Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.63s

  • Society Hill at Piscataway Condominium Ass'n v. Township of Piscataway

    445 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 2016

    Bank, N.A. v. Hough, 210 N.J. 187, 199 , 42 A.3d 870 (2012); see Bedford v. Riello, 195 N.J. 210, 221-222 , 948 A.2d 1272 (2008). The paramount goal is to ascertain the intent of the drafter. DiProspero v. … Urban League of Greater New Brunswick v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nat.-Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Camden Trust Co.

    36 N.J. Super. 249 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1955

    Err. 1947); Ex Parte County Board of Education, 260 Ky. 246 , 84 S.W. 2 d 59 ( Ct. App. 1935); Stavros v. Bradley, 313 Ky. 676 , 232 S.W. 2 d 1004 ( Ct. App. 1950); Beach v. … Greenebaum Tanning Co. v. National Labor R. Board, 129 F. 2 d 487 (7 th Cir. 1942), dealing with a special situation.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Nadelson v. Township of Millburn

    297 N.J. Super. 549 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 1996

    In Riggs v. … In Brill v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • 1643 Atlantic Avenue Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    81 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 14, 1963

    Appellant is the holder of a retail consumption liquor license issued by the Board of Commissioners of Atlantic City. … See also Kravis v. Hock, *150 135 N. J. L. 259 (Sup. Ct. 1947), reversed 136 N. J. L. 161 (E. & A. 1947).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Testa v. Town of Bloomfield

    71 N.J. Super. 66 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1961

    See Olsen v. Borough of Fair Haven, 64 N. J. Super. 90, 95-96 (App. *69 Div. 1960). See also, Robbins v. Jersey City, 23 N. … S. 40:73-5 states: “The board of commissioners shall determine the powers and duties to be performed by each department and shall assign such powers and duties to each department as it may deem appropriate.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SHARONDA ALLEN v. EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, ETC. (C-000052-20, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 2022

    Brown, 232 N.J. 114, 126-27 (2018); Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 199, 215 (2014). On the other hand, "[j]udicial review of an arbitration award is very limited." Bound Brook Bd. of Educ. v. … New York v. Bock, 38 N.J. 500, 522 (1962). See also Borough of Ho-ho-kus v. Menduno, 91 N.J. Super. 482, 485 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of New Jersey v. Rahjiv Smith

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 6, 2026

    Later that night, after consuming alcohol and PCP, defendant, Nunez, and Brown walked together outside Smith's home. While Nunez and Brown walked ahead, a single gunshot was fired, and Brown fell to the ground. … See, e.g., State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. McNally

    91 N.J. Super. 513 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1966

    His appeal is based upon the proposition, quoting from State Board of Medical Examiners v. Weiner, 68 N. J. Super. 468 (App. … In State Board of Medical Examiners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Bernards Township

    9 N.J. Tax 636 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1987

    Plaintiffs both appealed their 1983 assessments to the Somerset County Board of Taxation, which affirmed. … See also Hackensack Water Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Holmin v. TRW, INC.

    330 N.J. Super. 30 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 2000

    Plaintiff's citation of Nissman v. Board of Education, supra, is also unpersuasive. That case involved an unusual chronology in a tenure dispute. … A State Board of Education regulation, N.J.A.C. 6:24-1.2(c), barred any challenge to a local *1153 board order if the challenge was not filed within ninety days of receipt of the order.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Lindel Realty Company v. Miller

    4 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1949

    Barnett v. Johnson, 15 N.J. Eq. 481 ( E. A. 1863). … Co. v. Hannon, 37 N.J.L. 276 ( Sup. Ct. 1875); Manufacturers Land, etc., Co. v. Board, 98 N.J.L. 638 ; affirmed, 101 N.J.L. 224 (1925).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RALPH KIETT, JR. (85-04-0588 AND 85-04-0589, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 7, 2022

    . _______________________ Argued November 10, 2021 – Decided July 7, 2022 Before Judges Fuentes, Gilson and Gooden Brown. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Automatic Laundries, Inc. v. Bayonne Housing Authority

    45 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 1957

    Automatic Voting Machine Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County, 120 N.J.L. 264 ( Sup. Ct. 1938). … Rose v. Board of Education of East Orange, 39 N.J. Super. 565 ( Law Div. 1956). Therefore, it is clear that the plaintiff was entitled to a hearing before a valid contract could be awarded. Sellitto v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ellison v. Schenck, Price, Smith & King

    280 N.J. Super. 169 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1995

    In fact, a partner of defendant was a member of the cemetery's board of trustees. … Ellison v. Evergreen, supra, 266 N.J. Super. at 78 , 628 A. 2d 793 ; Isko v. Planning Bd. of Twp. of Livingston, 51 N.J. 162, 175 , 238 A. 2d 457 (1968). Affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lom-Ran Corp. v. Dept. of Environmental Protection

    163 N.J. Super. 376 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1978

    State v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., supra, 100 N.J. Super. at 382 . See State, Morford v. Board of Health, 61 N.J.L. 386, 389 (Sup. Ct. 1898). … In LaSalle National Bank v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Howarth v. Borough of Wenonah

    67 N.J. Super. 161 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 14, 1961

    The court in Cirasella v. Village of South Orange, 57 N. J. Super. 522 (App. … Ct. 1891) ; Ringer v. City of Paterson, 98 N. J. L. 455 (E. & A. 1923) ; Gorab v. Wood-Ridge, 133 N. J. L. 162 (Sup. Ct. 1945).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rowson v. Township Committee of Mantua

    171 N.J. Super. 129 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1979

    Prior expressions of this court on the power of a governing body to place a question on the ballot pursuant to N.J.S.A. 19:37-1 are found in Santoro v. South Plainfield, 57 N.J.Super. 498 (App.Div.1959), and Botkin v. … Board members are elected in special elections; school taxes are separately levied.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Dutton

    112 N.J. Super. 402 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1970

    State v. Currie, 41 N.J. 531 (1964). … Brown, 217 Pa. Super. 190 , 269 A. 2d 383 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970), that Coleman is not to be applied retroactively.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Village Supermarkets, Inc. v. West Orange Tp.

    206 N.J. Super. 597 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 9, 1986

    Plaintiff appealed to the Essex County Board of Taxation from both the 1979 and 1980 assessments. … See, respectively, Marcus Hook Development Park v. Board, 68 Pa.Commw. 229, 449 A. 2d 70 (Commw.Ct. 1982); Lerner Shops of Connecticut v. Town of Waterbury, 151 Conn. 79 , 193 A. 2d 472 (1963).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kugler v. Tiller

    127 N.J. Super. 468 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1974

    Tiller from his office as a member and director of the Board of Chosen Freeholders (Board) of Union County for allegedly refusing to testify before the grand jury of that county in an investigation being conducted into matters … The invalidity of such provision was foreshadowed in Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 , 87 S.Ct. 616 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 562 (1967). In Gardner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.