Case law

State v. Craig

237 N.J. Super. 407 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1989

In addition, a total Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty of $17,525 was imposed. Defendant's post-trial motion to merge the seven manslaughter convictions in accordance with State v. … When confronted with this, he finally admitted that he had started the fire by lighting a brown paper bag on the porch of the residence.

Borough of Totowa v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation

7 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1950

Washington Tp. in Mercer County v. Mercer *75 County Board of Taxation, 85 N.J.L. 547 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); Ridgefield v. Goodday, 65 N.J.L. 153 ( Sup. Ct. 1900); New Jersey Zinc Co. v. … Sussex County Board, 70 N.J.L. 186 ( Sup. Ct. 1903); Town of Union in Hudson County v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, 77 N.J.L. 178 ( Sup. Ct. 1908).

Lay Fac. Assoc. v. Archdiocese of Newark

124 N.J. Super. 369 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1973

Super. 369 (1973) 307 A.2d 119 LAY FACULTY ASSOCIATION OF REGIONAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … However, if the Board concludes that it would not assert jurisdiction, * * * then we shall enter an order affirming the judgment appealed from.

Newark City Council v. James

232 N.J. Super. 449 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 24, 1989

In that case a zoning board challenged the authority of the planning board of the same municipality to grant a use variance. … , which the planning board could grant.

Fitzpatrick v. Haberman

16 N.J. Super. 490 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 5, 1951

Kan. 1924); Bosel v. Henderson Holding Co., 167 Minn. 72 , 208 N.W. 421 ( Sup. Ct. Minn. 1926); Flaharty v. Trout, 290 Pa. 315 , 138 A. 863 ( Sup. Ct. Pa. 1927); Brown v. Paterson Central Market Ass'n., 5 N.J. … In the circumstances he is not to be deemed an independent contractor because he supplied his own brushes and equipment and on a few occasions employed a helper, Brown v. Kremer, 124 N.J.L. 242 ( Sup.

Christine McQuilken v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 2024

A-1414-22 CHRISTINE MCQUILKEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. … Campbell v. N.J. Racing Comm'n, 169 N.J. 579, 587 (2001) (quoting Clowes v. Terminix Int'l, Inc., 109 N.J. 575, 588 (1988)).

Lahm v. State

112 N.J. Super. 167 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 1970

On March 29, 1965 plaintiff, a custodian employed by the Verona Board of Education (board), fell from a stepladder, striking his back against a row of wooden auditorium chairs. … DeLorenzo v. Newark, 134 N. J. L. 7 (E. & A. 1946). Compare Eckert v. New Jersey State Highway Dept., 1 N. J. 474 (1949); In re Smith, 108 N. J. Super. 315 (App. Div. 1970).

Township of East Hanover v. Cuva

156 N.J. Super. 159 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1978

See Helvering v. … Any action of a planning board purporting to do so would have been completely ultra vires and ineffective to raise an estoppel. See N.J.S.A. 40:55-39. And see Hill Homeowners v. Passaic Zon. Bd. of Adj., 129 N.J.

Vedutis v. Tesi

135 N.J. Super. 337 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 3, 1975

State v. Green, 62 N. J. 547, 554 (1973). … Here, as in Markey v.

RICHARD BARNASKAS VS. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF JACKSON (L-1637-15, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 2018

Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, 202 N.J. Super. 312, 323 (App. Div. 1985)). "In analyzing whether a use is customarily incident to the permitted use, two determinations must be made. … In that regard, Charlie Brown is distinguishable.

MONICA MALONE VS. CITY OF BRIGANTINE (L-6601-14, L-2493-17 AND L-0953-18, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2021

Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment for Twp. of Chatham, 202 N.J. Super. 312, 323 (App. Div. 1985) (quoting 6 Powell, Law of Real Property ¶ 869 (1979)). … Allied Realty v. Borough of Upper Saddle River, 221 N.J. Super. 407, 415–16 (App. Div. 1987) (citing Charlie Brown of Chatham, 202 N.J. Super. at 318, 327).

Bergen Cty. Freeholder Bd. v. BERGEN CTY. PROS'R

172 N.J. Super. 363 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1980

Super. 363 (1980) 412 A.2d 130 IN THE MATTER OF BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, APPELLANT, v. … The Bergen County Board of Chosen Freeholders appeals.

Asbell v. PEARL ASSURANCE CO., LTD.

59 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1960

Leaving a structure open to the incursions of vagrants, Goldman v. Piedmont Fire Ins. … Krieg v. Phoenix Insurance Co., 116 N.J.L. 467, 474 ( E. & A. 1936).

Texas Eastern Trans. Corp. v. Bor. of Carteret

116 N.J. Super. 9 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1970

Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of Newark, 10 N.J. 99, 105 (1952). … Riverview Gardens Section One v. North Arlington Borough, 9 N.J. 167, 174-175 (1952).

IN RE THE 2020 MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION FOR THE OFFICE OF BOROUGH COUNCIL FOR SOUTH TOMS RIVER (L-2956-20, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 2021

See State v. … State v. Mauti, 208 N.J. 519, 539 (2012) (quoting Mitchell v. Alfred Hofmann, Inc., 48 N.J. Super. 396, 405 (App. Div. 1958)). Nothing the Board did before the trial court constitutes a waiver.

Moss v. State

178 N.J. Super. 460 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 1981

Petitioner, a social worker for the Hillsborough Township Board of Education, appeals from a determination by the Board of Trustees of the Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund (TPAF) that purchased service credit based upon … Imbriacco v. Civil Service Comm’n, 150 N.J.Super. 105, 109 (App.Div.1977).

Sinoway v. Village of South Orange

104 N.J. Super. 477 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1969

Super. 477 (1969) 250 A.2d 429 RUSSELL SINOWAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … The board denied the relief sought.

Hill v. Bd. of Adjust., Bor. of Eatontown

122 N.J. Super. 156 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1972

HILL, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JERRY CERAN AND EDITH V. CERAN, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Isko v. Planning Board, Tp. of Livingston, 51 N.J. 162, 174 (1968).

Finston v. Town of Nutley

1 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1948

Crescent Hill, Inc. v. Allendale, 118 N.J. Law 302 (S.C. 1937). … If the record before us showed clearly that prosecutors were entitled to the permit, we might well grant the mandamus, even though the appeal to the Board of Adjustment had not been pursued. Lane v. Bigelow, 135 N.J.

In re Certain Amendments to the Adopted & Approved Solid Waste Management Plan

214 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1986

of Public Utilities (Board). 1. … In Philadelphia v.