Case law

ANDREW REGER VS. FAIR HAVEN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-2591-19, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 2021

A-2755-19 ANDREW REGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Gooden Brown and DeAlmeida.

In re the November 2, 2010 General Election

423 N.J. Super. 190 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 2011

Princeton v. Bleiman, 71 N.J. 527 , 366 A.2d 682 (1976). … Kirk v. French, 324 N.J.Super. 548, 552 , 736 A.2d 546 (Law Div.1998)(citing Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. 185, 196 , 98 A.2d 573 (1953)).

Hennessey v. Winslow Tp.

368 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 2004

Kortenhaus v. Eli Lilly & Co., 228 N.J.Super. 162, 166 , 549 A. 2d 437, 439 (App.Div.1988). An equitable doctrine, collateral estoppel is not applied if it is unfair to do so. Kozlowski v. … Barker v.

Facher v. Bates

17 N.J. Super. 412 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 1952

Ohio 1950); and Essex Investment Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 14 N. J. Misc. 181 (Sup. Ct. 1936). No one of these cases is apposite to the instant situation. … The cited ease of City of Cleveland Heights v.

McGrogan v. Till

327 N.J. Super. 595 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 2000

Lynch v. Rubacky, 85 N.J. 65 , 424 A. 2d 1169 (1981); Knutsen v. Brown, 93 N.J.Super. 522 , 226 A. 2d 460 (Law Div. 1966), aff'd, 96 N.J.Super. 229 , 232 A. 2d 833 (App.Div.1967). … In Montells v.

Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin Lakes

179 N.J. Super. 203 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1981

In Morris v. Postma and Donadio v. … of the planning board.

State v. Lee

258 N.J. Super. 313 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 1992

Pastore v. Essex Cty., 237 N.J. Super. 371, 377 , 568 A. 2d 81 (App.Div. 1989); N.J. Turnpike Employees v. N.J. Turnpike Auth., 200 N.J. … See e.g., State v. Pitman, 201 N.J.

Division of Youth & Family Services v. M.S.

340 N.J. Super. 126 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 1, 2001

The Administrative Law judge’s forty-nine page written opinion was issued in consolidated cases titled Division of Youth and Family Services v. M.S., and In the Matter of M.S. … Serv. v. J.B., 120 N.J. 112, 127 , 576 A.2d 261 (1990). Indeed, as the Court pointed out, there is a presumption of closure to “DYFS proceedings initiated under Title 30 or Title 9.” Ibid.

State v. Moore

101 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 19, 1968

When Moore continued with his reference to Robert's, the chairman again ruled him out of order, stating that Moore was not following the procedure set by the board for the hearing — the board was not using Robert's. … Although the facts in State v.

Harvey v. ESSEX CO. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS

51 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1958

HARVEY, PLAINTIFF, v. THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF ESSEX COUNTY: EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ESSEX COUNTY; NEIL G. DUFFY, SHERIFF OF ESSEX COUNTY, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … The statute reads as follows: "The board of chosen freeholders in any county of this State having a population of more than eight hundred thousand inhabitants may retire any court attendant in the office of the sheriff, and

Crompton and Co. v. Borough of Sea Girt

1 N.J. Super. 607 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1949

Citing Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of Montclair, 124 N.J.L. at 135; Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N.J.L. 1 . See also Durkin Lumber Co. v. … In Burmore Co. v.

Estate of Neuberger v. Middletown Tp.

215 N.J. Super. 375 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1987

exercised by a planning board or board of adjustment "shall not be exercised by any other body, except as otherwise provided in this act." … Magnolia Development Co. v. Coles, 10 N.J. 223, 227 (1952). See also Kligman v. Lautman, 53 N.J. 517, 537 (1969). In Lusardi v. Curtis Point Prop.

Sims v. City of Newark

244 N.J. Super. 32 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 28, 1990

Brown v. St. Venantius School, 111 N.J. 325, 335 , 544 A. 2d 842 (1988); Yanhko v. Fane, 70 N.J. 528, 536 , 362 A. 2d 1 (1976); Liptak v. Frank, 206 N.J. … N.J.S.A. 59:2-3(a) and (c). *44 Even though a public entity has the burden of proof where the allocation of resource immunity defense is raised, Brown v. Brown, 86 N.J. 565, 578 , 432 A. 2d 493 (1981); Fox v.

State ex rel. T. E. T.

184 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1982

We find little difference between the standard of criminality established by State v. Green, supra, and State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56, 63-64 (1976), which followed the rule established in State v. … See State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 591 (1979). We find sufficient credible evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusion. State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 162 (1964); see State v. Brown, supra. Affirmed.

Farmer v. Meeker

63 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 1960

Ward v. Montgomery Tp., supra . … See Kozesnik v.

Moreira Constr. Co., Inc. v. Wayne Tp.

98 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1968

The decision of the Board of Referees shall be conclusive and binding upon both the Contractor and the Owner." … Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co., supra, 118 N.J. Eq., at p. 4 .

In re Clover Cable Systems, Inc.

199 N.J. Super. 8 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1985

Thus, the Board could not issue a certificate of approval to Clover pursuant to subsection 17b. Clear TV Cable Corp. v. Public Utility Commr’s., supra ( 85 N.J. at 47 ). … Paterson Publishing Co. v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 21 N.J. 460, 467-468 (1956); In re Micro-Cable Communications Corp., supra ( 176 N.J.Super. at 205 ). Affirmed.

In Re Application of Corbo

54 N.J. Super. 575 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 1959

Ct. 1953), certiorari denied 347 U.S. 907 , 74 S.Ct. 433 , 98 L.Ed. 1065 (1954), in language paralleling what our Supreme Court said in State v. Brown, supra : "There is but one crime called murder. … The primary reliance is upon State v. Brown, supra .

Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc. v. Ocean Twp.

59 N.J. Super. 4 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1960

Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Ocean Twp., 56 N.J. Super. 310 ( Law Div. 1959). … We also pass the question as to whether the Board of Adjustment was a necessary party respondent on the appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Miskowitz v. Union County Utilities Authority

336 N.J. Super. 183 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 5, 2001

Atlantic Coast Demolition v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 112 F.3d 652 , 669 (3d Cir.1997). Under the Third Circuit’s judgment, the stay was not to extend beyond the exhaustion of the State’s petition for certiorari. … Bd. of Educ. v. Old Bridge Educ. Ass’n, 98 N.J. 523, 531 , 489 A.2d 159 (1985); Carpenito v. Board of Educ., 322 N.J.Super. 522, 531 , 731 A.2d 538 (App.Div.1999).