Case law

South Orange Ave. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Commrs.

4 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1949

Paul v. Gloucester County, 50 N.J.L. 585 ( E. A. 1888). On the other hand, many provisions in our statutes point the other way. … The decisions of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners are affirmed. *Page 196

Public Service Coordinated Transport v. State

26 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1953

Public Service Interstate Transportation Company v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 127 N. J. L. 29 (Sup. Ct. 1941). … Power & Light Co. v. Borough of Butler, 4 N. J. Super. 210 (App. Div. 1949). The six orders of the Board of Utility Commissioners approving the transfer of the several municipal consents are affirmed.

ESSEX CTY. BD. OF TAXATION v. Town of Belleville

95 N.J. Super. 327 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1967

Super. 327 (1967) 231 A.2d 223 ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF BELLEVILLE IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … the defendant tax assessor to "render all aid and assistance and perform such duties as may be necessary and appropriate to the timely completion of the ordered revaluation subject to the supervision of the Essex County Board

Christine Sullivan v. Dr. Asit Shah, M.D. ph.D.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 2025

Vitti v. Brown, 359 N.J. Super. 40, 45 (Law Div. 2003). … See Bender v.

CENTRAL TOWERS COMPANY v. Borough of Fort Lee

160 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 14, 1978

BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF FORT LEE, DEFENDANTS. JOHN F. INGANAMORT, MICHAEL INGANAMORT AND LASALA CONTRACTING CO., INC., A JOINT VENTURE TRADING AS MEDITERRANEAN TOWERS, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Freygang v. Verona, supra.

Salem Management Co. v. Township of Lopatcong

387 N.J. Super. 573 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 21, 2006

Co. v. … See Matturri v. Board of Trustees, Judicial Retirement System, 173 N.J. 368, 381 , 802 A.2d 496 (2002).

Nj Bldrs Ass'n v. Mayor and Township Committee of Bernards Tp.

211 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1985

In Divan Builders v. … Mayor of Englewood, 51 N.J. 108 (1968) (one year reservation of land for public parks and playground was a taking which required compensation); Battagalia v. Wayne Township Planning Board, 98 N.J.

Monarch Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Genser

156 N.J. Super. 107 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1977

Sas v. Strelecki, 110 N. J. Super. 14, 20 (App. Div. 1970); Brown v. Mortimer, supra 100 N. J. Super, at 403. The court in Mahoney v. Minsky, 39 N. … [at 218] Accord, Brown v. Mortimer, supra 100 N. J. Super. at 403; Falcone v. N. J. Bell Tel. Co., 98 N. J. Super. 138, 147 (App. Div. 1967); Carroll v. Houtz, 93 N. J. Super. 215, 219-220 (App.

Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. TP. OF PISCATAWAY

139 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1976

Van Realty, Inc. v. Passaic, 117 N.J. Super. 425 (App. Div. 1971); Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Newark, 133 N.J. Super. 427 (App. Div. 1975). … A similar claim was directly rejected in the recent case of Tri-Terminal Corp. v.

Mount v. Van Ness

34 N.J. Eq. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1881

Townsend v. Townsend, 2 Paige 413 ; Barclay v. Brown, 7 Paige 245 ; Caldwell v. Mayor &c. of Albany, 9 Paige 572 ; Bank of Monroe v. Widner, 11 Paige 529 ; Weed v. Lyon, Walk. Ch. 77. … In Young v. Young, 5 Stew.

Lynch v. United Fruit Co.

4 N.J. Super. 404 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 12, 1949

loose, defective, worn, old, rotted and unsafe planks or boards in the hatch cover. "(4) By covering the hatch with tarpaulin without first properly placing the planks or boards of the hatch cover over the hatch. "(5) In … in the hatch cover. "(3) By maintaining loose, defective, worn, old, rotted and unsafe planks or boards in the hatch cover. "(4) By covering the hatch with tarpaulin without first properly placing the planks or boards of

Maul v. Kirkman

270 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1994

The business judgment rule protects a board of directors from being questioned or second-guessed on conduct of corporate affairs except in instances of fraud, self-dealing, or unconscionable conduct. See Daloisio v. … Constantin & Co. v. R.P. Holding Corp., 56 N.J. Super. 411, 423 , 153 A. 2d 378 (Ch.Div. 1959) (dividend declaration is within discretion of board of directors). There is no dispute BSC is a personal holding company.

Appell v. Reiner

86 N.J. Super. 515 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 1965

APPELL, PLAINTIFF, v. ROBERT J. REINER AND ELSIE REINER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division. Decided February 18, 1965. *516 Messrs. Joyce & Brown, attorneys for plaintiff ( Mr. … Appell v.

Lakewood Tp. Mun. Util. v. S. Lakewood Water Co.

129 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1974

West Caldwell v. Caldwell, 26 N.J. 9, 26 (1958). In Castle Creek Water Co. v. … In Omaha v.

Ciluffo v. Middlesex General Hospital

146 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1977

Knutsen v. Brown, 96 N.J. Super. 229, 235 (App. Div. 1967). However, questions of liability may make plaintiff's recovery from either tortfeasor uncertain. … Knutsen v. Brown, supra , where a judgment was obtained against the original tortfeasors in a contested trial and was satisfied before the malpractice action was instituted.

DONELL L. PRINCE VS. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD (L-1679-17, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 12, 2021

PRINCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Bligen v. Jersey City Hous. Auth., 131 N.J. 124, 131 (1993); see also Rochinsky v.

Andreassen v. Esposito

90 N.J. Super. 170 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1966

. *171 Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN. Mr. Herbert E. Greenstone argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Greenstone & Greenstone, attorneys). Mr. Garret A. … Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of Camden, 6 N.J. 102, 107 (1950); Batts v. Joseph Newman, Inc., 3 N.J. 503, 510 (1950). As was said in 38 Am.

Miller v. Woodbury Trust Company

2 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 15, 1949

Skellenger's Ex'rs. v. Skellenger's Ex'rs., 32 N.J. Eq. 659 , 662 ; Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 126 N.J. Eq. 406 , 417 ; 9 Atl. (2d) 311 . … See also Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., supra; Skellenger's Ex'rs. v. Skellenger's Ex'rs., supra.

New Jersey Educ. Ass'n v. PERC

266 N.J. Super. 66 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1993

Super. 66 (1993) 628 A.2d 789 NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. … Such a reading, noted the Court, would violate the Supreme Court's proscription in Ellis v. Railway Clerks, 466 U.S. 435 , 104 S.Ct. 1883 , 80 L.Ed. 2d 428 (1984) and Abood v.

Feiler v. New Jersey Dental Ass'n

191 N.J. Super. 426 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 5, 1983

Deal Gardens, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Loch Arbour, 48 N.J. 492 (1967). The Legislature has furnished a remedy in the agency and it must be exhausted before judicial relief can be sought. … Unlike this case, they both involve the focal purposes of a professional licensing board. Even so, I am not sure they were correctly decided. Cf. Greenspan v. A.B.C.