Case law

Jai Sai Ram, LLC and Sunil Dhir v. the planning/zoning

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 27, 2016

State v. D.A., 191 N.J. 158, 164 (2007) (citing DiProspero v. Penn, 183 N.J. 477, 492 (2005)). Ordinarily, "the best indicator of that intent is the plain language" of the statute. State v. … See Perrelli v. Pastorelle, 206 N.J. 193, 200-01 (2011); Marshall v. Klebanov, 188 N.J. 23, 36-37 (2006).

Strohmeyer v. Borough of Little Ferry

6 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 1950

In McFeely v. … Board of Pension Commissioners, 1 N.J. 212 (1948), it was held that the Board of Pension Commissioners of the City of Hoboken exercised a power that was judicial in nature and which comprehended the exercise of discretion

Trenkamp v. Township of Burlington

170 N.J. Super. 251 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 1979

See Schack v. Trimble, supra 28 N.J. at 46-50 . Alongi v. … It is doubtful that the Legislature intended boards of adjustment to exercise such discretion. Cf. Branagan v. Schettino, 100 N.J. Super. 580, 589 (App.Div. 1968).

State Ex Rel. Tm

412 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 2010

Brown, 80 N.J. 587 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979) (evidence sufficient for defendant's conviction for possession of heroin in bedroom closet despite no mention of fingerprint evidence); State v. … State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 604 , 573 A. 2d 886 (1990). See also State v. Cleveland, 371 N.J.Super. 286, 295 , 852 A. 2d 1150 (App. Div.)

Trailways, Inc. v. City of Atlantic City

179 N.J. Super. 258 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1980

In Judson v. … Dist. v.

J. J. Nugent Co. v. Sagner

141 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1976

Thus, the personal injury action against the boards of education would properly be venued in Ocean County and the death action against the boards of education in Dnion County. … The boards of education sought a change of venue from Dnion to Ocean County.

TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD, ETC. VS. DEPTFORD COMMONS, LLC DEPTFORD COMMONS, LLC VS. TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (C-000019-19 and L-0410-20, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 2021

Burns argued the cause for respondent Township of Deptford Zoning Board of Adjustment (Dembo, Brown & Burns, LLP, attorneys; James W. Burns, of counsel and on the brief). … See State v.

Schoharie County Coop. Dairies v. Eisenstein

22 N.J. Super. 503 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 7, 1952

Williams v. De Fabio, 3 N.J. Super. 182 ( App. Div. 1949); Byard v. Holmes, 34 N.J.L. 296 ( Sup. Ct. 1870); Restatement of the Law of Torts, sec. 525. … Zelman v. Kaufherr, 76 N.J. Eq. 52 ( Ch. 1909); Hope v. Linden Park Blood Horse Association, 58 N.J.L. 627 ( E. & A. 1896); Brooks v. Cooper, 50 N.J. Eq. 761 ( E. & A. 1893); Parker v. Hayes, 39 N.J.

Baltuskonis v. City of Wildwood

440 N.J. Super. 600 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 2015

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Wildwood adopted Ordinance No. 1008-14 on July 9, 2014 by a unanimous vote of the Board of Commissioners (“Board”). … This distinction became the central focus of the Appellate Division in Roseff v.

Goddard v. Kelly

27 N.J. Super. 517 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1953

MELVIN GODDARD AND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GORDON C. KELLY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 13, 1953. … The question here involves an application of N.J.S.A. 19:16-4 which provides that no ballot which shall have any mark or erasure whatsoever shall be declared void unless the board, judge or officer conducting the recount

Goddard v. COUNTY BD. OF ELECTIONS, MONMOUTH CTY.

27 N.J. Super. 30 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1953

MELVIN GODDARD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH AND GORDON C. KELLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued July 27, 1953. … We should not, without some good ground in the statutes, impress upon such determinations of such boards the attributes of a common-law judgment. Cf. Central Home Trust Co. v. Gough, 5 N.J. Super. 295 ( App. Div. 1949).

Garry v. Payne

224 N.J. Super. 729 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 10, 1988

V. … See also Brothers v. Highlands, 178 N.J. Super. 146 (App.Div. 1981) and Danow v. Penn Central Transp. Co., 153 N.J. Super. 597 (Law Div. 1977). We are aware of the speculation of the trial judge in Bosch v.

State of New Jersey v. L.D.

444 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 2016

[State v. Morrison, 188 N.J. 2, 13 (2006)] (citing State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454, 459 (1967)). … McCann v. Clerk of Jersey City, 167 N.J. 311, 320 (2001) (quoting SASCO 1997 NJ, LLC v.

Frieman v. Randolph Tp.

216 N.J. Super. 507 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 6, 1987

Super. 507 (1987) 524 A.2d 453 FRIEMAN, JACK, C/O DONALD LEGOW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH (MORRIS COUNTY), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. WADLE & LOMAKIN ASSOC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. … Co. v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 (1954). Baldwin is factually distinguishable.

State v. Gargiulo

103 N.J. Super. 140 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1968

Ranney v. Istituto Pontificio Delle Maestre Filippini, 20 N.J. 189, 197 (1955); Hay v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ft. Lee, 37 N.J. Super. 461, 464 ( App. Div. 1955); Weber v. Pieretti, 72 N.J. … See Ackerman Fuel Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Paramus, 136 N.J.L. 93, 95 ( Sup. *148 Ct. 1947). As noted, he was subsequently allowed additional signs.

Central Towers Co. v. Borough of Fort Lee

173 N.J. Super. 458 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1980

Bowers v. American Bridge Co.

43 N.J. Super. 48 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1956

Gotkin v. Weinberg, 2 N.J. 305 (1949). … New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Popovich, 18 N.J. 218, 225 (1955). In Cline v.

State ex rel. W. E. C.

165 N.J. Super. 161 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1979

A. 2A:170-29(1) under the constitutional criteria recognized by the Supreme Court in State v. Rosenfeld, 62 N. J. 594, 603-604 (1973). We do not agree. Under Rosenfeld and State v. Brown, 62 N. … The language used by appellant and the circumstances of its use in direct reference to the police officers met the test just recited, and State v. Brown, supra, is directly in point.

Paradise Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Riverdale Mgmt. Associates

404 N.J. Super. 309 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 2008

Richardson v. Bd. of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret. Sys., 192 N.J. 189, 195 , 927 A. 2d 543 (2007); Patel v. N.J. … Bollerman testified before the Planning Board urging a similar outcome.

Mutschler v. DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION

337 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 2001

Pascucci v. … Courts extend substantial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations, DiMaria v. Board of Trs. of Publ. Employees' Ret.