Case law

Shelofsky v. Helsby

32 N.Y.2d 54 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1973

As said in Matter of Di Maggio v. … ” (see, also, City of New York v.

S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New York

32 N.Y.2d 300 · New York Court of Appeals · May 4, 1973

Vavolizza v. Krieger, 39 A D 2d 446.) In Schwartz v. … Div. 496 ); the right to counsel at any critical stage of the criminal process (e.g., Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U. S. 52 ); the right to suppression of involuntary statements (e.g., Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.

Frank v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 of Cortlandt

243 N.Y. 603 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1926

Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of Standards

5 N.Y.3d 781 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2005

Matter of Hodosy v. Board of Trustees of Roswell P. Flower Mem. Lib.

2 N.Y.3d 708 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2004

2 N.Y.3d 708 (2004) MATTER OF HODOSY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ROSWELL R FLOWER MEM. LIB. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided June 10, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Matter of Pestlin v. Haxton Canning Co.

299 N.Y. 477 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1949

Beckett ( 69 Col. 90 ); Quarles v. Kendrick Mercantile Co. ( 202 Ala. 56 ); Brown v. Higginbotham (5 Leigh [32 Va.] 633). … (Matter of Butterfield v. Brown, 287 N.

Werner v. State of New York

53 N.Y.2d 346 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1981

Swingly, 42 AD2d 1035 , supra; Estupinan v Cleanerama Drive-In Cleaners, 38 AD2d 353 , supra; Santiago v Brill Monfort Co., 11 AD2d 1041 , affd 10 NY2d 718 ; Artonio v Hirsch, 3 AD2d 939 ; Walstein v Blank, 35 Misc 2d 1015 … While there are a number of cases supporting that conclusion, 4 the clearest exposition is that contained in Legault v Brown ( 283 App Div 303 ).

Redmond v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.

46 N.Y. 578 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1871

(Story on Bailments, § 545 ; Ostrander v. Brown, 15 J. R., 39; Mayell v. Potter, 2 J. Cas., 371; Fisk v. Newton, 1 Den., 45 .) Judge Grier, in Richardson v. Goddard (23 How. U. S. … Gotliff v. Brown (4 Bing. N. C., 314; S. C., in Exch.

The Matter of Eric Benson v. New York State Board of Parole

New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 2020

No. 63 SSM 4 In the Matter of Eric Benson, Appellant, v. New York State Board of Parole, Respondent. Submitted by Alfred O'Connor, for appellant. … Garry at the Appellate Division (see Matter of Benson v New York State Board of Parole, 176 AD3d 1548, 1553-1555 [3rd Dept 2019] [Garry, P.J. dissenting]).

Duncan v. Clarke

308 N.Y. 282 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1955

Y. 17, 24 ), this court reaffirmed the doctrine of Rosseau v. Rouss (supra) as a general rule indicating there may be exceptions. Matter of Browning ( 280 N. … In the Browning case (supra) the appellant sought a share in the intestate estate or damages in the sum of $1,000,000.

Capital District Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

54 N.Y.2d 154 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1981

Following a hearing before the board, at which CDROTB contested the board’s authority to act in this matter, the directive was confirmed. … , it is an improper delegation of the State board’s authority.

Easley v. New York State Thruway Authority

1 N.Y.2d 374 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1956

Glassman v. Glassman, 309 N. … Since the State as sovereign may assert, waive, or condition at will immunity from suit for itself and its agents (see Matter of Brown v. Board of Trustees of Hamptonburg School Dist., 303 N.

People v. Leonard

62 N.Y.2d 404 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1984

.; see People v Brown, 25 NY2d 374, 377 ). At the outset, we reject defendant’s claim that SUNY-Binghamton is not generally empowered to exclude persons from the university campus. … Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v Horowitz, 435 US 78, 82-84 ; Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564, 568-572 ).

In the Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach

8 N.Y.3d 914 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007

People Ex. Rel. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

209 N.Y. 496 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1913

(People ex rel. *501 Joline v. Tax Commrs., N. Y. Law Journal, Nov. 27, 1912; People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. Tax Commrs., N. Y. Law Journal, Nov. 27, 1912.) … Water Co. v. Tax Commrs., 142 N. Y. Supplement, 180 ; People ex rel. Kings Co. L. Co. v. Willcox, 156 App. Div. 603, 610 .)

Rudd v. . Robinson

126 N.Y. 113 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1891

In Hill v. … In Haynes v. Brown (36 N.

Morrill Realty Corp. v. Rayon Holding Corp.

254 N.Y. 268 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1930

In Bennett v. Bates ( 94 N. … Brown, referee, who decided the case in the first instance, is printed in the Appellate Division reports.

People v. Johnson

30 N.Y.2d 929 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1972

Pro., § 180-a; Sibron v. New York, 392 U. S. 40 ; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1 .) … People v. Arthurs, 24 N Y 2d 688; People v. Taggart, 20 N Y 2d 335.) Accordingly, the conviction of appellant should be reversed and the information dismissed.

City of New York v. . Rice

198 N.Y. 124 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1910

(See People v. Kerr, supra, and Story v. N. Y. Elev. R. R. Co., 90 N. Y. 122 .) … The case of Wormser v. Brown, ( 149 N. Y. 163 ), was held to be inapplicable as an authority for the defendant’s case.

Bauer v. Female Academy of the Sacred Heart

97 N.Y.2d 445 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2002

Moreover, although Labor Law § 240 (1) covers “cleaning,” it does not apply to routine household cleaning (Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp., 87 NY2d 938 [1996]). … Likewise, in Teller v Prospect Hgts.