Case law

State ex rel. T. E. T.

184 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1982

We find little difference between the standard of criminality established by State v. Green, supra, and State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56, 63-64 (1976), which followed the rule established in State v. … See State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 591 (1979). We find sufficient credible evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusion. State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 162 (1964); see State v. Brown, supra. Affirmed.

Farmer v. Meeker

63 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 1960

Ward v. Montgomery Tp., supra . … See Kozesnik v.

Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. TP. OF PISCATAWAY

139 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1976

Van Realty, Inc. v. Passaic, 117 N.J. Super. 425 (App. Div. 1971); Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Newark, 133 N.J. Super. 427 (App. Div. 1975). … A similar claim was directly rejected in the recent case of Tri-Terminal Corp. v.

In re Clover Cable Systems, Inc.

199 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1985

Thus, the Board could not issue a certificate of approval to Clover pursuant to subsection 17b. Clear TV Cable Corp. v. Public Utility Commr’s., supra ( 85 N.J. at 47 ). … Paterson Publishing Co. v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 21 N.J. 460, 467-468 (1956); In re Micro-Cable Communications Corp., supra ( 176 N.J.Super. at 205 ). Affirmed.

In Re Application of Corbo

54 N.J. Super. 575 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1959

Ct. 1953), certiorari denied 347 U.S. 907 , 74 S.Ct. 433 , 98 L.Ed. 1065 (1954), in language paralleling what our Supreme Court said in State v. Brown, supra : "There is but one crime called murder. … The primary reliance is upon State v. Brown, supra .

Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. v. Ocean Twp.

59 N.J. Super. 4 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1960

Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Ocean Twp., 56 N.J. Super. 310 ( Law Div. 1959). … We also pass the question as to whether the Board of Adjustment was a necessary party respondent on the appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Miskowitz v. Union County Utilities Authority

336 N.J. Super. 183 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 2001

Atlantic Coast Demolition v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 112 F.3d 652 , 669 (3d Cir.1997). Under the Third Circuit’s judgment, the stay was not to extend beyond the exhaustion of the State’s petition for certiorari. … Bd. of Educ. v. Old Bridge Educ. Ass’n, 98 N.J. 523, 531 , 489 A.2d 159 (1985); Carpenito v. Board of Educ., 322 N.J.Super. 522, 531 , 731 A.2d 538 (App.Div.1999).

Harvey v. ESSEX CO. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS

51 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1958

HARVEY, PLAINTIFF, v. THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF ESSEX COUNTY: EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ESSEX COUNTY; NEIL G. DUFFY, SHERIFF OF ESSEX COUNTY, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … The statute reads as follows: "The board of chosen freeholders in any county of this State having a population of more than eight hundred thousand inhabitants may retire any court attendant in the office of the sheriff, and

Bailey v. Driscoll

34 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 23, 1955

Shamberg v. Board of Riparian Commissioners, 72 N.J.L. 132, 135 ( Sup. Ct. 1905); Empire Trust Co. v. Board of Commerce and Navigation, 124 N.J.L. 406, 411 ( Sup. Ct. 1940). … Shamberg v. Board of Riparian Commissioners, supra; Harz v. Board of Commerce and Navigation, supra .

Foster Wheeler Passaic v. PASSAIC CTY.

266 N.J. Super. 429 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 1993

Karl's Sales and Serv., Inc. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 249 N.J. … Against Toxic Waste v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 230 N.J. Super. 133, 139 , 553 A. 2d 30 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 117 N.J. 64 , 563 A. 2d 828 (1989).

Moreira Constr. Co., Inc. v. Wayne Tp.

98 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1968

The decision of the Board of Referees shall be conclusive and binding upon both the Contractor and the Owner." … Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co., supra, 118 N.J. Eq., at p. 4 .

Botis v. Estate of Kudrick

421 N.J. Super. 107 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 2011

Serrano, supra, 304 N.J.Super. at 319 , 700 A. 2d 390 (quoting Nelson v. Board of Educ., 148 N.J. 358, 370 , 689 A. 2d 1342 (1997)). … Olkusz v. Brown, 401 N.J.Super. 496, 504 , 951 A. 2d 1069 (App.Div.2008).

Transport of New Jersey v. Matos

202 N.J. Super. 571 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1985

The powers of TNJ are vested in a seven-member governing board. … A board member may only be removed for cause by the Governor, N.J.S.A. 27:25-4(b) and the Governor has the power to veto any actions taken by the board. N.J.S.A. 27:25-4(f).

State v. Moore

101 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1968

When Moore continued with his reference to Robert's, the chairman again ruled him out of order, stating that Moore was not following the procedure set by the board for the hearing — the board was not using Robert's. … Although the facts in State v.

Newman v. Delahunty

293 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 15, 1994

See Lawrence v. Bauer Pub. & Print. … Delahunty and his in-laws had an application before the Board of Adjustment as well as the Planning Board regarding this property.

Ne v. Nj Div. of Med. Assistance

399 N.J. Super. 566 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 10, 2008

Super. 566 N.E., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE and Health Services and Somerset County Board of Social Services, Respondents-Respondents. Docket No. A-2276-06T2. … Cleary v. Waldman, 167 F. 3d 801, 806 (3d Cir.1999).

Elizabethtown Water Co. v. Bontempo

67 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1961

In the event that any of the conditions hereby imposed are violated and such violation shall be established to the satisfaction of this Board, this approval may thereby be abrogated upon the passage by this Board of a resolution … United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co., 352 U. S. 59, 66 , 77 S. Ct. 161 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 126 (1956); Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, 64 N. J. Super. 134 (App. Div. 1960), certification denied 34 N. J. 66 (1960).

Council of New Jersey State College Locals v. New Jersey State College Governing Boards Ass'n

226 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 20, 1988

This follows the recommendation of the Commission on the Future of the State Colleges as modified by the Board of Higher Education on October 26, 1984. [Emphasis added]. … Polillo v. Deane, 74 N.J. 562, 578-579 (1977). The judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is reversed. The matter is remanded for entry of judgment consistent with this opinion.

State v. Gonzalez

254 N.J. Super. 300 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1992

with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog while on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board … Super. 372, 380 , 575 A. 2d 45 (App.Div. 1990); State v. Todd, 238 N.J. Super. 445, 460-62 , 570 A. 2d 20 (App.Div. 1990); State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. 429, 439-41 , 547 A. 2d 743 (Law Div. 1988); State v.

State v. Hermann

160 N.J. Super. 283 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1978

A part of his letter, written at the instance of the board, reads: * * * On behalf of the Board of Education, we wish to advise your office that the Board of Education renewed the teaching contracts for these individuals … NOTES [1] Subsequently followed by State v. Bender, 159 N.J. Super. 465 (App. Div. 1978); State v. Barrett, 157 N.J. Super. 96 (App. Div. 1978); State v. Markt, 156 N.J. Super. 486 (App. Div. 1977); State v.