Case law

Seacoast Builders, Inc. v. Howell Township Board of Education

315 N.J. Super. 442 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1997

. *447 Board of Ed. of City of Asbury Park v. Hoek, 38 N.J. 213, 231 , 183 A.2d 633 (1962). … Somers Construction Co. v. Board of Education For the Southern Gloucester County Regional High School District, 198 F.Supp. 732, 736 (D.C.N.J.1961).

Randolph Township Board of Education v. Randolph Education Ass'n

328 N.J. Super. 540 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 2000

This is the second appeal regarding the dispute between appellant, the Randolph Township Board of Education (Board) and respondent, the Randolph Education Association. … Scotch Plains-Fanwood Bd. of Educ. v. Educ. Ass’n, 139 N.J. 141, 152-53 , 651 A.2d 1018 (1995); Board of Educ. of Township of Bernards v. Bernards Township Educ. Ass’n, 79 N.J. 311, 318-21 , 399 A.2d 620 (1979).

Schults v. Bd. of Ed. of Teaneck

86 N.J. Super. 29 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 18, 1964

See Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); N.J. Const. Art. I, par. 5; N.J.S.A. 18:14-2, 18:25-4, 18:25-5. … The development of the law in the area of school segregation, whether intentional or de facto, has moved logically forward from Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).

Gamrin v. Mayor and Council of Englewood

76 N.J. Super. 555 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 22, 1962

Lasher for the defendant Bergen County Clerk. *557 BROWN, G.H., J.C.C. (temporarily assigned). … The principle for judicial guidance was spelled out by the Appellate Division in Santoro v. South Plainfield, 57 N.J.

Blinn v. Board of Trustees of the Public Employees' Retirement System

173 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1980

The phrase “leave of absence” itself “connotes a continuity of the employment status,” Roche v. Board of Review, 156 N.J.Super. 63, 65 (App.Div.1978); Bowers v. … Accordingly, the determination of the Board of Trustees is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions that appellant’s membership in P.E.R.S. be restored and reactivated as of June 20, 1977, at the same rate of contribution

Lambertville Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners

153 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1977

J. 82; State v. N. J. Bell Tel. Co., supra. … [Hackensack Water Co. v. Pub. Utility Bd., 96 N. J.

Hillman/Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists

169 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1979

Such “guild” legislation was not within the Board’s statutory power to regulate the profession in the best interest of the public. Id. at 233. See also, Bresler v. Tietjen, Mo., 424 S. … App. 1975); Florida Ass’n of Dispensing Opticians v. Florida State Bd. of Optometry, 227 So. 2d 736 (Ct. App. 1969); State Bd. of Optometry v. Chester, 251 Miss. 250 , 169 So. 2d 468 (Sup. Ct. 3964) ; High v.

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Warren

386 N.J. Super. 194 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 2006

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, 159 N.J. 565, 568 , 732 A.2d 1053 (1999) (citing Law Revision Commission Comment to N.J.S.A. 2B:5-1). … Loigman v. Tp. Com. of Middletown, 297 N.J.Super. 287, 299 , 687 A.2d 1091 (App.Div.1997). See also Cohen v.

Freidus v. Kaufman

35 N.J. Super. 601 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1955

William Elmer Brown, Jr., attorney for defendant Martin Shamberg ( Messrs. Brown & Frank, attorneys). HANEMAN, J.S.C. … Donohue v. Campbell, 98 N.J.L. 755 ( E. & A. 1923); In re Webster Loose Leaf Filing Co., 240 F. 779 ( D.C.N.J. 1916); Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co., 80 N.J. Eq. 122 ( Ch. 1912); Wells v.

Johns-Manville v. Bd. of Review

122 N.J. Super. 366 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 9, 1973

Bunny's Waffle Shop v. California Employment Com'n, 24 Cal. 2d 735 , 151 P. 2d 224, 228 (Sup. Ct. 1944); Robertson v. Brown, 139 So. 2d 226 (La. Ct. App. 1962); Pacific Mills v. Director of Division of Employ. … It is clear from the Board's findings that work offered by appellant was not "suitable" within the meaning of the cited section. Wojcik v. Bd. of Review, supra, 58 N.J. at 345 ; Dubkowski v. Administrator, Unemploy.

Aparin v. County of Gloucester

345 N.J. Super. 24 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 29, 2001

Wagner, Jr., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER and Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County, Defendants/Appellants. … County of Gloucester and Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County, Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellants, v.

HARE EX REL. HARE v. Pennell

37 N.J. Super. 558 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 1955

Brown argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Brown, Connery, Kulp & Wille, attorneys). Mr. Sidney P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys). … Our courts have also held that our statute was not intended to give a new right of action to an injured party against a school board. Tripus v. Peterson, 11 N.J. Super. 282 ( Cty. Ct. 1950); cf. Thompson v.

Deptford Township Board of Health v. Deptford Township Mayor

200 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1985

The board first argues that it has the authority to pass this ordinance under the broad grant of powers given to it by the Board of Health Act (act). N.J.S.A. 26:3-1 et seq. See Zullo v. … The board’s second argument is that the council may not arbitrarily refuse to appropriate money for the items set forth in the board’s budget. The board relies upon the case of Grosso v.

Planning Board of Leonia v. Borough Council of Leonia

222 N.J. Super. 207 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 1987

Savoia v. F.W. Woolworth Co., 88 N.J.Super. 153, 161-164 (App.Div.1965). All of the board’s duties routinely require the advice of an engineer. Garofalo v. Burlington Tp., 212 N.J.Super. 458, 463 (Law Div.1985). … The council may not usurp the board’s separately delegated power of appointment by failing to continue funding the position of board engineer. Cf. Grosso v.

State of New Jersey v. Marquise Brown

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 2026

State v. Brown, No. A-2408-19 (App. Div. March 15, 2022). Our Supreme Court denied petition for certification. State v. Brown, 252 N.J. 602 (2023). … State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 606 (1990) (quoting United States v. Berkowitz, 662 F.2d 1127, 1134 (5th Cir. 1981)).

Plainfield Ass'n of School Administrators v. Board of Education

187 N.J. Super. 11 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 1982

Assn. v. Dunellen Bd. of Ed., 64 N.J. 17, 25 (1973) and Englewood Bd. of Ed. v. Englewood Teachers Ass’n, 64 N.J. 1, 7 (1973), and today reaffirmed in State v. … Obviously, a board of education will be discouraged from making personnel transfers if the board will be compelled to pay additional compensation to make the transfer. This very case will illustrate the point.

Warren County Community College v. Warren County Board of Chosen Freeholders

350 N.J. Super. 489 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 2002

In Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. … See, e.g., Amoresano v.

Monroe Township Board of Adjustment v. Mayor & Township Committee

211 N.J. Super. 174 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1986

Furthermore, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-71, a governing body may not deny separate legal representation to a board of adjustment, if it is so requested. De Luca v. … boards of adjustment] are regularly guided by an attorney.

Edison Township Board of Education v. Edison Township Principals & Supervisors Ass'n

304 N.J. Super. 459 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 1997

Board of Review, 124 N.J. 425, 437 , 591 A.2d 605 (1991) (citing Mayflower Sec. Co. v. … Ass’n v. Board of Educ., 96 N.J. 587, 593 [ 476 A.2d 1245 ] (1984).

Lars M. Brown v. Elizabeth K. Byham

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 2025

BROWN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ELIZABETH K. … Brown, respondent pro se.