Case law

Ebner v. Board of Education of East Williston Union Free School District No. 2

42 N.Y.2d 938 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1977

Werner v. State of New York

53 N.Y.2d 346 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1981

Swingly, 42 AD2d 1035 , supra; Estupinan v Cleanerama Drive-In Cleaners, 38 AD2d 353 , supra; Santiago v Brill Monfort Co., 11 AD2d 1041 , affd 10 NY2d 718 ; Artonio v Hirsch, 3 AD2d 939 ; Walstein v Blank, 35 Misc 2d 1015 … While there are a number of cases supporting that conclusion, 4 the clearest exposition is that contained in Legault v Brown ( 283 App Div 303 ).

Ryder v. Bushwick Railroad

134 N.Y. 83 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1892

The trial court has found as facts that such certificates were not issued by the authority of the board of directors; that they had not ratified such issue and had not authorized the *85 executive committee or the president … (Barnes v. Brown, 80 N. Y. 527 -534; Burrall v. Bushwick R. R. Co., 75 id. 211; N. Y. & N. H. R. R. Co. v. Schwy ler, 34 id. 30.) The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur. Judgment affirmed.

Professional Staff Congress-City University v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

7 N.Y.3d 780 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2006

Matter of Di Bari v. Bd. of Standards & Appeals of the City of New York

1 N.Y.2d 756 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1956

1 N.Y.2d 756 (1956) In the Matter of Joseph Di Bari, Appellant, v. Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued March 22, 1956. … Peter Campbell Brown , Corporation Counsel ( Andrew Bellanca and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondents. Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL and VAN VOORHIS, JJ. Taking no part: BURKE, J.

People Ex Rel. Long Island Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

231 N.Y. 571 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1921

Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs., 231 N. Y. 221 .) … All concur, except Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ., who vote to reverse order of Appellate Division so far as appealed from by State Board of Tax Commissioners and City of New York and otherwise to affirm the same.

People Ex Rel. Union Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

212 N.Y. 583 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1914

Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comrs. ( 212 N. Y. 472 ). Concur: Werner, Hiscogk, Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J.

MATTER OF JUAN C. v. Cortines

89 N.Y.2d 659 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1997

L The testimony before the Board of Education Hearing Officer showed these salient facts about this case. … Additionally, in Brown v City of New York ( 60 NY2d 897 , supra), this Court concluded that issue preclusion did not apply against the defendant City of New York in a civil action for *672 false arrest, false imprisonment

Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of Standards

5 N.Y.3d 781 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 2005

Matter of Hodosy v. Board of Trustees of Roswell P. Flower Mem. Lib.

2 N.Y.3d 708 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2004

2 N.Y.3d 708 (2004) MATTER OF HODOSY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF ROSWELL R FLOWER MEM. LIB. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided June 10, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Shelofsky v. Helsby

32 N.Y.2d 54 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1973

As said in Matter of Di Maggio v. … ” (see, also, City of New York v.

Shaw v. Tague

257 N.Y. 193 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1931

(Benson v. Dean, 232 N. Y. 52, 56 .) … (Hickenbottom v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 122 N. Y. 91 .)

People v. Street

20 N.Y.2d 231 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1967

Board of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 [flag salute].) … Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U. S. 131, 139 , supra; Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U. S. 157, 173-174 .)

Matter of Levitch v. Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y.

244 N.Y. 505 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1926

People Ex Rel. Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. Davis

277 N.Y. 292 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1938

Browne v. City of New York, 241 N. Y. 96, 114 .) We hold that the mandate of the Constitution requires no more than was done in this case, as disclosed by these journals. … (Gaynor v. Marohn, 268 N. Y. 417 , and cases there cited.) We find that the corporate body here created is such an agency of the State. Indeed, in the opinion by Crane, Ch.

Matter of Hiler v. Board of Educ. of Byron-Bergen Cent. School Dist.

6 N.Y.3d 707 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2006

6 N.Y.3d 707 (2006) MATTER OF HILER v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF BYRON-BERGEN CENT. SCHOOL DIST. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided February 21, 2006. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Berlyn v. Board of Education of the East Meadow Union Free School District

55 N.Y.2d 912 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1982

In the Matter of Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach

8 N.Y.3d 914 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007

Frank v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 of Cortlandt

243 N.Y. 603 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1926

Ackerman v. . True

175 N.Y. 353 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1903

(Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519, 541 .) In N. Y. Rubber Co. v. Rothery ( 107 N. … It is, doubtless, true that Wormser v. Brown ( 149 N. Y. 163 ) has carried that doctrine to its extreme limit.