Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

0.93s

  • Merrill v. . Grinnell

    30 N.Y. 594 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1864

    In The Orange County Bank v. Brown ( 9 Wend. 85 ), NELSON, J., in the same incidental way, had intimated that a reasonable sum for traveling expenses could, in such cases, be recovered for. In Weed v. … Michigan Central Railroad Co., 22 Ill. 278 ; Doyle v. Keyser, 6 Ind. 242 ; Duffy v. Thompson, 4 E.D. Smith, 178 .)

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan

    1 N.Y.2d 877 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1956

    Balcom v. … And, in Matter of Berger v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pickering v. Car Win Construction, Inc.

    26 N.Y.3d 1139 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LaCroix v. Syracuse Executive Air Service, Inc.

    8 N.Y.3d 348 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007

    Quoting Matter of Miller v North Syracuse Cent. … In Matter of Lynch v Board of Educ. of City of N Y. ( 1 AD2d 362 [1956], affd 3 NY2d 871 [1957]), the court considered whether section 25 permitted an employer to be reimbursed by its carrier for the full amount of weekly

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Castle Hill Beach Club, Inc. v. Arbury

    2 N.Y.2d 596 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1957

    However, this court pointed out in Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club ( 296 N. … Copies of the by-laws were never distributed to the seasonal members and no copies were ever posted on the bulletin board at the park.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ely v. . Supervisors of Niagara County

    36 N.Y. 297 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1867

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Newell v. . Doty

    33 N.Y. 83 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1865

    (Jones v. Osgood, 2 Seld., 233; Caldwell v. Murphy, 1 Kern., 416; Dunkel v. Wiles, id., 420; Lansing v. Wiswall, 5 Denio, 213 .) … 'When the plaintiff advanced the money to “Brown Brothers ” for the note in suit, he lacked a trifling amount, to wit, $13.75, for which amount' he gave Brown Brothers a note.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • S & R Lake Lounge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

    87 N.Y.2d 206 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1995

    Co. v Labor Bd., 305 US 197, 229 ). … Auth., 144 AD2d 562 ; Matter of Park II Villa Corp. v New York State Liq.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Williams v. . Haines

    49 N.Y. 587 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1872

    (Williams v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 16 N. Y., 97 ; People v. Wearing, 27 id., 306; Parks v. Boston, 15 Pick., 198 ; Brown v. Powell, 25 Penn. St. R., 229; Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v. Hartford R. R. Co., 17 Conn., 454 .) … (Strachey v. Turley, 11 East., 194, per Lord Ellenborough, C. J.)

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • McGregor v. . B'd of Ed'n of City of N.Y.

    107 N.Y. 511 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1887

    (Livingston v. Potts, 16 Johns. 28 ; Springstein v. Schermerhorn, 12 id. 357.) … (Sperry v. Miller, 16 N. Y. 407 .)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Wood v. Draper

    1 N.Y. 532 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1857

    (Holmes v. Lansing, 3 John., 75 ; Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat., 1 ; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. U. S. R., 311; Morse v. Gould, 1 Kern., 281.) … All the judges, except Brown and Comstock, concurring, Judgment affirmed. Judge Brown was a member of the convention.—Beporteu.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ling Chen v. Reuters America Holdings, Inc.

    25 N.Y.3d 1032 · New York Court of Appeals · May 12, 2015

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steinson v. . Bd. of Education of N.Y.

    165 N.Y. 431 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1901

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.

    1 N.Y.3d 258 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2003

    Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, 894 [2001]). … In Matter of Losurdo v Asbestos Free: Order reversed, etc.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Tantillo v. Goldstein Brothers Amusement Co.

    248 N.Y. 286 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1928

    From the evidence, no inference can be drawn that he was employed by the theatre rather than by Brown. It was the theatre, however, and not Brown who admitted him. … (Arnold v. State, 163 App. Div. 253 ; Platt v. Erie County Agricultural Society, 164 App. Div. 99 .)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Claim of Davis v. Newsweek Magazine

    305 N.Y. 20 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1953

    from the beach, he chose to engage in a hazardous act — to dive from a pier in unfamiliar water, as aforesaid— as a result of which he suffered injuries from which he died, *24 The Appellate Division, in sustaining the board … Y. 792 ; Matter of Brown v. United Services for Air, 298 N. Y. 901 ; Matter of Bollard v. Engel, 278 N. Y. 463 ).

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • People v. Hemmings

    2 N.Y.3d 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2004

    He acknowledged that earlier on the evening of the shooting he had a dispute with Brown over some property he believed Brown had stolen from him. … Defendant’s argument that his conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence is not preserved for review (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]).

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

    87 N.Y.2d 1008 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Bd. of Education of City of New York

    258 N.Y. 117 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1932

    Board of Education, 245 N. Y. 8 ; Herman v. Board of Education, 234 N. Y. 196 ; Lessin v. Board of Education, 247 N. Y. 503, p. 510 .) … (Barringer v. Powell, 230 N. Y. 37, p. 43 ; Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 N. Y. 373 ; Matter of Pardee v. Rayfield, 230 N. Y. 543 .) In People ex rel. Lewis v. Graves ( 245 N.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hollis v. Marriott Hotel

    87 N.Y.2d 859 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.