Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.40s
W. CHARLES NIESSNER v. RICHARD C. LUNEMANN (L-3587-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 2022
Generally, conduct must be "both 'injurious and transgressive of generally accepted standards of common morality or of law'" to qualify. Lamorte Burns, 167 N.J. at 306 (quoting Harper-Lawrence, Inc. v. … But our review of the record finds no decision to exclude the evidence and the court clearly heard the relevant testimony and was never asked and never made any ruling to exclude any of it.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished1650 Corporate Road West, LLC v. the Township Committee of the Township of Lakewood
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 30, 2026
A-4035-23 30 Nor is there anything in the record demonstrating this case qualifies for an enlargement of the forty-five-day requirement under Rule 4:69-6(c). … Further, the judge noted the time limit was established "prior to opening the public comment portion of the meeting and was applied to all parties."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANNA N. TALIAFERRO(10-12-0179, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 2017
Pursuant to N.J.R.E. 702, "[i]f scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, … incarceration or extended imprisonment for the purposes of general deterrence is not warranted"); N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1(f)(2) (allowing sentencing courts to downgrade convictions for sentencing purposes where the court is clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Ronald J. Teschner
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 1, 2025
Defendant's intention was to go to a rehab facility to establish an alibi. Smith also said defendant was concerned about scratches on his arms that police had photographed after arresting him . … If I do not believe that . . . is going to happen, then clearly he will sit out the balance of our work together.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EDWIN ESTRADA (11-03-0444, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 2018
Simring, who the court qualified as an expert in forensic psychiatry, testified on behalf of the State. Dr. Simring disputed Dr. Eshkenazi's conclusions, particularly that defendant suffered from bipolar disorder. … the decision to reassess the plea should be reviewed for plain error, 17 A-2078-14T3 pursuant to which any error should be disregarded unless "clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Rashad A. Zeigler
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 2025
They were further instructed that "[p]articipation and agreement can be established from conduct as well as the spoken word." … Nor does the record establish how Gibson or her son's addresses were relevant considering they did not testify.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 2023
the record to support the findings upon which the agency based [its] application of legislative policies; and (3) whether, in applying the legislative policies to the facts, the agency clearly … They argue that the Loop does not qualify for a waiver of the standard transition area A-1897-21 46
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLANE BAJARDI VS. NANCY PINCUS (L-3723-12, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 2019
Pincus testified that the post was based upon her reasonable beliefs, and not upon facts established through investigation. … Through his confrontational style, by the tone and manner of his discourse at city council and board of education meetings, and through his internet commentary, Bajardi quite clearly thrust himself into the vortex of Hoboken
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 12, 2022
Typically, as to this prong, "the [Division] . . . offer[s] testimony of a well[- ]qualified expert who has had [a] full opportunity to make a comprehensive, objective, and informed evaluation of the child's relationship … Indeed, the record establishes they received adequate procedural protections, including fair notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 2019
The record must "adequately establish[]" the juror's inability to continue. Valenzuela, 136 N.J. at 472-73. … The verdict returned in this matter clearly showed that the jury believed Adams to be the less culpable of the two. VI.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna