Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
1.83s
HAUL ROAD HOLDINGS, INC. VS. TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE (L-1866-13, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 13, 2018
Thus, the judge found that plaintiffs "failed to establish a breach of contract by a preponderance of the evidence submitted." … [t]here were clearly some discrepancies when you compared the bills to the [T]ownship reports. . . . But . . . I . . . focused on what was the total bill[.]
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 8, 2017
At trial, the evidence presented by the State consisted of the testimony of Plainfield Police Officers Ronald James, William Guy, Jesse McNeil, and Sergeant Ronald Fusco, as well as Lieutenant Michael Sanford who was qualified … In addition, J.H. contends that his sentence "was unduly excessive" and "[t]he court clearly erred in only finding one mitigating factor[.]"
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 2021
Consequently, the sale to appellant did not have to qualify as a comparable sale. … We therefore review for plain error that is "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2. We find no such plain error.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEil Investments, Lp v. Steven E. Angstreich
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 11, 2024
Clearly, "[t]he good cause standard is 'more lenient' and '"flexible . . ." without a fixed or definite meaning.'" Hollywood Café, 473 N.J. Super. at 217 (quoting Bldg. Materials Corp. of Am., 424 N.J. … Applying those principles, the Gonzalez Court held that the plaintiff's refusal "to take the oath and provide testimony" in violation of the trial court's order, despite being "uniquely qualified to provide testimony concerning
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Jose Y. Martinez-Mejia
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 2023
A-3472-21 18 The McLean Court found the second part of the officer's testimony inadmissible because the police officer had not been qualified as an expert and because the lay … It was evidence to be weighed by the jury under a preponderance standard if and only if they found guilt had been established. C.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 20, 2017
This clearly demonstrates past and prospective harm. … His opinions reliably established that [K.M.K.] will not suffer any long or enduring harm if the parental rights of defendant are terminated, because there is no bond, connection
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 15, 2017
Thus, corroboration may also be established by evidence of emotional impacts, such as nightmares and other psychological conditions. Ibid. … [t]he perpetrator's failure to comply with court orders or clearly established or agreed-upon 27 A-1961-14T2 conditions designed to ensure the child's
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. S.D. (14-04-0258, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 2021
Gladibel Medina, who was qualified as an expert in child abuse pediatrics. Dr. Medina testified that she met with S.B. and her mother for "diagnosis and treatment." S.B. told Dr. … Defendant failed to A-3282-16T4 27 establish that his incarceration would entail "excessive" hardship to
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 2019
The trial court's interpretation of the law and "the consequences that flow from established facts are not entitled to any special deference." Gamble, 218 N.J. at 425. … Additionally, when there is no objection (like here), we usually disregard an error not raised unless we find plain error—that is, error that is "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRichard T. Ross v. Valerie M. Ross
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2025
Ross, challenges two orders of the Family Part: (1) a February 24, 2023 order denying as untimely her motion to vacate a prior order compelling her to execute the Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) prepared by … She continued her efforts to obtain a calculation from Troyan, with Davidse's assistance, to establish that Fried's conclusions were erroneous.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJANET YIJUAN FOU VS. KEVIN KERVENG TUNG, PC (L-6259-12, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 25, 2021
Plaintiff's Medicaid benefits terminated in late 2011, when she turned sixty-five and qualified for Medicare. … "An appellate court will not reverse a trial court's determination of a motion for a new trial 'unless it clearly appears that there was a miscarriage of justice under the law.'" Delvecchio v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJAMILA M. PERRY VS. LONGINA PEREZ (L-5151-13, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 2018
Gupta was qualified without objection as an expert in the field of biomechanics.1 In a written report prepared prior to trial, Dr. Gupta opined that 1 As our Supreme Court noted in Hisenaj v. … Clearly, the officer was merely relating what each party told him happened that day and, notably, neither party disagreed as to how the accident occurred.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. R.J.M. (11-08-0763, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 2018
The balance of these factors establish that defendant was not subjected to substantial psychological pressure during interrogation. See Cook, 179 N.J. at 563. … N.J.R.E. 803(c)(27). 24 A-0359-15T3 Defendant also argues the testimony of the child abuse pediatrician, who was also qualified
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 2017
These words alone might qualify, in the language of the statute, as "indicating that the signer is acting as surety or guarantor with respect to the obligation of another party to the instrument." Ibid. … We do not exclude the possibility that at trial, JPMorgan could establish grounds for waiver, but the summary judgment record was wholly insufficient to warrant a conclusion to the contrary.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 8, 2019
On appeal, the father argues: POINT I THE JUDGE CLEARLY ERRED IN FAILING TO ADMIT THE FOSTER FATHER'S RACIST AND VIOLENT FACEBOOK POSTS INTO EVIDENCE. … POINT II THE JUDGE CLEARLY ERRED IN ADMITTING DR. LEE'S TESTIMONY BASED ON THE RORSCHACH TEST.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEvolution Construction, LLC v. Finomus Orange Re Holdings, LLC
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2025
These written daily job reports clearly satisfy Article 9.2's requirement that plaintiff submit "a written notice of the cause of the delay with[in] ten . . . days." … Specifically, neither the delays associated with PSE&G nor Orange's protracted delay in issuing the building permit qualify as "acts (including [c]hanges) or omission[s]" of Finomus Orange, nor do those delays fall within
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 3, 2020
of intoxication required by the [c]ourt to qualify as a defense as well as to create a jury question on defendant's intoxication." … The court clearly placed its findings as to Yarbough factors on the record that warranted the imposition of consecutive terms.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. S.A.B. (17-02-0140, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 2021
Barbara Wolf, who was qualified as an expert in the field of forensic pathology. Dr. Wolf testified about the photos that B.H. took of her back. … The erroneous admission of those comments was not "clearly capable of producing an unjust result." R. 2:10-2. V. Defendant also contends he should be resentenced.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DWAYNE D. BOSTON (15-09-2753, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 16, 2021
" only "a State I.D.," the officer can be heard to state clearly, "Okay, let me see that." … But establishing the legality of the stop is not the end of the inquiry here.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOHN DEROSA (10-06-1170, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 2019
Defendant urges us, as a matter of State constitutional interpretation, to dispense with the requirement, established in Arizona v. … Under the familiar two-prong standard established in Strickland v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna