Case law

Moore v. . Westervelt

27 N.Y. 234 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1863

In Jenner v. … In Browning v. Hanford ( 5 Hill, 588 ), COWEN, J., was of the opinion Justice STORY was right in putting the general liability of officers having the charge of property on the same footing as that of bailees for hire.

Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League Club

307 N.Y. 475 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1954

Y. 515 ; Bradford v. County of Suffolk, 283 N. Y. 503 ; Texas Co. v. Brown, 258 U. S. 466 ; Duplex Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443 ). … (Norman v. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co., 294 U. S. 240 ; Stephenson v. Binford, 287 U. S. 251 ; People ex rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La Fetra, 230 N. Y. 429 ; Board of Educ. of Dist. No. 6 v. Board of Educ. of Dist.

Alevy v. Downstate Medical Center

39 N.Y.2d 326 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1976

, 378 US 130 ; Pennsylvania v Board of Trusts, 353 US 230). … Educ., 395 US 225 ; Brown v Board of Educ., 347 US 483 ). 8 It would indeed be *335 ironic and, of course, would cut against the very grain of the amendment, were the equal protection clause used to strike down measures

Town of Riverhead v. New York State Board of Real Property Services

4 N.Y.3d 756 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2005

Fund for Lake George, Inc. v. Town of Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals

25 N.Y.3d 1039 · New York Court of Appeals · May 14, 2015

In the Matter of Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Planning Board of Town of Southeast

10 N.Y.3d 741 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 2008

10 N.Y.3d 741 (2008) In the Matter of RIVERKEEPER, INC., Respondent, v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF SOUTHEAST et al., Appellants. In the Matter of RICHARD FEUERMAN et al., Respondents, v. … PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF SOUTHEAST et al., Appellants. In the Matter of CROTON WATERSHED CLEAN WATER COALITION, INC., et al., Respondents, v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF SOUTHEAST et al., Appellants.

Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Nassau BOCES Central Council of Teachers

64 N.Y.2d 632 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1984

Ace Fire Underwriters Insurance v. Orange-Ulster Board of Cooperative Educational Services

3 N.Y.3d 763 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004

Cincinnati National Bank v. Tilden

55 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1893

795 Fifth Avenue Corp. v. City of New York

15 N.Y.2d 221 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1965

The rule is settled (Stahl Soap Corp. v. City of New York, 5 N Y 2d 200; Kashel v. Impellitteri, 306 *225 N. Y. 73 , cert. den. 347 U. S. 934 ; Kittinger v. Buffalo Traction Co., 160 N. Y. 377 ; Altschul v. … The proof demonstrates adequate power in the Park Commissioner and the Board of Estimate to accept or reject this restaurant proposal.

In THE MATTER OF BRAMBLE v. New York State Board of Parole

1 N.Y.3d 616 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2004

Matter of Savetsky v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Southampton

3 N.Y.3d 604 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2004

3 N.Y.3d 604 (2004) MATTER OF SAVETSKY v. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided August 31, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

People v. . Warder

234 N.Y. 602 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1922

People Ex Rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

193 N.Y. 649 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1908

Board of Hudson River Regulating District v. John A. Willard Realty & Lumber Co.

267 N.Y. 549 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1935

Puentes v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21

19 N.Y.2d 809 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1967

.: Appellant contended that, although section 3012 of the Education Law was not unconstitutional on its face, it was unconstitutional to the extent that it authorized the board to penalize him for insubordination and acts … The Court of Appeals held that the finding of the local school board that the letter was defamatory, malicious and false and that it was designed to create suspicion, dissension and disharmony among the board, the administration

People Ex Rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

197 N.Y. 33 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1909

In the brief of the attorney-general a desire is expressed for further enlightenment as to the character of the return which the statute requires the state board of tax commissioners to make in cases of this kind.

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Town of Red Hook

60 N.Y.2d 99 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1983

(People v De Jesus, 54 NY2d 465, 468 , supra; McMillen v Browne, 14 NY2d 326, 331 .) … Realty Corp. v Goodman, 300 NY 140,148 , supra; Matter of McCabe v Voorhis, 243 NY 401, 416 .)

In Re the Arbitration Between Willard Alexander, Inc. & Glasser

31 N.Y.2d 270 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1972

(See, e.g., Machinists v. Gonzales, 356 U. S. 617, 618 ; Maltese v. Dubinsky, 304 N. Y. 450, 455 ; Nilan v. Colleran, 283 N. Y. 84, 89 ; O’Keefe v. Local 463 of Assn. of Plumbers, 277 N. Y. 300, 304 ; Polin v. … Pressprich & Co., 453 F. 2d 1209 , 1211 — 1212; Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & Neufeld, 451 F. 2d 838, 840-841 , affg. 320 F. Supp. 193, 194 ; cf. Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co., 287 F. Supp. 766, 769-770 . 4 .

New York State Employment Relations Board v. Christ the King Regional High School

90 N.Y.2d 244 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1997

Dept. of Human Resources v Smith ( 494 US 872 ), expressly rejecting its previously utilized balancing test (id., at 883-885 [citing Sherbert v Verner, 374 US 398, 402-403 ]; see also, City of Boerne v Flores, — US —, 117 … Therefore, the Board "may order reinstatement of a lay teacher at a parochial school only if he or she would not have been fired otherwise for asserted religious reasons” (Catholic High School Assn. v Culvert, supra, 753