washburn on Easements, 225, 240; Wynkoop v. Burger, 12 J.R., 222.) And the same rule of construction was applied to the right to lay an aqueduct from a spring, granted in general terms, in Jennison v. … In Bannon v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. Amster

    79 N.Y.2d 592 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1992

    . v Galvin, 36 NY2d 1, 9 ). … Merritt v Weist, supra, at 442; Matter of Graziano v Scalafani, supra, at 665-666).

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Claim of Strauss v. Freiheit

    35 N.Y.2d 780 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1974

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.