Case law

Cohen v. Prudential Ins. Co.

58 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 30, 1959

They are similar, however, in that the amount paid is discretionary with the corporation's board of directors both as to time and manner of payment. 13 Am. Jur., Corporations, sec. 645, p. 637; Murray v. … When and under what circumstances the courts will interfere with the exercise of the discretion of the board of directors in the conduct or management of a business is stated in Blanchard v. Prudential Ins.

Middlesex County Health Department v. Middlesex County Utilities Authority

260 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1992

See Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, supra. Moreover, it would introduce an element of disruption into the statute’s administrative scheme. See Mack Paramus Co. v. … In Dome Realty, Inc. v.

State v. Warren

173 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 1980

State v. Tonghanni, 96 N.J.L. 63 (Sup.Ct.1921). The offense was cpmplete if the burglar was apprehended in the process of entering, as often happens. … State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 591 (1979).

Ramundo v. Turi

92 N.J. Super. 73 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 1966

Super. 73 (1966) 222 A.2d 189 JOSEPH RAMUNDO, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD RAMUNDO, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. *74 Mr. John T. Mooney argued the cause for defendants-appellants ( Messrs. Hein, Smith & Mooney, attorneys). Mr. Adolph A.

In re Dreyer

356 N.J. Super. 159 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 2002

Lane v. Holderman, 23 N.J. 304, 322 , 129 A.2d 8 (1957). … Merin v. Maglaki 126 N.J. 430, 437 , 599 A.2d 1256 (1992). Moreover, “[a]n appellate tribunal is ... in no way bound by the agency’s interpretation of a statute____” Mayflower Sec. v.

Ferraro v. City of Long Branch

314 N.J. Super. 268 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 1998

In Pillsbury v. Board, of Chosen Freeholders of Monmouth County, 133 N.J.Super. 526, 529 , 337 A.2d 632 (Law Div.1975), aff'd o.b., 140 N.J.Super. 410 , 356 A.2d 424 (App.Div.1976), John M. … Board of County Comm'rs v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675 , 116 S.Ct. 2342, 2347 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843, 851 (1996).

Gerber v. BD., ETC., NJ DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUS.

36 N.J. Super. 322 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1955

Ablondi v. Board of Review , above; Lawrence Baking Co. v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation Commission, 308 Mich. 198 , 13 N.W. 2 d 260, 154 A.L.R. 660 ( Sup. … Magner v. Kinney , above; Fash v. Gordon, 398 Ill. 210 , 75 N.E. 2 d 294 ( Sup. Ct. 1947); Midvale Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 165 Pa. Super. 359 , 67 A. 2 d 380 ( Super. Ct. 1949).

BARRY HIRSCHBERG v. BOROUGH OF NORTHVALE (C-000102-19, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 2022

A-0606-19 BARRY HIRSCHBERG and ELIZABETH HIRSCHBERG, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Respondents, v. … See McDaniel v. Man Wai Lee, 419 N.J. Super. 482, 497-98 (App. Div. 2011).

Vitty v. DCP CORP.

268 N.J. Super. 447 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1993

Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus., 103 N.J. 177, 191 , 510 A. 2d 1152 (1986) (citing Cozzi v. Owens Corning Fiber Glass Corp., 63 N.J. Super. 117, 121 , 164 A. 2d 69 (App.Div. 1960); Longi v. … Ramos v. Browning Ferris Indus., 103 N.J. at 191 , 510 A. 2d 1152 .

Nj Farm Bureau v. East Amwell

380 N.J. Super. 325 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 22, 2005

Johnston, Perehinys Farm and Mary Perehinys, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF EAST AMWELL and Township of East Amwell Planning Board, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … See Kirby v. Twp. Comm. of Bedminster, 341 N.J.Super. 276, 286-89 , 775 A. 2d 209 (App.Div.2000); Mount Olive Complex v.

Hungerford & Terry, Inc. v. Geschwindt

27 N.J. Super. 515 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 1953

Super. 515 (1953) 99 A.2d 666 HUNGERFORD & TERRY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRIS D. GESCHWINDT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 28, 1953. … Brown, attorney). Mr. Wilfred B. Wolcott argued the cause for defendants-appellants, Class B stockholders. *516 Mr. Thomas M. Farr argued the cause for defendants Grace Elizabeth Hungerford Hillman, et al. ( Messrs.

Hughes v. Eisner

14 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 1951

Brown v. Bulkley, 14 N.J. Eq. 451, at 458 ( Ch. 1862). This principle was applied by our court of last resort, in a case where the client had transferred land to his attorney as security for the amount due him. … In Kelley v. Schwinghammer, 78 N.J. Eq. 437 ( Ch. 1911), the attorney had begun an action at law on a promissory note given him by his client in settlement of legal services. Acting on the principle of Brown v.

Pollinger v. Loigman

256 N.J. Super. 257 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 29, 1992

Loigman v. Merit System Board, Docket No. A-3612-90T1. … The fact that the disputed statement was not filed before the final authority, the Merit System Board itself, is irrelevant. In Devlin v. Greiner, 147 N.J.

In re the Comprehensive Investigation of the School District of Newark

276 N.J. Super. 354 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1994

Cain v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 78 N.J. 253, 255 , 394 A.2d 327 (1978). … See e.g., United States v. Antonick, 481 F.2d 935, 937 (9th Cir.)

State v. Badr

415 N.J. Super. 455 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 2010

(quoting Brown v. City of Newark, 113 N.J. 565, 572 , 552 A. 2d 125 (1989)); see also Singer v. Twp. of Princeton, 373 N.J.Super. 10, 20 , 860 A. 2d 475 (App.Div.2004). … Similarly, in State v.

Mutschler v. DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION

337 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2001

Pascucci v. … Courts extend substantial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations, DiMaria v. Board of Trs. of Publ. Employees' Ret.

MIDDLESEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICER THALIA TRETSIS VS. POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 2020

In support of its position, the Board also cited to our decision in Ensslin v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 311 N.J. Super. 333 (App. Div. 1998). … Patterson v. Bd. of Trs., State Police Ret. Sys., 194 N.J. 29, 45 (2008) (quoting State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 (1956)).

Regional Recycling v. Dep

256 N.J. Super. 94 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1991

Super. 94 (1991) 606 A.2d 817 REGIONAL RECYCLING, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … Ringlieb v. Tp. of Parsippany Troy Hills, 59 N.J. 348, 350 , 283 A. 2d 97 (1971); see also So. Ocean Landfill v. Mayor & Coun. Tp. Of Ocean, 64 N.J. 190, 194 , 314 A. 2d 65 (1974).

Plushanski v. Union Tp.

176 N.J. Super. 626 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1980

The rollback tax was imposed by judgments of the Hunterdon County Board of Taxation, which judgments were contested by taxpayers. … Schere v. Tp. of Freehold, 150 N.J. Super. 404 (App.Div. 1977). The highest and best use of the property must be considered in valuing land under N.J.S.A. 54:4-23. Hackensack Water Co. v.

801 Avenue C, Inc. v. City of Bayonne

127 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 1974

Instead, it proposed to administer the ordinance through the procedure of board of adjustment variances and planning board site plan approval on a case by case basis. … Wilson v. Mountainside, supra, 42 N. J. at 443-447; Rockhill v. Chesterfield Tp., 23 N. J. 117 (1957); Davidow v. South Brunswick Tp. Bd. of Adj., 123 N. J. Super. 162, 166 (App. Div. 1973); Kozesnik v.