Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.70s

  • Schwartz v. WORRALL PUBLICATIONS

    258 N.J. Super. 493 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1992

    In Anderson v. … Sys. of Tex., Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Celmer

    143 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 1976

    Percello v. … of Education v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Grodjesk v. Jersey City Medical Center

    135 N.J. Super. 393 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1975

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). * * *" Dr. … See Jacobs v. Martin, supra, 20 N.J. Super. at 538 ; Don v. Okmulgee Memorial Hospital, 443 F. 2d 234, 238 (10 Cir.1971); Sosa v. Board of Managers, 437 F. 2d 173, 175 (5 Cir.1971); Meredith v. Allen Cty.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Clover Cable Systems, Inc.

    199 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1985

    Thus, the Board could not issue a certificate of approval to Clover pursuant to subsection 17b. Clear TV Cable Corp. v. Public Utility Commr’s., supra ( 85 N.J. at 47 ). … Paterson Publishing Co. v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 21 N.J. 460, 467-468 (1956); In re Micro-Cable Communications Corp., supra ( 176 N.J.Super. at 205 ). Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Long Branch v. Monmouth Medical Center

    138 N.J. Super. 524 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1976

    The Monmouth County Board of Taxation (county board) reduced the assessment on the land to $7,000 and on the building to $160,000. … The county board reduced the assessment to $540,700.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Mountain Lakes v. Mola

    60 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1960

    Super. 419 (1960) 159 A.2d 468 BOROUGH OF MOUNTAIN LAKES, PLAINTIFF, v. HENRY J. MOLA, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County Court, Law Division. Decided March 18, 1960. *420 Messrs. … Zahon v. Newark Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. Super. 516, 522 ( App. Div. 1957).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Woodbury Trust Company

    2 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1949

    Skellenger's Ex'rs. v. Skellenger's Ex'rs., 32 N.J. Eq. 659 , 662 ; Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 126 N.J. Eq. 406 , 417 ; 9 Atl. (2d) 311 . … See also Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., supra; Skellenger's Ex'rs. v. Skellenger's Ex'rs., supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pine Grove Manor v. Director, Div. of Taxation

    68 N.J. Super. 135 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1961

    Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 14 N.J. Misc. 308 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), affirmed 117 N.J.L. 530 ( E. & A. 1936); Fairmount Hospital, Inc., v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N.J.L. 8 ( Sup. … Princeton Country Day School v. State Board, etc., 113 N.J.L. 515, 517 , 175 A. 136 ; Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 102 N.J.L. 525 , 133 A. 886 ; affirmed 104 N.J.L. 165 , 138 A. 919 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Playboy-Elsinore Associates

    203 N.J. Super. 470 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 6, 1985

    See Knight v. Margate, 86 N.J. 374 (1981); Bally Mfg. Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm’n., 85 N.J. 325 app. dism. 454 U.S. 804 , 102 S.Ct. 77 , 70 L.Ed.2d 74 (1981). … Since the condition is imposed on the entire industry according to some yet unspoken standard and meets, generally, the test of Metromedia, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Lee

    258 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1992

    Pastore v. Essex Cty., 237 N.J. Super. 371, 377 , 568 A. 2d 81 (App.Div. 1989); N.J. Turnpike Employees v. N.J. Turnpike Auth., 200 N.J. … See e.g., State v. Pitman, 201 N.J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Redeb Amusement, Inc. v. Tp. of Hillside

    191 N.J. Super. 84 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1983

    In Durgin v. Brown, 37 N.J. 189 (1962) our Supreme Court recognized that "The requirement for the exhaustion of the administrative remedy is neither jurisdictional nor absolute in its terms." Id. at 202-203 . … Thus, the Board of Public Utility Commissioners has been guided by simple standards of "public convenience of necessity." R.S. 48:2-21. See Fornarotto v. Bd. of Public Util. Comm., 105 N.J.L. 28, 32 (Sup.Ct. 1928).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • County Bank and Trust Co. v. Neeld

    32 N.J. Super. 124 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 21, 1954

    Sisters of Charity v. Cory, 73 N.J.L. 699 ( E. & A. 1907); Carteret Academy v. State Board, etc., 102 N.J.L. 525 ( Sup. Ct. 1926), affirmed 104 N.J.L. 165 ( E. & A. 1927); City of Trenton v. … State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N.J.L. 105 ( Sup. Ct. 1941), affirmed sub nom. City of Trenton v. Rider College, 128 N.J.L. 320 ( E. & A. 1942); College of Paterson v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 131 N.J.L. 57 ( Sup.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hornauer v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control

    40 N.J. Super. 501 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1956

    Passarella v. Board of Commissioners, 1 N.J. Super. 313, 321 ( App. Div. 1949); Traymore of Atlantic City, Inc., v. Hock, 9 N.J. Super. 47, 48 ( App. Div. 1950); In re Schneider, 12 N.J. Super. 449, 454 ( App. … Board of Commissioners of City of Trenton, 35 N.J. Super. 30, 34 ( App. Div. 1955); cf. New Jersey Bell Tel. Co. v. Communications Workers, etc., 5 N.J. 354, 378 (1950).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • City of Elizabeth v. Windsor-Fifth Avenue

    31 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1954

    Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of W. New York, 133 N.J.L. 220, 226 ( Sup. Ct. 1945); Elliott v. State, 29 Ariz. 389 , 242 P. 340 , 46 A.L.R. 290 ; City of Mt. Vernon v. … Amodio v. Board of Commissioners of W. New York, 133 N.J.L. 220 ( Sup. Ct. 1945), supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Rutgers

    215 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1987

    See Namenwirth v. Board of Regents, 769 F. 2d 1235, 1241 (7 Cir.1985), cert. den. ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 807 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 782 (1986). … See Gray v. Board of Higher Educ., 692 F. 2d 901, 908 (2 Cir.1982).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Eatontown Borough

    366 N.J. Super. 626 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 2004

    On March 29, 2001, the State filed simultaneous appeals with the Ocean and Monmouth County Boards of Taxation challenging the assessments. In June 2001, both Boards denied the State's appeals. … On March 29, 2001, the State filed a notice of appeal with the Ocean County Tax Board.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Coor v. Coor

    124 N.J. Super. 341 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1973

    Riker, Danzig, Scherer & Brown, attorneys.) Mr. William L. Boyan appeared for defendant-appellant and cross-repondent and filed a statement in lieu of brief. PER CURIAM. … See Duke v. Duke, 72 N.J. Eq. 515 (Ch. 1906), aff'd o.b. 72 N.J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Foster Wheeler Passaic v. PASSAIC CTY.

    266 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1993

    Karl's Sales and Serv., Inc. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 249 N.J. … Against Toxic Waste v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 230 N.J. Super. 133, 139 , 553 A. 2d 30 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 117 N.J. 64 , 563 A. 2d 828 (1989).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Platinum Management v. Dahms

    285 N.J. Super. 274 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 1995

    Brown of the Ohio Bar ( Eric L. Brown Co., attorneys) and Richard E. Kummer ( Kummer, Knox & Naughton, attorneys), for defendants. KOLE, J.A.D., Retired and Temporarily Assigned on Recall. … See United Board, supra, 63 N.J.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State v. Bradley

    174 N.J. Super. 154 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 1980

    Birdsall, the board’s engineer and a licensed professional land surveyor and planner. … The trial judge found that Bradley was not trying to advise the board, but rather was trying to persuade and “to sell a bill of goods” to the planning board, using personal puffery to promote his plan.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.