Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

0.46s

  • Greco v. Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Administrators

    60 N.Y.2d 709 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1983

    would, however, note that in the future the parties would be well advised to reduce such agreements to writing to avoid disputes about the bargain and the exact scope of the assistance required and promised (see People v … Under applicable law, respondent was not bound by the Special Prosecutor’s promises but was only required to give “weighty consideration” to the evidence of petitioner’s cooperation (see Matter of Chaipis v State Liq.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 9th & 10th Street L.L.C. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    9 N.Y.3d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

    Motion by the Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carey v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

    46 N.Y.2d 1068 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1979

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Claim of Adolf v. City of Buffalo Board of Education

    50 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1980

    *873 Board.” … The assignment was wholly unnecessary since the board had a statutory right to reimbursement without, it.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Adam Jay Associates v. Board of Assessors of Nassau

    62 N.Y.2d 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1984

    Corp. v Sexton, 264 App Div 522 ; Real Property Tax Law, § 726). … Co. v Miller, 262 App Div 175 , affd 287 NY 685 ; People ex rel. 342 East 57th St. Corp. v Miller, 262 App Div 132 , affd 287 NY 682 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Winters v. Board of Education of Lakeland Central School District

    99 N.Y.2d 549 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2002

    of petitioner’s statement that he “probably would” act in a similar manner if placed in the same situation, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed * * * shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v … Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]; see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233 [1974]).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Auerbach v. Board of Education of the City School District

    86 N.Y.2d 198 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1995

    Where the terms of a statute are clear and unambiguous, "the court should construe it so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used” (Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 205 , 208). … legislative history will be countenanced only where the language is ambiguous or where a literal construction would lead to absurd or unreasonable consequences that are contrary to the purpose of the enactment (Doctors Council v

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. McCarthy v. Board of Commissioners of Police

    98 N.Y. 332 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885

    The case was afterward brought to trial upon the evidence thus taken, before the whole board, to whom the evidence was submitted and by whom it was examined. … It is sufficient in this case that the evidence at the time it was taken was legally taken, and that it was submitted to and examined by all the members of the board. (People v. Police Commissioners, 93 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Newark Valley Central School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

    83 N.Y.2d 315 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1994

    of Educ. v New York State Pub. … of Educ. v New York State Pub.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents of the University

    296 N.Y. 1027 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1947

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Govel v. Board of Education of the City of Albany

    293 N.Y. 928 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1944

    Loughban, J., dissents from affirmance of judgment against the Board of Education of the City of Albany.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    16 N.Y.2d 779 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1965

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund

    16 N.Y.2d 562 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1965

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • New York Catholic Protectory v. Rockland County

    212 N.Y. 311 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1914

    It is well settled that an audit by a board of supervisors is not open to collateral attack in the absence of fraud or collusion. (People ex rel. Johnson v. Supervisors of Delaware County, 45 N. Y. 196 ; Osterhoudt v. … Brown v. Board of Apportionment, 52 N. Y. 224 ; People ex rel. Myers v. Barnes, 114 N. Y. 317 .)

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • 359 West 34th Street, Inc. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

    305 N.Y. 878 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1953

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lutzker v. Board of Education of City of New York

    287 N.Y. 822 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1942

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7

    176 N.Y. 555 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1903

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Board of Educ. of City of NY v. Hershkowitz

    2 N.Y.3d 759 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2004

    2 N.Y.3d 759 (2004) Board of Educ. of City of N.Y. v. Hershkowitz Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 25, 2004. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed on finality ground.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kabatt v. Board of Education of the City of Elmira

    271 N.Y. 629 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1936

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Garth v. Board of Assessment Review for Town of Richmond

    13 N.Y.3d 176 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 2009

    Supreme Court denied the Board’s motion to dismiss. … Town of Tonawanda Assessor, 309 AD2d 1251 [2003], Iv granted 1 NY3d 507 [2004], appeal withdrawn 3 NY3d 635 [2004]; Matter of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v Board of Assessors of Town of Union, 182 AD2d 970 [3d Dept 1992]; Matter

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.