Case law

Leone v. Oneida County Sheriff's Department

80 N.Y.2d 850 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1992

Claimant filed a claim with the respondent State Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) and was awarded partial wage replacement benefits for the period of his temporary total disability. … The Appellate Division rejected the County’s argument and unanimously affirmed the Board’s decision ( 166 AD2d 74 ).

Maldini v. Ambro

36 N.Y.2d 481 · New York Court of Appeals · May 8, 1975

(Udell v Haas, 21 NY2d 463, 469 .) … Buchanan v Warley, 245 US 60 ; Dailey v City of Lawton, 425 F2d 1037; Kennedy Park Homes Assn. v Lackawanna, 436 F2d 108, cert den 401 US 1010 ), religion or economic status.

Claim of Reinstein v. Mendola

33 N.Y.2d 589 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1973

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burks, Breitel, Jasen, G-abrielli, Jones and Waohtler.

People v. Buie

86 N.Y.2d 501 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1995

(People v Brown, supra, at 732, n 1 ). … Brown, 80 NY2d 729, 737 , supra; compare, People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513, 518 ; Fisch, op. cit., § 1000, at 576).

Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . Atkinson

74 N.Y. 587 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1878

The case of The National Bank of Commerce v. Merchants’ Nat. Bank ( 1 Otto, 92 ), is cited. … All concur, Rapadlo, J., on authority of The Farmers and Mechanics' National Bank of Buffalo v. Logan: * .

MTR. CHASE MANHATTAN v. State

40 N.Y.2d 590 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1976

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, petitioner Chase Manhattan Bank, as assignee of one Francis Brown, seeks payment of the amount of a judgment in favor of Brown against the State. … Hence, the prior law, which the Official Comment advises has not been substantially changed, required actual notice to the account debtor (see Continental Purchasing Co. v Van Raalte Co., 251 App Div 151, 152).

The People v. Christopher J. Weber

New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 2023

Paramount Pictures Corp., 31 NY3d at 73; Brown v Felson, 442 US 127, 131 [1979]). … Chesterton Co., 15 NY3d 502, 509 [2010]; Wittlinger v Wing, 99 NY2d 425, 433 [2003]; Restrepo v State, 179 AD2d 804, 804 [2d Dept 1992]; Effective Communications West, Inc. v Board of Co-op. Educ.

McGowan v. Eastman

271 N.Y. 195 · New York Court of Appeals · May 19, 1936

Brown January 14, 1936, at New York city. It further directed that defendants produce certain of their records on every occasion of examination of either Brown or Prendergast. … (Chartered Bank of India v. North River Ins. Co., 136 App. Div. 646 ; Searle v. Halstead & Co., 139 App. Div. 134 ; Western Elevating Assn., Inc., v. Chapman, 238 App. Div. 14 .)

MATTER OF MOSHER v. New York State Racing & Wagering Bd.

74 N.Y.2d 688 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1989

The Hearing Officer then determined that petitioner had violated the Board’s rules; he accepted Dr. … The Board adopted the Hearing Officer’s report and confirmed the original 60-day suspension.

People v. Cleague

22 N.Y.2d 363 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1968

Defendant Allen Cleague was jointly indicted with one Henry Brown for burglary in the third degree and petit larceny. The charges against Brown were “ Disposed of ” prior to trial. … However, there was no competent evidence tying the defendant in any way to Brown * , and defendant denied ever having met Brown prior to their arrest.

Lewis v. Young

92 N.Y.2d 443 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 1998

Brown’s] main driveway, running in a generally southwesterly direction between South Ferry Road and [Mr. Brown’s] residence premises.” … Brown’s] residence premises” — would have been superfluous.

Matter of Sherrill v. . O'Brien

188 N.Y. 185 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1907

Since the Constitution of 1894 the case of Matter of Smith v. Board of Supervisors, St. … The general legislative power is absolute and unlimited except as restrained by Constitution. ( Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N.Y. 467 ; People ex rel. McLean v. Flagg, 46 N.Y. 401 .)

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 22 v. New York State Division of Human Rights

35 N.Y.2d 677 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1974

Hopkins at the Appellate Division in Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. *679 No. 2, East Williston v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 42 A D 2d 49, affd. 35 N Y 2d 674; see, also, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v.

New York Post Corp. v. Kelley

296 N.Y. 178 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1947

Act; that thereafter pursuant to request of the Board plaintiff attended at an informal conference together with representatives of Local 471; that the attention of the Board was called to the decision in People v. … Y. 147 ; Rockland Light & Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45 ; Bun & Bradstreet, Inc., v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 ; All American Bus Lines, Inc., v. City of New York, 296 N. Y. 571 ; Booth v.

Maneiro v. Northrup

34 N.Y.2d 963 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1974

Eckhaus v. Adeck Stores, Inc.

11 N.Y.2d 862 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1962

Claim of Guggenheim v. C. Hedke & Co.

27 N.Y.2d 596 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1970

Park v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

155 N.Y. 215 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1898

Inasmuch as the plaintiff and Brown were co-servants this action could not be maintained without showing that Brown was an incompetent man, unfit for the service in ivhich he was engaged, and that such incompetency was known … (Marrinan v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 439 ; Baulec v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 59 N. Y. 356 ; Monahan v. City of Worcester, 150 Mass. 439 ; Gilman v. Eastern R. R. Co., 13 Allen, 433 ; Davis v.

Claim of Caballero v. Fabco Enterprises

17 N.Y.3d 733 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2011

Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.

44 N.Y.2d 568 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1978

In particular, he asserts that plaintiff unduly delayed its purchase of the covering securities and thus failed to "promptly cancel or otherwise liquidate the transaction” as mandated by Federal Reserve Board Regulation T … Brown v Hilton Hotels Corp., 25 AD2d 646 ; Burgin v Ryan, 238 App Div 122 ).