Case law

Rozmierski v. City of Newark

42 N.J. Super. 14 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 1956

Defendant cites only two cases in support of its position — DeMarco v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County, 21 N.J. 136 (1956), and Winne v. Bergen County, 21 N.J. 311 (1956). … Board of Education of City of Garfield v. State Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 388 ( Sup. Ct. 1943); Marjon v. Altman, 120 N.J.L. 16 ( Sup. Ct. 1938); Glori v. Board of Police Commissioners, 72 N.J.L. 131 ( Sup.

Leoni v. Tp. of Hamilton

134 N.J. Super. 231 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 1975

The pension board involved rejected the claim on the ground that the disability was not a direct result of a traumatic event pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:16A-7(1). See Shea v. Bd. of Trustees, 116 N.J. Super. 348 (App. … Div. 1971); Hillman v. Bd. of Trustees, 109 N.J. Super. 449 (App. Div. 1970); Titman v. Bd. of Trustees, 107 N.J. Super. 244 (App. Div. 1969).

Central Home Trust Co. v. Gough

5 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 1949

Justice Holmes pointed out that decisions by the Immigration Board which were required to be made promptly and in somewhat summary fashion "cannot constitute res judicata in a technical sense," and Wilbur v. … See Wallace Corp. v. National Lab. Rel. Bd., 323 U.S. 248 (1944); rehearing denied, 324 U.S. 885 (1945). However, in National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore T.

FAIR LAWN BD. OF EDN. v. Fair Lawn Plaza Taxi, Inc.

55 N.J. Super. 357 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 1959

Super. 357 (1959) 150 A.2d 793 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FAIR LAWN PLAZA TAXI, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … The obligation created was described in Lupfer & Remick v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic County, 87 N.J.

RL v. State-Operated Sch. Dist.

387 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 2006

(discussing liability of boarding school pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:61B-1a(1)), aff'd as modified, 188 N.J. 69 , 74-75, 902 A. 2d 900 (2006); Cosgrove v. … NOTES [1] Improperly pleaded as Newark Board of Education.

Thiokol Chem. Corp. v. MORRIS COUNTY BD. OF TAX.

76 N.J. Super. 232 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 6, 1962

Super. 232 (1962) 184 A.2d 75 THIOKOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. MORRIS COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, TOWNSHIP OF DENVILLE, AND J. … See also State Board of Assessors v. Central R.R. Co., 48 N.J.L. 146 ( E. & A. 1886); Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N.J.L. 353 ( E. & A. 1941); Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 133 N.J.L. 202 ( Sup. Ct. 1945).

Privetera v. Hillcrest Homes, Inc.

29 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1954

Super. 591 (1954) 103 A.2d 55 THOMAS PRIVETERA, PLAINTIFF, v. HILLCREST HOMES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, SALVATORE BONGIORNO AND WEST NEW YORK STAIR BUILDING COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS. … This is an action on petition to impress an attorney's lien upon that portion of the monies received in a third party action as represents the amount of an award by the Workmen's Compensation Board of the State of New York

Playhouse v. Millburn Township

188 N.J. Super. 18 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1982

Williams Co. v. … See, also, Stockton Civic Theatre v. Board of Supervisors, 66 Cal.2d 13 , 423 P.2d 810 , 56 Cal.Rptr. 658 (Sup.Ct.1967); Department of Rev. v.

Lavino v. Lavino

41 N.J. Super. 608 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1956

Super. 608 (1956) 125 A.2d 746 ANNA LAVINO, PLAINTIFF, v. LIBERO LAVINO (ALSO KNOWN AS LEO LAVINO), JOSEPH CATTANEO AND MARGARET L. CATTANEO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. … Thereafter, on March 22, 1949 she obtained from him a divorce from bed and board. On October 29, 1954 the defendant Lavino became seized of the property in question under the will of his father Eligio Lavino.

McGinnis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Etc., Clerks

75 N.J. Super. 517 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1962

Article V of that agreement provided for a complete grievance procedure, in three steps, leading up to the National Railroad Adjustment Board. … Moore v. Illinois Central R.R. Co ., above. And see the interpretation given the Moore holding in Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W.R. Co ., and Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Day , above.

Paramus Substantive Certification No. 47

249 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 1991

Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. 108 N.J. 123, 128-129 , 527 A.2d 1368 (1987); Miller v. Mitchell, 245 N.J.Super. 290, 300 , 585 A.2d 414 (App.Div.1991). … Gibbons v. Gibbons, 86 N.J. 515, 521-522 , 432 A. 2d 80 (1981).

Snedeker v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Emp. SEC.

139 N.J. Super. 394 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1976

Co. v. Board of *407 Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949). In short, there are no distinctions between State plan and private plans that justify this inequality of treatment. Compare, WHYY, Inc. v. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949), is inapposite. There industrial life insurance agents were included within the coverage of the Unemployment Compensation Act, while other industrial insurance agents were not.

Bergen Commun. College Trustees v. JP FYFE

188 N.J. Super. 288 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 1982

Super. 288 (1982) 457 A.2d 83 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, PLAINTIFF, v. J.P. FYFE, INC., JOHN DELAGE, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION AND COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS. … The argument on behalf of plaintiff that it, as a county college, is different from a welfare board; and 2.

Anthony v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

51 N.J. Super. 139 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1958

Chinn v. China National Aviation Corporation, 138 Cal. App. 2 d 98, 291 P. 2 d 91 ( D. Ct. App. 1955); Hunter v. Sparling, 87 Cal. App. 2 d 711, 197 P. 2 d 807 ( D. Ct. App. 1948); Bullock v. Sterling Drug, 93 F. … Consequently the promulgation of this plan did not require any concurrence by the board of directors.

Chez Sez VIII, Inc. v. Poritz

297 N.J. Super. 331 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 1997

Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969) (wearing black arm bands); Brown v. … Playtime Theatres, Inc., supra, 475 U.S. at 48, 106 S.Ct. at 929 , 89 L.Ed.2d at 38 (quoting Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

State v. Robinson

139 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1976

State v. Gardner, 51 N.J. 444, 457-459 (1968); State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 410-411 (1956). … Brown, supra, 22 N.J. at 410 ), possibly even animated by anger or hatred (see State v. Huff, supra, 14 N.J. at 249 ).

Hall v. Mayor & Director of Public Safety of Pennsauken

170 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 8, 1979

Petitte, against the Camden County Welfare Board to ascertain whether any police officer of the Pennsauken Police Department had applied for welfare assistance. … In Pickering a schoolteacher, in a published letter, criticized the action of the board of education.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KEVIN BROWN (08-12-2199, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 2018

Fritz, 105 N.J. 42 (1987), as supplemented by Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 366 (2010) and State v. … [State v. McQuaid, 147 N.J. 464, 485 (1997) (quoting State v. Mitchell, 126 N.J. 565, 575-76 (1992)).]

Communications Workers of America AFL-CIO v. Clymer

292 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 1996

Warnock Ryan Leasing v. State, Dept. of Treasury, 194 N.J.Super. 11 [ 475 A.2d 1270 ] (App.Div.1984); KSB Technical Sales v. No. Jersey Dist. … Cedar Cove, Inc. v.

Medinets v. Hansen

31 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1954

Super. 102 (1954) 106 A.2d 39 ALFRED MEDINETS, HELEN MEDINETS AND GRETA FRANKL, TRADING AS FRANKL SCHOOL OF MUSIC, PLAINTIFFS, v. OTTO HANSEN, HERBERT J. … The plaintiffs did not appeal to the board of Adjustment, but brought this action as a direct appeal from the building inspector's action.