Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • The People v. Trevor Anderson

    29 N.Y.3d 69 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2017

    When Brown-Gordon turned around and tried to flee, defendant shot him twice more, in the back. … Defense counsel argued at trial that Perez and Brown-Gordon were not credible witnesses and had falsely identified defendant.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • W.N. Clark Company v. Anderson

    288 N.Y. 570 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Erie County Water Authority v. Western New York Water Co.

    304 N.Y. 342 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1952

    v. … (Watson v. Watson, 171 Misc. 175 ; Brown v. Miller, supra: Porter v. Huber, 68 F. Supp. 132 ; see, also, Packer v. Rapoport, 88 N. Y. S. 2d 118, revd. on other grounds 275 App. Div. 820 ; Weidekind v. Tuolumne Co.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. City of New York

    24 N.Y.3d 1211 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Orelli v. Ambro

    39 N.Y.2d 831 · New York Court of Appeals · May 13, 1976

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Flores v. Lower East Side Services Center, Inc.

    4 N.Y.3d 363 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2005

    In Brown Bros. Elec. Contrs. v Beam Constr. Corp. ( 41 NY2d 397 [1977]), a landowner entered into a written agreement with a general contractor for the construction of a shopping plaza. … The general contractor in turn contracted with Brown, a subcontractor, for electrical work. When the general contractor failed to pay Brown, the owner requested that Brown complete the work, which Brown did.

    Cited 166 timesPublished
  • In re the Arbitration between Waldron & Goddess

    61 N.Y.2d 181 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1984

    (Schubtex, Inc. v Allen Snyder, Inc., 49 NY2d 1, 6 ; see, also, Matter of Marlene Inds. Corp. [Carnac Textiles], 45 NY2d 327, 333-334 .) … Castagna & Son v Michel Plumbing, 61 NY2d 841 ; Matter of American Rail & *186 Steel Co. [India Supply Mission], 308 NY 577 ) nor could she derive any reciprocal right therefrom to compel Waldron to arbitrate.

    Limited by George v. LeBeau, 455 F.3d 92 (2006)Cited 151 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Feeny v. . Bd. of Canvassers

    156 N.Y. 36 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 1898

    Boards of inspectors of election districts, and boards of canvassers, shall continue in office for the purpose of such proceedings." … (Brown on Jurisdiction, § 14.)

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Borneman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

    289 N.Y. 295 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1942

    The case of Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation ( 224 N. Y. 18, 21 ), presented the reverse of the case at bar. … The record shows an utter failure of proof by appellant that Brown was so intoxicated as to be incapable of forming an intention. (Rider v. Preferred Accident Ins. Co., 183 App. Div. 42 ; affd., 230 N. Y. 530 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Price v. . Holman

    101 N.Y. 683 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1886

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Garzo v. Maid of the Mist Steamboat Co.

    303 N.Y. 516 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1952

    After the fact of expiration was brought to its attention in 1947, the board of directors — over plaintiffs’ objection but with the approval of holders of approximately three fourths of the shares of the stock of the corporation … (See, e.g., Coxe v. State of New York, 144 N. Y. 396, 409 ; Wilson v. Brown, 107 Misc. 167 , affd. 190 App. Div. 926 ; see, also, Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Mach. Co., 138 Ill. 67, 73-74 ; Campbell v. Perth Amboy Mut.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Van Dolsen v. . Bd. of Education

    162 N.Y. 446 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1900

    In Miller v. … (Moore v. Mayor, 73 N. Y. 238; Reilly v. City of Albany, 112 N. Y. 30 .) .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Claim of Pearson v. Bestcare

    11 N.Y.3d 802 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Greensmith v. Franklin National Bank

    16 N.Y.2d 973 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1965

    Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Bergan.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of 9th & 10th Street LLC v. Board of Standards and Appeals of City of Ny

    9 N.Y.3d 1019 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Van Deusen v. Jackson

    28 N.Y.2d 608 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1971

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People v. Hollman

    79 N.Y.2d 181 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1992

    The officer opened the bag and inside a sneaker found a brown paper bag that contained a plastic bag of cocaine powder and another plastic bag containing 38 vials of cocaine. … A zippered blue bag carried by an individual about to board a bus is not.

    Cited 687 timesPublished
  • Fein v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

    305 N.Y. 611 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1953

    (See Clark v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 304 N. Y. 488, 490 ; Phillipson v. Ninno, 233 N. Y. 223, 226 .) The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Loughran, Oh.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In THE MATTER OF STEEL LOS III/GOYA FOODS, INC. v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau

    9 N.Y.3d 957 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007

    9 N.Y.3d 957 (2007) In the Matter of STEEL LOS III/GOYA FOODS, INC., Respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF COUNTY OF NASSAU et al., Appellants, and BETHPAGE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Intervenor-Respondent. … BETHPAGE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Respondents, v. NASSAU COUNTY et al., Appellants, and GOYA FOODS, INC., Respondent. (Matter No. 2.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Submitted October 1, 2007.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.

    17 N.Y.3d 908 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2011

    OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]). Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.