Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.71s
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 2020
The allegations of abuse and neglect were not established, and the Division closed the case on April 9, 2017. … Clearly, the facts of this case do not warrant reversal of the judge's decision on the same grounds as K.A. A.H. also challenges the judge's finding as to Zayonara.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SAYVON LAWS (13-01-0182 AND 13-04-0640, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 2017
Accordingly, the reviewing court has a responsibility to "canvass the record, inclusive of the expert testimony, to determine whether the findings made by the trial judge were clearly erroneous." Ibid. … Our statutes do not define "predicate offense"; instead, courts use this term to refer to the crimes that qualify as sexually violent offenses under N.J.S.A. 30:4-27.26(a) or (b).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. C.E.L. (11-03-0672, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2021
During the rapport stage, the interviewer tries to make the child comfortable and establish communication. … N.J.R.E. 517 codify the victim-counselor privilege, such that "it is the public policy of this State to extend a testimonial privilege encompassing the contents of communications with a victim counselor and to render immune
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMICHAEL MCCARTHY VS. PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH (L-0041-11, CAPE MAY COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 14, 2018
A-4442-15T4 14 Of course, a plaintiff failing to prove reasonable reliance on the misrepresentation, has failed to establish liability. … provided "by or on behalf of the seller," which the information Woodward sought out from the Township clearly was not.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2017
A.D., 212 N.J. 200, 231 (2012), nor are they immune from common causes of frustration. Having reviewed the entirety of the record, we discern no basis which portrays judicial bias. … Hightower, 120 N.J. 378, 410 (1990), that is an error which was "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Fernando Carrero, Jr.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 24, 2025
Whether this evidence does, in fact, establish defendant's motive for killing . . . Hall is for you to decide. … Importantly, "a defendant's federal and state confrontation rights are satisfied so long as the testifying witness is qualified to perform, and did in fact perform, an independent review of testing data and processes,
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Khalil Wheelerweaver
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 2024
Cofield, the Court established a multi-factor test to determine when and in what circumstances "other crimes" evidence is admissible in a criminal trial. 127 N.J. 328, 338 (1992). … The record clearly shows the detectives did not 'interrogate' defendant by informing him he was going to be charged with murder.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Kurt v. Smith
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 2023
Defendant argues Detective Lloyd's testimony established the petcock valve was loose and potentially leaking gas. … However, the jury clearly credited the State's evidence. Defendant received a fair trial. II.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Michael Ramirez
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 2024
At that point, Vaquero was clearly aware the police were conducting some sort of investigation. … However, defense counsel asserted Tang was not qualified to offer testimony about how the drugs might affect a person or, specifically, Sara.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARLOS I. MENJIVAR (15-05-0762, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 7, 2022
The proponent of the technique has the burden to "clearly establish" general acceptance and may do so using "(1) A-3742 … In addition, while the verdict sheet itself did not mention manslaughter, the instructions clearly did.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DASHON T. ROSS (16-06-1805 AND 16-06-1808, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 21, 2021
Both troopers testified that during this encounter, they were standing approximately one to two feet away while facing the man and thus could clearly see his face. … Furthermore, although defendant was clearly in custody, his inculpatory utterance was not in response to police questioning.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 2019
The trial court clearly considered more than the near-drowning event in its analysis of the mother. … The second statutory prong as to the mother was also clearly established by the trial proofs.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished427 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 2012
If a state trial judge is important enough, a General Assembly member is clearly important enough. Thus, the District Court’s first “crucial distinction” is untenable. … These provisions are all designed to ensure that the voters can exercise their votes in a knowledgeable and meaningful way to elect qualified candidates.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JASON MAYS (17-01-0032, HUNTERDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 2021
To qualify for this position, defendant was required to pass a civil service test, undergo a background check, and meet certain physical fitness requirements. … He contends that motive would have been established by proof he committed the alleged conduct.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 2021
Kairys was qualified as an expert without objection. … Clearly, defendant's assertion that defense counsel was ineffective for failing "to highlight to the court that the State failed to prove where the pill came from or even what the pill was" is belied by the record.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJ.D. v. S.F. (FM-13-1808-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2022
court's 'award A-1841-20 16 will not be disturbed unless it is manifestly unreasonable, arbitrary, or clearly … A parties' settlement agreement or subsequent consent order may reasonably limit the circumstances that may qualify as "changed" by including an anti-Lepis clause. Quinn v. Quinn, 225 N.J. 34, 49-50 (2016).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 2018
The Perskie defendants argued negligent referral is not recognized as a cause of action in New Jersey and plaintiff failed to establish any facts during the course of discovery that would support a claim for liability … The New York attorney allegedly told his clients the New Jersey attorney was a "good well-qualified lawyer" who "was going to handle the case." Id. at 1166-67.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 1, 2017
That was clearly my understanding. … When defendant first mentioned the polygraph to O'Neill and Roman, the detectives did not know if there was a qualified officer available to administer one.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. A.O.F. (15-04-0224, WARREN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 2020
"[T]o qualify as fresh complaint, the victim's statements to someone she would ordinarily turn to for support must have been made within a reasonable time after the alleged assault and must have been spontaneous and voluntary … The record clearly established that defendant remained in his apartment until his arrest. Beth moved out in 2012, to live with J.W.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. P.Z. (FO-03-0090-19, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 22, 2020
The record establishes that defendant knowingly possessed an illegal firearm. … Crespo, 201 N.J. 207, 210 (2010) (holding PDVA constitutional because "the right to possess firearms clearly may be subject to reasonable limitations"); In re Winston, 438 N.J.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna