Case law

Merrill v. . Grinnell

30 N.Y. 594 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1864

In The Orange County Bank v. Brown ( 9 Wend. 85 ), NELSON, J., in the same incidental way, had intimated that a reasonable sum for traveling expenses could, in such cases, be recovered for. In Weed v. … Michigan Central Railroad Co., 22 Ill. 278 ; Doyle v. Keyser, 6 Ind. 242 ; Duffy v. Thompson, 4 E.D. Smith, 178 .)

People v. Baker

26 N.Y.2d 169 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1970

Of course, in the instant case Brown did not take the stand and, therefore, the Anthony exception is not in point. In People v. McNeil (24 N Y 2d 550; see, also, People v. … Y. 593 ; People v. Fiorentino, 197 N. Y. 560 ; People v. Leyra, 1 N Y 2d 199.) ” (People v. Yazum, 13 N Y 2d 302, 304.) Accordingly, Brown not having taken the stand (People v.

New York State Dormitory Authority v. Board of Trustees of Hyde Park Fire & Water District

87 N.Y.2d 1016 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1996

Newell v. . Doty

33 N.Y. 83 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1865

(Jones v. Osgood, 2 Seld., 233; Caldwell v. Murphy, 1 Kern., 416; Dunkel v. Wiles, id., 420; Lansing v. Wiswall, 5 Denio, 213 .) … 'When the plaintiff advanced the money to “Brown Brothers ” for the note in suit, he lacked a trifling amount, to wit, $13.75, for which amount' he gave Brown Brothers a note.

Goshen National Bank v. Bingham

118 N.Y. 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1890

While the referee finds that it was intended both by Brown and the plaintiffs that the check should be indorsed, and it was supposed that he had so indorsed it, he also finds that Brown made no statement to the effect that … (Harrop v. Fisher; Whistler v. Forster; Savage v. King; Haskell v. Mitchell; Clark v. Whitaker; Clark v. Callison; Lancaster Nat. Bank v. Taylor; Gilbert v. Sharp, cited, supra.) Watkins v.

Hurlbert v. Dean

2 Keyes 97 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1865

These views were repudiated by this, court in Wilson v. … The case of Wilson v.

Herzog Teleseme Company v. . Majestic Hotel Company

186 N.Y. 563 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1906

Werking v. Amity Estates, Inc.

1 N.Y.2d 707 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1956

Johnson v. City of New York

274 N.Y. 411 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1937

Goring v. … Johnson v. Upjohn ( 211 Mich. 514 ) and People v. Elkus ( 59 Cal.App. 396 ) have held this system of voting unconstitutional under their State Constitution. (See, also, Brown v. Smallwood, 130 Minn. 492 .)

Claim of Merchant v. Pinkerton's Inc.

50 N.Y.2d 492 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1980

A divided Appellate Division reversed the board on the law. There should be an affirmance. … City of New York Dept. of Social Servs., 44 NY2d 322, 325-326 ; see Matter of Kilgore v Fragola, 14 AD2d 612 ; Matter of Macechko v Bowen Mfg.

Claim of Holcomb v. Daily News

45 N.Y.2d 602 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1978

Co. v State of New York, 31 AD2d 780 , affd 25 NY2d 647 ; Matter of Collier v Nassau, 46 AD2d 970 ; cf. Matter of Littler v Fuller Co., 223 NY 369 ; but see Green v Travelers Ins. Co., 286 NY 358 ). … Our scope of review is limited to whether there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the determination (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 230-231).

Claim of Davis v. Newsweek Magazine

305 N.Y. 20 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1953

from the beach, he chose to engage in a hazardous act — to dive from a pier in unfamiliar water, as aforesaid— as a result of which he suffered injuries from which he died, *24 The Appellate Division, in sustaining the board … Y. 792 ; Matter of Brown v. United Services for Air, 298 N. Y. 901 ; Matter of Bollard v. Engel, 278 N. Y. 463 ).

Bartlett v. Tarbox

1 Keyes 495 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1864

(Porter v. Potter 18 N. Y., 52 ), and that it is only in cases where such assignor is to be examined against an assignee, or an executor or administrator, that notice of his intended examination is required to be given. … (Varlear v. Livingston, 3 Kern. 248 ; Bidwell v. The Astor Mutual Insurance Company, 16 N. Y., 263 .)

Karl v. New Venture Gear

9 N.Y.3d 1000 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2007

People v. Hemmings

2 N.Y.3d 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2004

He acknowledged that earlier on the evening of the shooting he had a dispute with Brown over some property he believed Brown had stolen from him. … Defendant’s argument that his conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence is not preserved for review (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]).

Park Avenue Clinical Hospital v. Kramer

19 N.Y.2d 958 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1967

People ex rel. Wood v. Draper

1 N.Y. 532 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1857

(Holmes v. Lansing, 3 John., 75 ; Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat., 1 ; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. U. S. R., 311; Morse v. Gould, 1 Kern., 281.) … All the judges, except Brown and Comstock, concurring, Judgment affirmed. Judge Brown was a member of the convention.—Beporteu.

Simmons v. . Cloonan

81 N.Y. 557 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1880

(Huttemeier v. Albro, 18 N. Y. 48 ; French v. Carhart, 1 id. 96 .) … In another case ( Voorhees v. Burchard, 55 N.

Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

87 N.Y.2d 1008 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

Matter of Adult Home at Erie Station, Inc. v. Assessor and Board of Assessment Review of City of Middletown

8 N.Y.3d 992 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2007