Case law

Schwartz v. WORRALL PUBLICATIONS

258 N.J. Super. 493 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1992

In Anderson v. … Sys. of Tex., Inc. v.

South Orange Ave. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Commrs.

4 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1949

Paul v. Gloucester County, 50 N.J.L. 585 ( E. A. 1888). On the other hand, many provisions in our statutes point the other way. … The decisions of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners are affirmed. *Page 196

Bendix Corp. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX

237 N.J. Super. 328 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 19, 1989

ASARCO Inc. v. … Asarco's Board of Directors resisted and the matter was not pursued. V. BENDIX ACQUISITION HISTORY Bendix's Asarco acquisition was not an isolated event.

State v. Tri-Way Kars, Inc.

402 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 18, 2008

Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Twp. … V.

Pine Grove Manor v. Director, Div. of Taxation

68 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1961

Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 14 N.J. Misc. 308 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), affirmed 117 N.J.L. 530 ( E. & A. 1936); Fairmount Hospital, Inc., v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N.J.L. 8 ( Sup. … Princeton Country Day School v. State Board, etc., 113 N.J.L. 515, 517 , 175 A. 136 ; Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 102 N.J.L. 525 , 133 A. 886 ; affirmed 104 N.J.L. 165 , 138 A. 919 .

Casey v. Male

65 N.J. Super. 428 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 7, 1961

As support for their theories, the defendants, in the main, rely upon the cases of Barringer v. Miele, 6 N. J. 139 (1951); Eagle Truck Transport, Inc. v. Board of Review, 29 N. J. 280 (1959); and Ablondi v. … The defendant-intervenors submit that Ablondi v. Board of Review, supra, “is authority sustaining the position of the intervening defendants.”

Forsyth v. Township of Lacey

167 N.J. Super. 198 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1978

A. 54:4-23; Secaucus v. Damsil, Inc., 120 N. J. Super. 470 (App. Div. 1972), certif. den. 62 N. J. 90 (1972). … It appears that the appeal to the county board from the assessment for 1975 was dismissed without prejudice because of the then pending appeal to the Division from the 1974 county board determination.

Kuehne Chemical Co. v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission

300 N.J. Super. 433 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 9, 1997

North Jersey Newspapers Co. v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders, 127 N.J. 9, 16 , 601 A.2d 693 (1992). … Higg-A-Rella, Inc. v. County of Essex, supra, 141 N.J. at 46 , 660 A.2d 1163 ; North *440 Jersey Newspapers Co. v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders, supra, 127 N.J. at 13, 601 A.2d 693 .

Barnhart v. United Automobile, Etc., Local 669

12 N.J. Super. 147 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1951

Union or to a subordinate body * * *" the executive board is vested with authority to originate and try charges against members. … Gordon v. Tomei, supra .

Fleischer v. James Drug Stores, Inc.

7 N.J. Super. 529 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1950

In State v. Maas, 4 N. J. Misc. 230, Henry V. Walker at a special meeting of the board of directors of Maas & Waidstein Company, was removed from office by the board and Mr. Maas chosen to succeed him. … Walker v. Maas, supra, and Walker v.

Alsar Technology v. Zon. Bd. of Adj.

235 N.J. Super. 471 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1989

AND DAVID AGENS AND MILDRED AGENS, PLAINTIFFS, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, DEFENDANTS. … Lackey v. Bowling, 476 F. Supp. 1111 (D.Ill. 1979). Gregg v. Township Committee of the Township of Hazlet, 232 N.J. Super. 34, 38 (App.Div. 1989). Hutto v.

Dixon v. Rutgers

215 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1987

See Namenwirth v. Board of Regents, 769 F. 2d 1235, 1241 (7 Cir.1985), cert. den. ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 807 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 782 (1986). … See Gray v. Board of Higher Educ., 692 F. 2d 901, 908 (2 Cir.1982).

TWO DAUGHTERS, LLC VS. HARBOUR BAY, LLC (L-0990-18, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 7, 2020

Courts do not determine the wisdom of a planning board action. Kaufmann v. Planning Bd. for Warren, 110 N.J. 551, 558 (1988). … A party challenging a board's decision must establish that the board's action was arbitrary, unreasonable, or capricious. Price v. Himeji, LLC, 214 N.J. 263, 284 (2013).

Schick v. Grote

42 N.J. Eq. 352 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1886

In Dilts v. Stevenson, 2 C. E. … Brabrook v. Savings Bank, 104 Mass. 228 ; Brown v. Brown, 23 Barb. 565 ; Marshal v. Crutwell, L. R. (20 Eq.) 328; Smith v. Speer, 7 Stew. Eq. 336.

In re Kriso

276 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 14, 1994

Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1 , 626 A.2d 1073 (1993) (quoting Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 440 , 91 A.2d 865 (1952)). … For example, in Friends of Usry for Mayor Campaign v.

Shuster v. Bd. of Education of Hardwick Tp.

8 N.J. Super. 415 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 1950

Super. 415 (1950) 72 A.2d 910 AUSTIN SHUSTER, PLAINTIFF, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HARDWICK IN THE COUNTY OF WARREN IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT. … Miller v. Reich, 134 N.J. Eq. 28 , 34 A. 2d 143 . In the instant matter this jurisdictional prerequisite *418 is absent; in fact, the object of the suit is to recover possession of the lands.

Ochsner v. Township of Cranbury

8 N.J. Tax 330 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1986

The denial of the application to extend the preliminary subdivision approval and the validity of the amended zoning ordinance were both challenged in an action entitled Ochsner v. Cranbury Tp. … Land, Improvement Co. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp., 40 N.J. 539 , 193 A.2d 232 (1963). However, the trial court properly noted that the value of land is a factual question.

State ex rel. J.B.

293 N.J. Super. 485 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 23, 1996

Accord, Doe v. State, 165 N.J.Super. 392, 400 , 398 A.2d 562 (App.Div.1979). … See, e.g., Pascucci v. Vagott, 71 N.J. 40 , 362 A.2d 566 (1976); Bishop v. N.J. Sports & Exposition Authority, 168 N.J.Super. 533 , 403 A.2d 934 (App.Div.1979).

State, Dept. of Health v. Tegnazian

194 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1984

Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N.J. 589, 599 (1965). See, also, Mayflower Securities v. … Stewart v. Sec. of Health, Educ. & Welfare of U.S., 714 F. 2d 287, 290 (3rd Cir.1983), quoting Cotter v. Harris, 642 F. 2d 700, 705 (3rd Cir.1981).

MAIN STREET AT WOOLWICH, LLC VS. AMMONS SUPERMARKET, INC.(L-1477-14, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

451 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 25, 2017

In 2010, the Woolwich Township Joint Land Use Board (Board) approved the GDP permitting Main Street, Commons, and Crossings to be developed in three phases. … We rejected Ammons' claim that the Board did not have authority to consider the original GDP or its amendments, and found several of Ammons' arguments to be without sufficient merit to warrant discussion. Pagano v.