Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.31s
ENVISION FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, ETC. VS. BERNARD GREEN (L-3859-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 2021
the levy is made, "mail a notice to . . . the person or business entity whose assets are to be levied on stating that a levy has been made and describing exemptions from levy and how such exemptions may be claimed by qualified … "Clearly a void judgment is not entitled to enforcement or execution under [Rule 4:59-1]." Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 1.1 on R. 4:59-1 (2022) (citing Berger v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedENVISION FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, ETC. VS. BERNARD GREEN (L-3859-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 2021
the levy is made, "mail a notice to . . . the person or business entity whose assets are to be levied on stating that a levy has been made and describing exemptions from levy and how such exemptions may be claimed by qualified … "Clearly a void judgment is not entitled to enforcement or execution under [Rule 4:59-1]." Pressler & Verniero, Current N.J. Court Rules, cmt. 1.1 on R. 4:59-1 (2022) (citing Berger v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMatter of Market Transition Facility
252 N.J. Super. 260 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1991
Its principal purpose was to assure access to automobile insurance at standard market rates to qualified persons who could not otherwise obtain insurance. N.J.S.A. 17:30E-2. … Although he does not argue that he has that authority, it is useful to rule clearly that he does not. We defer to reasonable exercises of administrative agency expertise. Henry v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 2021
This includes establishing a registry of qualified patients and issuing permits for the operation of ATCs. N.J.S.A. 24:6I-4; N.J.S.A. 24:6I-7.1; Pangaea Health & Wellness, __ N.J. … To that end, in March 2018, the Department added five new conditions to the list of those qualifying for treatment, causing a rapid increase in qualified and registered patients.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 15, 2017
Both of the State's experts opined that J.C. suffers from a qualifying mental abnormality within the scope of the statute, and meets the criteria for confinement. Dr. Goldwaser diagnosed J.C. … He is clearly as a result of this diagnosis of paraphilia predisposed to engage in acts of sexual violence as his record without question shows.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRacetrack Supermarket, LLC v. Mayor
459 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 14, 2018
There is clearly no financial relationship or related issues present here, so the court finds that factor is not implicated. … But it is the capacity to exercise good will and mature judgment in difficult circumstances that qualifies one to act as a judge at all.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 2025
If a record meets these requirements, testimony from a custodian of records or other qualified witness is not required as a condition for admission. See Biunno, Weissbard, and Zegas, Current N.J. … Here, competent proof was sufficiently provided by the surveillance footage clearly showing Gales failed to timely conduct his inmate counts.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFr. Order of Police v. City of Newark
216 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1987
The advent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS, is a prime example of a real health threat. 2. … The following cut-off values have been established for each drug or drug metabolite. These results shall be reported as negative. These cut-off figures are represented as nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
Overruled on other grounds by New Jersey Transit PBA Local 304 v. New Jersey Transit Corp., 151 N.J. 531 (1997)Cited 29 timesPublishedDcpp v. C.B. and T.B., in the Matter of L.A.B.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 2024
The evidence of withdrawal symptoms "may come from any number of competent sources[,] including medical and hospital records, health care providers, caregivers, or qualified experts." A.L., 213 N.J. at 23. … s expert was "clearly unaware of the extent of the mother's substance abuse" and, therefore, relied inappropriately on information relating to the mother's behavior during pregnancy, as opposed to "the condition of the
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Larry Bostic
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 2024
The State's position that defendant had a legal duty of care towards the victims to qualify his conduct as second-degree endangering the welfare of a child does not hold water. … Indeed, defendant's admission was used at trial to establish the cellphone was his.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedV.L. VS. HUNTERDON HEALTHCARE, LLC (L-0486-15, HUNTERDON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 2019
To establish a prima facie case of discrimination, a plaintiff must show: (1) plaintiff was handicapped or disabled within the meaning of the statute; (2) plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential … Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of discriminatory discharge, the burden shifts to the employer. Jansen, 110 N.J. at 382.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn the Matter of the Grant of Renewal Application of the Red Bank Charter School, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 2024
That said, we observed in Red Bank I that "the enrollment statistics clearly demonstrate that [RBCS] has a significantly higher percentage of non-minority students than the district schools." Id. 477-78. … RBCS's weighted lottery favored applicants who qualified as economically disadvantaged, entering their names into the lottery three times, as opposed to only twice.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAdam Dipaolo v. Board of Education, Etc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 17, 2024
Undue means has also been construed to include "basing an award on a clearly mistaken view of fact or law." Local Union 560, I.B.T. v. Eazor Express, Inc., 95 N.J. Super. 219, 227-28 (App. … Thus, plaintiff's claim he was not qualified to teach the classes because they included what he perceived to be too many students with disabilities and IEPs is not supported by, and is rather undermined by, the regulation
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn the Matter of Idesha Howard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 26, 2025
He found the Department "established by a preponderance of the competent, relevant, and credible evidence that . . . … "Trial judges are vested with the authority to propound questions to qualify a witness's testimony and to elicit material facts on their own initiative and within their sound discretion." Id. at 131.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANGELA L. OTEY (15-06-1030, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 9, 2017
"By its action, the Legislature clearly evinced an intention to rely on a judge's discretion and ability to better determine admission without continuing the prosecutor's right to veto." Id. … While the "'abuse of discretion' standard defies precise definition, it arises when a decision 'is made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 2022
contains substantial evidence to support the findings on which the agency based its action; and (3) whether in applying the legislative policies to the facts, the agency clearly … Qualifying expenses are reimbursed to the "parent . . . who is legally responsible for the child's medical expenses."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 2019
The court found Seigel qualified as an expert "in the field of property and casualty insurance, and the responsibility of insurance producers, agents and brokers." … Moreover, the umbrella endorsement plainly and clearly excludes UM and UIM coverage.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 2024
of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-4(d); and fourth-degree unlawful possession of a weapon, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(d). 2 In an order dated March 24, 2021, the court ordered defendant's examination by a qualified … A-3012-22 10 In Gaffey, our Supreme Court held dismissal of criminal charges is justified when "the [statutory] factors coalesce to establish the untenability of continuing
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSEOUNG OUK CHO VS. TRINITAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (L-0104-11, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 2019
Plaintiffs' arguments to the contrary are without merit as the evidence clearly failed to meet the threshold test for relevancy. … "[A] text will qualify as a 'reliable authority' if it represents the type of material reasonably relied on by experts in the field." Jacober, 128 N.J. at 495.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedExpress Brokerage, Etc. v. Theresa Vargas
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 6, 2024
As to plaintiff's breach of contract claim against BPASC and Vargas, the trial judge found the record clearly established a contract existed between Express and BPASC. … The doctrine's basic application is: [I]n the absence of some qualifying or oppugnant repugnant?
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna