Case law

Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. Barwick

67 N.Y.2d 510 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1986

New York City’s Board of Estimate may then modify or disapprove the designation, and the owner may seek judicial review of the final decision. … Synagogue v Incorporated *524 Vil. of Roslyn Harbor, 38 NY2d 283, 287-289 ; Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v Brown, 22 NY2d 488, 493, 496 , supra; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v Planning Bd., 1 NY2d 508 ).

Medicon Diagnostic Laboratories, Inc. v. Perales

74 N.Y.2d 539 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1989

Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 577 , supra). … e.g., Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 577-578 , supra; Goldberg v Kelly, 397 US 254, 261-262 ).

Com'rs of Pilots v. . Pac. Mail Steamship Co.

52 N.Y. 609 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 1873

Matter of N.Y. World-Telegram Corp. v. McGoldrick

298 N.Y. 11 · New York Court of Appeals · May 21, 1948

Browning, 210 N. Y. 10 ). … Browning, supra; Gardner v. Town of Cameron, 155 App. Div. 750 , affd. 215 N. Y. 682 ; Ohl & Co. v. Standard Steel Sections, Inc., 179 App. Div. 637 ; Equitable General Providing Co. v. Eisentrager, 34 Misc. 179 ).

Newman v. . Supervisors of Livingston Co.

45 N.Y. 676 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1871

This is the act of the board, though to be performed by the members severally. A board of supervisors is a continuous body, though of changing members. (Supervisors of Chenango v. Birdsall, 4 Wend., 460 .) … (Wayland v. Tysen and Thompson v.

Buguero v. U.S. Sh.

246 N.Y. 643 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1927

Lockhart v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 13 of Perinton & Pittsford

243 N.Y. 642 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1926

James Lockhart, Appellant, v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 13 of the Towns of Perinton and Pittsford, Monroe County, et al., Respondents. … Lillian Lockhart, an Infant, by James Lockhart, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v.

James Square Associates LP v. Mullen

21 N.Y.3d 233 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 2013

WL appealed to *245 the Board, and the Board determined that WL failed to provide sufficient evidence that the Commissioner’s finding was in error. … The responsible agency, DED, gave the ambiguous statute a rational interpretation that was not inconsistent with the plain language (see Matter of Brown v Wing, 93 NY2d 517, 524 [1999] [determining that it is “proper to utilize

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Board of Assessors of the Nassau

75 N.Y.2d 803 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1990

The Bd. of Commr's of Excise of Tompkins Cty. v. . Taylor

21 N.Y. 173 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1860

The case of Nevin v. … In The Board of Commissioners, &c., of Cayuga County, v. Freeoff (17 How. Pr.

Middleton v. Coxsackie Correctional Facility

38 N.Y.2d 130 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1975

; Matter of Jones v Curran & Co., 33 AD2d 525 ; Matter of Ellis v Armour & Co., 31 AD2d 690 ; Matter of Greensmith v Franklin Nat. … The order should be reversed and the decision reinstated, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

People Ex Rel. New York Mail & Newspaper Transportation Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

210 N.Y. 623 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1914

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

223 N.Y. 671 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1918

Michael Cutaia v. The Board of Managers of the 160/170 Varick Street , Condominium

New York Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 2022

No. 25 Michael Cutaia, Respondent, v. … We agree with the dissent below that plaintiff was not entitled to partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim (see Cutaia v Board of Mgrs. of the Varick St.

People Ex Rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

222 N.Y. 542 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1917

Mack v. County of Rockland

71 N.Y.2d 1008 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1988

An "occupational disease” derives from the very nature of the employment, not a specific condition peculiar to the employee’s place of work (see, Matter of Paider v Park E. … Movers, 19 NY2d 373, 377 ; Matter of Goldberg v 954 Marcy Corp., 276 NY 313, 318-319 ).

Carson v. Federal Reserve Bank

254 N.Y. 218 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1930

The Board renewed its order that the relation should be one of agency (Regulation J, subd. 7, Federal Reserve Board, Report of 1916, p. 171). … S. 330 ; Lichtenstein v. Grossman Constr. Corp., 248 N. Y. 390 ; Matter of Hallett’s Estate, 13 Ch. Div. 696; Cunningham v. Brown, 265 U. S. 1, 12, 13 ).

Milliken v. . Dehon

27 N.Y. 364 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1863

They have no application to the present case, unless it be as an illustration of the construction put upon a power to sell at the board of brokers. Wilson v. … Thus, Judge BROWN, in Wheeler v.

Bell v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

20 N.Y.2d 54 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1967

S. 511 ; Slochower v. Board of Educ., 350 U. … Code, tit. 29, § 504; see United States v. Brown, 381 U. S. 437 ).

People v. Luciano

277 N.Y. 348 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1938

The witness Flo Brown saw Luciano, Pennochio, Betillo and Frederico in conference on numerous occasions. … (People v. McKane, 143 N. Y. 455, 470 . See, also, People v. Cassidy, 213 N. Y. 388 ; People v. Becker, 215 N. Y. 126 ; People v. Miles, 192 N. Y. 541 .)