Case law

In the Matter of 9th & 10th Street LLC v. Board of Standards and Appeals of City of Ny

9 N.Y.3d 1019 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

Decker v. . Furniss

14 N.Y. 611 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1856

Brown sells," c., imports of itself an executed sale. … Shaw, 7 Wend., 404 ; Outwater v. Dodge, 7 Cow., 85 ; McDonald v. Hewett, 15 John, 349; Rusk v. Davis . 2 Maul. Sel., 397).

Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance

9 N.Y.3d 312 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2007

Co. v Massre, 14 AD3d 610 [2d Dept 2005]; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Laguerre, 305 AD2d 490 [2d Dept 2003]). . … Ctr. v Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 40 AD3d 984 [2d Dept 2007]; LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 30 AD3d 727 [3d Dept 2006]; Nyack Hosp. v Encompass Ins.

New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Thruway Authority

77 N.Y.2d 86 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1990

C., 43 NY2d 708 ; Tabankin v Codd, 40 NY2d 893 ; People ex rel. Uviller v Luger, 38 NY2d 854 ; see also, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 55, at 254 [rev ed]). … The court discussed the genesis and purpose of article V, § 1 and the enabling legislation creating the Urban Development Corporation.

In THE MATTER OF STEEL LOS III/GOYA FOODS, INC. v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau

9 N.Y.3d 957 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007

9 N.Y.3d 957 (2007) In the Matter of STEEL LOS III/GOYA FOODS, INC., Respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF COUNTY OF NASSAU et al., Appellants, and BETHPAGE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Intervenor-Respondent. … BETHPAGE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Respondents, v. NASSAU COUNTY et al., Appellants, and GOYA FOODS, INC., Respondent. (Matter No. 2.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Submitted October 1, 2007.

Peekskill Suburbs, Inc. v. Morabito

51 N.Y.2d 941 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1980

People Ex Rel. D., L. W.R.R. Co. v. Wildy

262 N.Y. 109 · New York Court of Appeals · May 23, 1933

Co. v. City of Yonkers ( 238 N.Y. 165 , 173 ), we held that an assessment for a street opening, placed upon property used for railroad purposes, was within the jurisdiction of the tax assessors. … Co. v. Van Amburgh, 223 App. Div. 485 ; affd., 251 N.Y. 548 .) Finally, it is quite clear that the portion of the parcel not yet devoted to any railroad purposes derives some measure of benefit from the improvement.

Stettheimer v. . Killip

75 N.Y. 282 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 26, 1878

Brown demanded the sum named and refused to consent to any other terms or conditions. … (Pidcoclc v. Bishop, 3 B. & Cress., 605; Biting v. Bank of U. 8., 11 Wheat., 59 , and cases cited.) There is no pretence of fraud in this case.

Barrett v. . John v. Schaefer, Jr., Company

217 N.Y. 722 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1916

Socha v. Smith

26 N.Y.2d 1005 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1970

Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . Atkinson

74 N.Y. 587 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1878

The case of The National Bank of Commerce v. Merchants’ Nat. Bank ( 1 Otto, 92 ), is cited. … All concur, Rapadlo, J., on authority of The Farmers and Mechanics' National Bank of Buffalo v. Logan: * .

Harris v. Syracuse University

77 N.Y.2d 978 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1991

Matter of Professional Staff Congress-City University of New York v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

7 N.Y.3d 803 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2006

Byrd v. Hall

2 Keyes 646 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1866

In Nichols v. Pinner ( 18 N. … In Brown v. Montgomery ( 20 N.

Reck v. Phenix Insurance

130 N.Y. 160 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1891

Brown, J. … There was evidence that she was seen in October of that year at a place called Pitts Passage, but she was never seen or heard from subsequent to that date, and plaintiff claimed that she was lost on the voyage with all on board

Seiler v. . the People

77 N.Y. 411 · New York Court of Appeals · May 27, 1879

She ivas indicted as a, femme sole, and pleaded, which ivas prima facie evidence that she was unmarried ; (Quinn’s Case, 1 Lewin, 1; Reg. v. Woodward, 8 C. & P., 561.) … If she steal of her own Avill, or by the bare command of her husband or his procurement, she is liable as avcII as he : (Reg. v. Buncombe, 1 Cox C. C., 183; Rex v. Hughes, 1 Buss, on Cr., *22 [41].)

Schmidt v. Falls Dodge, Inc.

19 N.Y.3d 178 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 2012

As we explained in Matter of LaCroix v Syracuse Exec. … Also relying on Miller, a panel of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the Judge’s order and the Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s decision (see Matter of Schmidt v Falls Dodge, Inc., 67 AD3d 1303 [3d Dept 2009

Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.

191 N.Y. 123 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1908

There also should be borne in mind that with us the doctrine has always prevailed tlxat the legislative power is plerxaxy, except as lunited by the Federal and State Constitutions (Bank Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. … McLean v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 ; Lawton v. Steele, 119 N.

Grissler v. . Powers

81 N.Y. 57 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1880

Browning’s representation estopped him from denying its truth, and the effect of the estoppel is not limited to the mere purpose of protecting Powers to the extent of the money which he advanced. The case of Payne v. … The case of Freeman v. Auld ( 44 N. Y. 50 ) gives no support to the appellant’s claim, that a trust in favor of Browning was raised by the transaction in question.

People v. Edelstein

54 N.Y.2d 306 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1981

The sealing requirement is designed, among other things, “to prevent tampering, alterations or editing” (People v Nicoletti, 34 NY2d 249, 253 ). … The tapes from the tap on Brown’s business phone were sealed on Monday, March 21, and the tapes from Brown’s home phone were *310 sealed on the following day.