Case law

Ciaccia v. Board of Educ. of the City of New York

272 N.Y. 510 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1936

Adult Home at Erie Station, Inc. v. Assessor & Board of Assessment Review

9 N.Y.3d 970 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2007

Matter of Fabricius v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.

292 N.Y. 551 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1944

Hilfer v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

284 N.Y. 733 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1940

Adams v. . Conover

87 N.Y. 422 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1882

(Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519; Thompson v. Allen, 7 Lans. 459 ). … (Smith v. Smith, 79 N. Y. 634 .) An exception was taken to the charge of the court that the slash-boards were to be treated as a permanent part of the dam.

The Ministers and Missionaries Benefit Board v. Leon Snow v. The Estate of Clark Flesher

26 N.Y.3d 466 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 2015

Corp. v MasTec N. Am., Inc., 7 NY3d 624, 629 [2006]). … Chamberlain, 43 NY 424, 433 [1871]; Parsons v Lyman, 20 NY 103, 112 [1859]; Holmes v Remsen, 4 Johns Ch 460, 470 [NY 1820]; see also EPTL 3-5.1 [b], derived from former Decedent Estate Law § 47, derived from former Code of

Schuyler v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7

15 N.Y.2d 746 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1965

Claim of Glickman v. Greater New York Taxpayers

305 N.Y. 431 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1953

While workmen’s compensation “ is not confined by common-law conceptions of scope of employment ” (O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U. … (See, e.g., Murphy v. Board of Educ., *434 314 Mich. 226 ; Industrial Comm. v. Gintert, 128 Ohio St. 129 ; see, also, 1 Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law [1952], § 18.31, p. 253; § 18.32, pp. 256-257.)

Poughkeepsie Professional Firefighters' Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

6 N.Y.3d 765 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2006

Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the University

4 N.Y.2d 349 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1958

Helpful as are the Roth decision’s explanations of the constitutional limits of speech and press freedom (and see, also, Alberts v. California, 354 U. S. 476 , and Kingsley Books v. Brown, 354 U. … To be examined is “ the operation and effect of the statute in substance ” (Near v. Minnesota, 283 U. S. 697, 713 ; Kingsley Books v. Brown, 354 U. S. 436, 441 , supra).

Incorporated Village of Atlantic Beach v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Hempstead

94 N.Y.2d 842 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1999

The Zoning Board of Appeals held that the caretaker’s apartment was a permitted accessory use, given the size of the beach *844 club and the propensity for vandalism in an area that was deserted when the club was not in use … That determination was neither irrational, unreasonable nor inconsistent with the governing statute (Matter of New York Botanical Garden v Board of Stds. & Appeals, 91 NY2d 413, 419 ).

New York Central Railroad v. Lefkowitz

12 N.Y.2d 305 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1963

This holding seems correct under a long line of authorities including Poland v. United Traction Co. ( 177 N. Y. 557 ) and Polley v. Lehigh Val. R. R. Co. ( 200 N. … However, we think the true rule is that stated in Lawson Co. v. *310 Browne ( 266 App.

Germania Savings Bank v. Village of Suspension Bridge

159 N.Y. 362 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1899

Bemis ( 2 Allen, 496 ) ; Ryder v. Wilson (41 N. J. L. 9,11) ; Davis v. Minor ( 2 Miss. 183 ) ; Bradford v. Brooks (2 Aiken, 284) ; Stipp v. Brown ( 2 Ind. 647 ) ; Cooley’s Const. Lim. (5th ed.) 448, 455. … CVo. v. Van Horn, supra, citing Dash v. Van Kleeck, 7 J. R. 499 ; Berley v. Rampacher, 5 Duer, 183 ; Sayre v. Wisner, 8 Wend. 662 ; *370 Palmer v. Conly, 4 Denio, 376 ; Calkins v. Calkins, 3 Barb. 305 ; Jackson v.

In the Matter of Pantelidis v. New York City Board of Standards and Appeals

10 N.Y.3d 846 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 2008

10 N.Y.3d 846 (2008) 889 N.E.2d 474 859 N.Y.S.2d 597 In the Matter of GEORGE PANTELIDIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF STANDARDS AND APPEALS et al., Appellants, and JOSEPH E. … record was sufficiently developed, Supreme Court, after conducting the good faith hearing, properly concluded as a matter of law that petitioner had satisfied the criteria set forth in the Zoning Resolution and that the Board

Suffolk County Water Authority v. Board of Fire Commissioners, Centerport Fire District

59 N.Y.2d 646 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 28, 1983

Delgado v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1

48 N.Y.2d 643 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1979

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs (see Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597 ). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Society of New York Hospital v. New York State Labor Relations Board

34 N.Y.2d 838 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1974

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that, for reasons of public policy this is not a propar case for judgment absolute on stipulation (see, e.g., Weiman v. Weiman, 295 N. Y. 150, 153-154 ; Matter of Decker v. … Judson v. Thacher, 55 N. Y. 525, 537 ; see, generally, Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 286-289; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 5601.13).

Cincinnati National Bank v. Tilden

55 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1893

People Ex Rel. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

224 N.Y. 167 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1918

R’way Co. v. State Board of Tax Commrs., 174 N. Y. 417 ; People ex rel. Harlem River & P. C. R. R. Co. v. State Board of Tax Commrs., 215 N. Y. 507, 511 ; City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Tel. & Tel. Co., 230 U. S. 58 .) … Co. v. State Board of Tax Commrs., 174 N. Y. 417, 437 .)

Town of Riverhead v. New York State Board of Real Property Services

4 N.Y.3d 756 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2005