Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.42s
Baldwin Research Inst., Inc. v. Board of Assessment Review of Town of Amsterdam
14 N.Y.3d 702 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 2010
14 N.Y.3d 702 (2010) BALDWIN RESEARCH INST., INC. v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF TOWN OF AMSTERDAM. Motion No: 2009-1335. Court of Appeals of New York. Decided February 18, 2010. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished147 N.Y. 284 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1895
Brown ( 18 Mich. 196 ) the bill Ivas filed to restrain the defendants, a canal board, from committing a 'threatened trespass upon the complainant’s property, by removing certain cribs as a foundation for docks in a river … In People v. Canal Board ( 55 N.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSleepy Hollow Valley Committee v. McMorran
20 N.Y.2d 190 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1967
Such a reason was given in Matter of Brown v. McMorran (23 A D 2d 661) by pointing out that section 85 of the Highway Luav directs him to do all acts necessary to comply with the Federal Aid Highway Acts (U. S. … Wauful v. Reel, 157 App. Div. 128, 132 ).”
Cited 4 timesPublishedJewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of the North Shore, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn Harbor
38 N.Y.2d 283 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1975
Indeed the ground rules for such a balance were set forth in Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v Brown (22 NY2d 488). … (See People v Taub, 37 NY2d 530 ; Cantwell v *289 Connecticut, 310 US 296 ; Sherbert v Verner, 374 US 398 ; Wisconsin v Yoder, 406 US 205 .)
Cited 37 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 v. Town of Greenburgh
277 N.Y. 193 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1938
Here no real property may be “ exempt from taxation by law ” unless so exempted by statutory law (City of Rochester v. Coe, 25 App. Div. 300 ). … Y. 528 ; Buffalo City Cemetery v. City of Buffalo, 46 N. Y. 506 ; Matter of St. Joseph's Asylum, 69 N. Y. 353 ; Roosevelt Hospital v. Mayor, 84 N. Y. 108 ; Matter of Hun, 144 N. Y. 472 ; People ex rel.
Cited 21 timesPublishedOntario Knitting Co. v. . State
205 N.Y. 409 · New York Court of Appeals · May 14, 1912
(Washington Cemetery v. Prospect Park & Coney Island R. R. Co., 68 N. Y. 591 ; Matter of New York & Harlem R. R. Co. v. Kip, 46 N. Y. 546 ; Matter of South Beach R. R. Co., 119 N. Y. 141 ; Birdsell v. Clark, 73 N. … Y. 388, 393 ; State v. City of Paterson, 34 N. J. L. 163; Schwartze v. City of Camden, 77 N. J. Eq. 135; Brown v. City of Newburyport, 209 Mass. 259, 264 ; Gaines v. Thompson, 74 U.
Cited 16 timesPublishedTotem Taxi, Inc. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
65 N.Y. 300 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1985
The employer appealed the Division’s order to the Human Rights Appeal Board. … Because the Board was unable to obtain a majority vote it determined that the Division’s order remained in effect.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatter of Com'rs of Wash'ton Park, Albany
52 N.Y. 131 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1873
Parol evidence may be resorted to to prove the identity of the paper. ( Climar v. Cooke, 1 Sch. Lef., 22; Riley v. City of Brooklyn, 46 N.Y., 444 .) … The formal petition, signed and verified by the president of the board of commissioners. Second.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Bay Shore Union Free School District v. Thomas K.
14 N.Y.3d 289 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2010
The School District brought an action in federal court, under the IDEA, for review of the administrative determination (see Bay Shore Union Free School Dist. v T. ex rel. R., 405 F Supp 2d 230 [ED NY 2005]). … In Board of Educ. of Monroe-Woodbury Cent.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn the Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board of Town of Southeast
9 N.Y.3d 898 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2007
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatter of Kay v. Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y.
284 N.Y. 578 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1940
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Town of Blenheim v. Board of Supervisors of County of Sohoharie
121 N.Y. 345 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1890
(People v. Bd. of Suprs., etc., 93 N. Y. 397 .) … Russell v. Bd. of Suprs., 46 Hun, 354 .) That case was followed by the General Term in the decision of the case at bar.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRSM West Lake Road LLC v. Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals
12 N.Y.3d 755 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2009
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Jones v. New York State Board of Parole
54 N.Y.2d 644 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedGenesis of Mount Vernon, N. Y., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
80 N.Y.2d 823 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1992
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Union Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
212 N.Y. 583 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1914
Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comrs. ( 212 N. Y. 472 ). Concur: Werner, Hiscogk, Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok and Hogan, JJ. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChemical National Bank v. Colwell
132 N.Y. 250 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1892
(Limited), was not brought to the attention of the board of directors. And his statement made to that effect to Jones, who was the secretary-treasurer of the company, does not seem effectual to accomplish it. … (Adderly v. Storm, 6 Hill, 624 ; Worrall v. Judson, 5 Barb. 210 ; Rosevelt v. Brown, 11 N. Y. 148 .)
Cited 28 timesPublishedMATTER OF BROOKS DRUGS INC. v. Board of Assessors of City of Schenectady
11 N.Y.3d 710 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 2008
11 N.Y.3d 710 (2008) MATTER OF BROOKS DRUGS INC. v BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF CITY OF SCHENECTADY Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided November 20, 2008 Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Feeney v. Board of Canvassers of Richmond County
156 N.Y. 686 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1898
Cited 0 timesPublishedSuffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board
10 N.Y.3d 806 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna