Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.64s

  • Naylor v. Conroy

    46 N.J. Super. 387 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 20, 1957

    Swann v. Swann, 21 Fed. 299 ( C.C.E.D. Ark., 1884); O'Rourke v. O'Rourke, 43 Mich. 58 , 4 N.W. 531 ( Mich. Sup. Ct. 1880). See Lovell v. Boston & M.R. Co., 75 N.H. 568 , 78 A. 621 , 34 L.R.A., N.S., 67, 72. In Brown v. … Browning, 15 R.I. 422 , 7 A. 403 (1886), the Supreme Court of Rhode Island, in referring to the cases of Adams v. Gay, 19 Vt. 358 , and Swann v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Snow v. Bell

    105 N.J. Super. 484 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1969

    Weiner v. Board of Com’rs of City of Perth Amboy, 106 N. J. L. 276 (Sup. Ct. 1930); Perry v. Borough of Deal, 103 N. J. L. 310 (Sup. Ct. 1926), affirmed 104 N. J. L. 182 (E. & A. 1927); Whetling v. … Weiner v. Perth Amboy, Perry v. Deal and, Wethling v. Orange, all supra, make it clear that the fact that N. J. S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Delaney v. Penza

    151 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1977

    See Johnson v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 131 N.J. Super. 513 (App. Div. 1974), certif. den. 67 N.J. 94 (1975), and cases cited therein. See also, Edmond v. Dept. of the Public Advocate, 137 N.J. Super. 82 (App. … Johnson v. N.J. State Parole Board, supra, 131 N.J. Super. at 520 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Atlantic City v. BD. OF COMM'RS OF ATLANTIC CITY

    138 N.J. Super. 595 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 1976

    BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, JOSEPH F. … [Emphasis supplied] [1] On December 4, 1969 the board of commissioners enacted Ordinance No. 38 of 1969, providing that the salaries of the mayor and board of commissioners should be $21,000 and $18,500, respectively.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Township of North Bergen v. Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission

    200 N.J. Super. 579 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1985

    Redevelopment Agency v. … See Murnick v. Asbury Park, 95 N.J. 452 (1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woodcliff Management v. Township of North Bergen

    106 N.J. Super. 292 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1969

    We approve the decision and supporting reasoning of Judge Pindar for the Law Division in 713 Co. v. Jersey City, 94 N. J. … See Riverview Gardens v. North Arlington Borough, 9 N. J. 167 (1952). We of course imply no view as to the merits of either of such contentions when and if advanced before the Division.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Too Much Media, LLC v. Hale

    413 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2010

    She identified the Pornafia website as an "information exchange," and later described it alternatively as a "bulletin board" or "message board." … Co. v. Board of Educ., 198 F.Supp. 732, 734 (D.N.J.1961). For purposes of analysis plaintiffs are entitled to every reasonable inference of fact. Independent Dairy Workers Union v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re Freshwater Gen. Permit No. 7

    405 N.J. Super. 204 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2009

    In 1987, the Medford Township Planning Board (Board) approved Barresi's application to subdivide one of his lots to construct a 35,400 square foot warehouse. … Ass'n v. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs, 186 N.J. 5, 15 , 890 A. 2d 922 (2006); In re Taylor, 158 N.J. 644, 656 , 731 A. 2d 35 (1999); Brady v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • City of Paterson v. Paterson General Hospital

    97 N.J. Super. 514 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 25, 1967

    J. v. Richman, 41 N. J. Super. 259 (Ch. … An interesting case on its facts is Bryan v. Board of Education, 151 U. S. 639 , 14 S. Ct. 465 , 38 L. Ed. 297 (1894).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Donato v. Moldow

    374 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 2005

    See Carafano v. … In Batzel v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Shupack v. Manasquan River Regional Sewerage

    194 N.J. Super. 199 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 13, 1984

    "... consider any comments which the Planning Board may have on the subject pumping station site plan and construction details." … Manage. v. Rent Control Bd. of W. New York, 71 N.J. 451 (1976).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Nellom

    354 N.J. Super. 485 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 24, 2002

    Brown, 72 Mich.App. 7 , 248 N.W.2d 695 (1976) (failure to advise defendant of right to hearing on the violation charge rendered the waiver involuntary and unknowing). 3 In response to our invitation to brief the issue of … See, e.g., R. 3:9—3(f); State v. Brown, 352 N.J.Super. 338, 350-51 , 800 A.2d 189 (App.Div.2002).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Casella Farms Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Mayor and Township Committee of the Township of Harrison

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 31, 2024

    . _______________________________ Argued September 9, 2024 – Decided October 31, 2024 Before Judges Gooden Brown and Vanek. … In Willoughby v. Planning Board, 306 N.J. Super. 266 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Goldhaber v. Kohlenberg

    395 N.J. Super. 380 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 2007

    This on-line bulletin board was called the Crew Members Forum. … Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Burkhart v. Public Employees Retirement System

    158 N.J. Super. 414 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1978

    Thereafter, in February 1976 the PEES Board denied Garofalo’s application under N. J. S. … Caronia v. Orange Police and Fire Pension Comm’n, 18 N. J. Super. 149, 153 (App. Div. 1952); Bahrle v. Mirabelli, 107 N. J. Super. 361, 370-371 (Law Div. 1969); Linden Bd. of Ed. v. Liekman, 56 N. J. Super. 566 (Ch.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • AMADA SANJUAN v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WEST NEW YORK, HUDSON COUNTY (C-000030-21, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 25, 2022

    A-3273-20 AMADA SANJUAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … A-3273-20 8 Linden Board of Education v. Linden Education Association ex rel. Mizichko, 202 N.J. 268 (2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James Petrozello Co., Inc. v. Chatham Tp.

    75 N.J. Super. 173 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1962

    Phifer v. Bayonne, supra, 105 N.J.L., at p. 527 . Invitations for bids in the form of unit prices, under proper circumstances, are not objectionable. Browning v. … Browning v. Freeholders of Bergen, supra . The giving of the estimates is for the express purpose of forming a basis for the "uniform comparison of bids." Walter v. McClellan, 113 App. Div. 295 , 99 N.Y.S. 78, 79 ( App.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Arthur v. St. Peters Hospital

    169 N.J. Super. 575 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 30, 1979

    Mduba v. Benedictine Hospital, 52 A.D. 2d 450 , 384 N.Y.S. 2d 527, 529 (App. Div. 1976), Brown v. Moore, 247 F. 2d 711 , 719 (3 Cir.1957); Mehlman v. Powell, 281 Md. 269 , 378 A. 2d 1121, 1124 (Ct. … Such patients are not bound by secret limitations as are contained in a private contract between the hospital and the doctor. * * * [ 384 N.Y.S. 2d at 529 ; citations omitted] Similarly, in Brown v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Cano v. Malone

    237 N.J. Super. 272 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1989

    In Diamond v. N.J. … Dacunzo v. Edgye, 19 N.J. 443, 451 (1956).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J.S. and S.S., Etc. v. Board of Education of the West Morris Regional High School District, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 2025

    Theodore v. Dover Bd. of Educ., 183 N.J. Super. 407, 412-13 (App. Div. 1982) (quoting Hinfey v. Matawan Reg'l Bd. of Educ., 77 N.J. 514, 525 (1978)). … The Board cites Kopera v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.