Case law

New York City School Boards Ass'n v. Board of Education

39 N.Y.2d 111 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1976

Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Bd. v Board of Educ. of City of N. … No. 22 v Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 44 AD2d 713, 714 ).

Carey v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

46 N.Y.2d 1068 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1979

Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft Board

66 N.Y.2d 298 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1985

Regulation J (1) (a), issued by the New York City Loft Board, which permits the landlord of an interim multiple dwelling registered with the Board pursuant to article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law to evict a residential … Secondly, petitioners, relying on the decision in Axelrod Co. v Dixon Studio ( 122 Misc 2d 770 ), the use in section 281 (1) of the phrase "residence or home,” the rule that a statute must be read to give meaning to each

Board of Commissioners of Excise of Delaware County v. Sackrider

35 N.Y. 154 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1866

(Perry v. Tynen, 22 Barb., 137 .) … (Downing v. Rugar, 21 Wend., 178 .)

New York State Crime Victims Board v. Bruce Lorick

11 N.Y.3d 817 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2008

Govel v. Board of Education of the City of Albany

293 N.Y. 928 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1944

Loughban, J., dissents from affirmance of judgment against the Board of Education of the City of Albany.

First National Bank of Ballston Spa v. Board of Supervisors

106 N.Y. 488 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1887

The one emphasized by the appellant is Newman v. Supervisors of Livingston Co. ( 45 N. … In Bridges, Supervisor of the Town of Liberty v. Supervisors of Sullivan Co. ( 92 N.

Figliomeni v. Board of Education of the City School District

38 N.Y.2d 178 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1975

(CPLR 4404; Pfeifer v Empire Merchandising Co., 33 AD2d 565 ; Hempel v Jenkins, 28 AD2d 1086 , affd, 24 NY2d 822 ; Mercado v City of New York 25 AD2d 75 ; see, generally, New Trial as to Damages Only, Ann., 29 ALR2d 1199. … (Bradford v Edmands, 215 Cal App 2d 159, 167; see Brown v Richard H.

Kaufman v. Fallsburg Central School District Board of Education

91 N.Y.2d 57 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1997

Moreover, our decisions, relied upon by the Boron Court, prohibiting retroactive reclassification of tenure areas (see, *64 Matter of Baer v Nyquist, supra, 34 NY2d 291 ; Waiters v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 885 ), dealt with … Thus, Matter of Baer v Nyquist (supra) and Waiters v Board of Educ.

Board of Supervisors of Richmond County v. . Van Clief

60 N.Y. 645 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1875

Affirmed on opinion in Supervisors of Richmond County v. Ellis ( 59 N.Y., 620 ). All concur. Judgment affirmed.

D. M. W. Contracting Co. v. Board of Education

285 N.Y. 591 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1941

People Ex Rel. Babylon Railroad v. Board of Railroad Commissioners

158 N.Y. 711 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 1899

Warney v. Board of Education of School District No. 5

290 N.Y. 329 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1943

(Queck-Berner v. Macy, 240 N. Y. 341, 346 .) … (Sweeny v. Wait, 261 N. Y. 690 ; Hubert v. Tucker, 275 N. Y. 485 .)

Buckbee v. . Board of Education of City of New York

187 N.Y. 544 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1907

Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 6 v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7

176 N.Y. 555 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1903

9th & 10th Street L.L.C. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

9 N.Y.3d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

Motion by the Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.

Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. State Human Rights Appeal Board

47 N.Y.2d 971 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1979

They had purchased round trip tickets and were waiting to board petitioner’s bus. Mrs. … All of these findings were affirmed by the Human Rights Appeal Board.

Auerbach v. Board of Education of the City School District

86 N.Y.2d 198 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1995

Where the terms of a statute are clear and unambiguous, "the court should construe it so as to give effect to the plain meaning of the words used” (Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 205 , 208). … legislative history will be countenanced only where the language is ambiguous or where a literal construction would lead to absurd or unreasonable consequences that are contrary to the purpose of the enactment (Doctors Council v

Winters v. Board of Education of Lakeland Central School District

99 N.Y.2d 549 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2002

of petitioner’s statement that he “probably would” act in a similar manner if placed in the same situation, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed * * * shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v … Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]; see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233 [1974]).

People Ex Rel. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Brown

220 N.Y. 591 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1917