Case law

The Matter of Randy Peyton v. New York City Board of Standards , and Appeals

New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2020

No. 88 In the Matter of Randy Peyton, &c., Respondent, Hillel Hoffman, et al., Intervenors-Respondents, v. New York City Board of Standards and Appeals, et al., Appellants. … Board of Stds

Danolds v. . the State of New York

89 N.Y. 36 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1882

(Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 519 ; Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 87,137 ; State of New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 id. 164 .) In Fletcher v. … In United States v.

Werking v. Amity Estates, Inc.

2 N.Y.2d 43 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1956

However, as stated in Bunner v. … (See, also, Lockwood v. Gehlert, 127 N. Y. 241, 248 ; Neber v. Hatch, 10 Abb. N. C. 431 , affd. on opinion below 88 N. Y. 657 ; Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts, 208 N. Y. 288, 311 ; Helterline v. People, 295 N.

Ennis v. . Chichester

227 N.Y. 663 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1920

Matter of New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

7 N.Y.3d 908 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2006

Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

6 N.Y.3d 563 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 2006

Relations Bd., 95 NY2d 73, 79 [2000]; see also, e.g., Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. Empl. … ’ personnel files (Board of Educ., Great Neck Union Free School Dist. v Areman, 41 NY2d 527 [1977]).

In the Matter of Pyramid Company of Watertown v. Planning Board of Town of Watertown

7 N.Y.3d 803 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2006

Yonkers Federation of Teachers v. Board of Education of Yonkers City School District

44 N.Y. 752 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1978

On a prior appeal in this case, our court granted the teachers’ cross motion to compel arbitration of a job security clause claimed to have been breached by the board when a financial emergency resulted in substantial layoffs … of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers, 40 NY2d 268, 276 ).

West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp.

6 N.Y.2d 344 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1959

6 N.Y.2d 344 (1959) West View Hills, Inc., Respondent, v. Lizau Realty Corp. et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued March 9, 1959. Decided July 8, 1959. Richard A. Brown for appellants. … And in Fanchon & Marco v.

Sgaglione v. Levitt

37 N.Y.2d 507 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1975

Co. v Ahern, 344 US 367 ). … In Brown , it was held that the term "benefits” in this constitutional provision did not include representation on the Retirement Board of the New York State Teachers Retirement System and that the decrease in teachers’ voting

Crosby v. WORKERS'COMP.

57 N.Y.2d 305 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1982

He advised the board, in an accompanying letter, that plaintiff had agreed to deposit the sum of $300 with him, to be held in trust and applied to any fee subsequently approved by the board. … 471, 485 ; People v Whidden, 51 NY2d 457, 460 ; Alevy v Downstate Med.

People of the State of N.Y. v. . Ingersoll

58 N.Y. 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1874

(Attorney-General v. Brown, 1 Swans., 265; Samev. Heelis, 2 S. & S., 67; Same v. Eastlake, 11 Hare, 205 ; Same v. Mayor of Dublin, 1 Bligh [N. P. R.], 312; Same v. Mayor of Liverpool, 1 M. & C., 171; Same v. … Attorney-General v. Huber, Same v. Eastlake, Same v.

White v. . Devendorf

197 N.Y. 598 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1910

Scarff v. . Metcalf

107 N.Y. 211 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1887

(Couch v. Steel, 77 Eng. Com. Law. Rep. 402; Brown v. Overton, 1 Sprague, 463 ; Mosely v. Scott, 14 Am. Law Reg. 599 ; Tomlinson v. Hewett, 2 Sawyer, 278; Petersen v. … In Kenzel v.

Queensborough Community College of the City University v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

41 N.Y. 926 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1977

In Federal practice under the Federal statutes a similar conclusion was reached by the Supreme Court (Electrical Workers v Robbins & Meyers, 429 US 229, 236-240 ). *927 Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones

Matter of Viemeister

179 N.Y. 235 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1904

Y. 98, 108 ; People v. Merx, 99 N. Y. 377 ; People v. Arensberg, 105 N. Y. 123 ; People v. *239 Gillson, 109 N. Y. 389 ; People v. Ewer, 141 N. Y. 129; People ex rel. Nechamcus v. Warden, etc., 144 N. Y. 529 ; People v. … Justice Swayíte in Brown v„ Piper (91 TJ.

Kittinger v. . Buffalo Traction Co.

160 N.Y. 377 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1899

Wakeley v. … The question we have been considering was before the court in Adamson v. Nassau Electric Railroad Company ( 89 Hun, 261 ), and the same conclusion reached, Judge Brown writing.

Thompson v. Menck

2 Keyes 82 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1865

(State of Michigan v. The Phoenix Bank, 33 N. … J., Davies, Brown and Campbell, JJ., concurring, Porter, J., not voting, Judgment reversed.

MATTER OF BELL v. Waterfront Comm.

20 N.Y.2d 54 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1967

S. 511 ; Slochower v. Board of Educ. , 350 U. … Code, tit. 29, § 504; see United States v. Brown , 381 U. S. 437 ).

Shinbaum v. Murphy

287 N.Y. 529 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1942

We think the courts below erred in declaring as an inference of law that the codefendant Murphy was the servant of the defendant-appellant Cross & Brown Company rather than an independent contractor. … (See Fritz v. Krasne, 273 N. Y. 649 ; Irwin v. Klein, 271 N. Y. 477 ; Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co., 254 N. Y. 60 .) The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.