Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Griffith v. Rittenhouse Park Community Ass'n

    215 N.J. Super. 444 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1986

    The rule is set forth in Summer Cottagers’ Assoc. of Cape May v. … Article V, § 3 of the declaration, also incorporated in the bylaws, provides: The Board of Trustees of the Association may, after consideration of current maintenance costs and future needs of the Association, fix the actual

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Walker v. NJ Dept. of Inst. & Agencies

    147 N.J. Super. 485 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1977

    Super. 485 (1977) 371 A.2d 739 LENA WALKER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND THE PASSAIC COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … S & L Associates, Inc. v. Washington Tp., 35 N.J. 224 (1961); Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson, 95 N.J. Super. 495, 516 (App. Div. 1967), certif. den. 50 N.J. 300 (1967).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pitaresi v. Appello

    17 N.J. Super. 278 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1952

    Although there is no opinion on file with the Tenement House Board that the halls and stairs are not sufficiently lighted so that lights should have been kept burning during daylight hours, an inspector of the Board will … Evers v. Davis, supra .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Monarch Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Genser

    156 N.J. Super. 107 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1977

    Sas v. Strelecki, 110 N. J. Super. 14, 20 (App. Div. 1970); Brown v. Mortimer, supra 100 N. J. Super, at 403. The court in Mahoney v. Minsky, 39 N. … [at 218] Accord, Brown v. Mortimer, supra 100 N. J. Super. at 403; Falcone v. N. J. Bell Tel. Co., 98 N. J. Super. 138, 147 (App. Div. 1967); Carroll v. Houtz, 93 N. J. Super. 215, 219-220 (App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ivy Hill Park Apartments v. Sidisin

    258 N.J. Super. 19 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1992

    Tax decreases are to be passed on to the tenant, but control board approval is not required. … See Chau v. Cardillo, 250 N.J.Super. 378, 384 , 594 A. 2d 1334 (App.Div.1991); Housing Auth. of Passaic v. Torres, 143 N.J.Super. 231, 236 , 362 A.2d 1254 (App.Div.1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Bell

    388 N.J. Super. 629 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 2006

    See Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 , 60 L.Ed. 2d 824 (1979); Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed. 2d 416 (1975); State v. Chippero, 164 N.J. 342 , 753 A. 2d 701 (2000); State v. … See also Brown, supra, 422 U.S. at 591-92 , 95 S.Ct. at 2256 , 45 L.Ed. 2d at 420 . In New York v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Schwartz v. Dover Public Schools

    180 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1981

    We affirm essentially for the reasons given by the State Board of Education. Reason is said to be the “soul of law,” and the sense of a statute should control over its literal terms. State v. … State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 (1966); Marranca v. Harbo, 41 N.J. 569, 574 (1964).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Frech Funeral Home

    185 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 1982

    See, State v. Mraovitch, 176 N.J. Super. 141, 145 (App.Div. 1980); State v. Kent, 173 N.J. Super. 215, 221 (App.Div. 1980); State v. Glass, 171 N.J. Super. 157, 159-160 (Law Div. 1979). … Incorporation by morticians was held permissible in Trinka Services v. Mortuary Science Board, 40 N.J. Super. 238 (Law Div. *395 1956).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, ETC. VS. CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC (L-2044-17, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 2021

    Co. v. Land, 186 N.J. 163, 175-76 (2006). … Brewer v. Porch, 53 N.J. 167, 174 (1969); see also Lozano v. Frank DeLuca Constr., 178 N.J. 513, 532 (2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montclair Tp. v. Hughey

    222 N.J. Super. 441 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 20, 1987

    OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 15, 1987. … Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 27 N.J. Super. 240, 242 (App.Div. 1953).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Drew Associates of N.J., L.P. v. Travisano

    235 N.J. Super. 194 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1989

    Greenberg v. Kimmelman, 99 N.J. 552, 562, 568 (1985). See also Katobimar Realty Co. v. Webster, 20 N.J. 114 (1955). … Greenberg, 99 N.J. at 562 ; Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees, 77 N.J. 55 (1978).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fair Lawn Retired Policemen v. Borough of Fair Lawn

    299 N.J. Super. 600 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1997

    In Gauer v. … Merin v. Maglaki, 126 N.J. 430, 435 , 599 A.2d 1256 (1992); see also Jacobitti v. Jacobitti, 135 N.J. 571, 579-80 , 641 A.2d 535 (1994); Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 , 626 A.2d 1073 (1993).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ramer v. NJ Transit Bus Operations, Inc.

    335 N.J. Super. 304 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 2000

    Chattin v. Cape May Greene, Inc., 243 N.J.Super. 590, 620 , 581 A. 2d 91 (App.Div.1990), aff'd o.b., 124 N.J. 520 , 591 A. 2d 943 (1991); Brown v. … ."); Ensslin v. Board of Trs., Police & Firemen's Ret.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cammarano v. Allendale

    65 N.J. Super. 240 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1961

    CAMMARANO, RECEIVER IN AID OF EXECUTION OF HOWARD BUILDERS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. BOROUGH OF ALLENDALE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. … The failure of the borough or its planning board to grant the subdivision, in my opinion, clearly entitles the plaintiff to the return of the deposit. Judgment accordingly.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • M. A. Stephen Construction Co. v. Borough of Rumson

    118 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1972

    Molloy v. City of New Rochelle, 198 N. Y. 402 , 92 N. E. 94, 96 (Ct. App. 1910); Lane v. Board of Com'rs of Boone County, 7 Ind. App. 625 , 35 N. E. 28 (App. … Somers Construction Co. v. Board of Education, 198 F. Supp. 782 (D. N. J. 1962) ; Malan Const. Corp. v. Board of County Road Com’rs, 187 F. Supp. 937 (E. D. Mich. 1960) ; Day v. City of Beatrice, 169 Neb. 858 , 101 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. REGINALD v. BROWN (12-05-0090, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 2019

    A-2556-17T4 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REGINALD V. BROWN, a/k/a REGINAL V. … State v. Brown, No. A-4320-12 (App. Div. Nov. 16, 2015) (slip op.).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Salem Management Co. v. Township of Lopatcong

    387 N.J. Super. 573 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 21, 2006

    Co. v. … See Matturri v. Board of Trustees, Judicial Retirement System, 173 N.J. 368, 381 , 802 A.2d 496 (2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Winbush v. Sills

    88 N.J. Super. 392 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 1965

    Super. 392 (1965) 212 A.2d 571 JAMES WINBUSH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … However, in light of Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Kaye

    212 N.J. Super. 703 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 13, 1986

    Ippolito v. Mayor of Hoboken, 60 N.J.Super. 477, 486 (App.Div.1960). *708 Loigman has already sued under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-18. Were it not for his action, the present budget application would likely not be before me. … See Mathesius v. Mercer *709 Cty. Improvement Auth., 177 N.J.Super. 626 (App.Div.1981), certif. den. 87 N.J. 425 (1981). For the foregoing reasons, Loigman’s motion to intervene is denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Veloso

    93 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1966

    He noted that, either by chance or desire, the association presently has no lawyers on the board. … See Kanengiser v. First Savings and Loan Association of Jersey City, 50 N. J. Super. 427 (App. Div. 1958).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.