Case law

Kopezynski v. County of Camden

1 N.J. Super. 121 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1948

See Dikowski v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 128 N.J.L. 124 (E. A. 1942). … See Hoboken v. Gear, 27 N.J.L. 265 (Sup.Ct. 1859).

Jones v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, LONG BEACH TP.

28 N.J. Super. 483 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 25, 1953

JONES AND ALICE HENSHAW JONES, PLAINTIFFS, v. … In the case of Iannella v. Johnson, 136 N.J.L. 514 , at page 517 ( Sup.

Esso Standard Oil v. Bd. of Adjustment, Newark

16 N.J. Super. 409 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1951

Super. 409 (1951) 84 A.2d 667 ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided December 3, 1951. *410 Messrs. … At the hearing before the board, a number of collateral issues were gone into, none of which has any bearing upon the single question as to whether the action of the board was reasonable.

Mayor & Council of Town of Kearny v. Clark

213 N.J. Super. 152 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1986

Williamson, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for Edward Clark, Hudson County Executive, The Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, ( Joseph V. Kealy, Jr., Acting County Counsel, attorney). … The County Executive and Board of Freeholders apparently listened to local objections and considered them. Rutgers v. Piluso, supra , requires nothing more. In Berger v.

De Benedetti v. Township of River Vale

21 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 25, 1952

Collins v. … It was held in Collins v.

Pinilla v. BD. OF REVIEW DEP'T OF LABOR AND IND.

155 N.J. Super. 307 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1978

Super. 307 (1978) 382 A.2d 921 ALICIA PINILLA, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF NEW JERSEY, AND HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS. … See Valenti v. Board of Review, 4 N.J. 287 (1950); Alonso v. California, 50 Cal. App. 3d 242 , 123 Cal. Rptr. 536 (D. Ct. App. 1975) cert. den., 425 U.S. 903 , 96 S.Ct. 1492 , 47 L.Ed. 2d 752 (1976); Zapata v.

Courtney v. Shore Memorial Hosp.

245 N.J. Super. 138 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 21, 1990

See Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hosp., 107 N.J. 240, 249 , 526 A. 2d 697 (1987); Garrow v. Elizabeth General Hospital and Dispensary, 79 N.J. 549, 565 , 401 A. 2d 533 (1979). … See Nanavati v. Burdette Tomlin Memorial Hosp., supra, 107 N.J. at 254 , 526 A. 2d 697 .

Savad v. Corrections Dep't

178 N.J. Super. 386 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1981

by the Special Classification Review Board. … State v.

Pennyton Homes Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Stanhope

78 N.J. Super. 588 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 4, 1963

Super. 588 (1963) 189 A.2d 838 PENNYTON HOMES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. … Levin v. Livingston Tp., 35 N.J. 500, 507 (1961). This does not mean that the legitimate interests of the developer are to be forgotten.

Elm Land Co., Inc. v. Glasser

69 N.J. Super. 290 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1961

Ct. 1935) (not officially reported); and Brown v. Christian, 97 N.J.L. 56 ( Sup. Ct. 1922) (buyer has until midnight of the tenth day in which to redeem under the Conditional Sales Act, R.S. 46:32-1 et seq. ). … In Labash v. Mancini, 14 N.J. Super. 116 ( Ch.

HURST BY HURST v. Glock, Inc.

295 N.J. Super. 165 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 1996

Note: Browning is credited with the design of the first mass produced semi-automatic pistol. The Browning Model 1000. His above patent comments are made in light of his previous experience. … This section of the Act has been definitively interpreted by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Roberts v.

Albanese v. MacHetto

7 N.J. Super. 188 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 1950

Ferry v. Williams, 41 N.J.L. 332 ( Sup. Ct. 1879); Schwartz v. Essex County, etc., 129 Id. 129 ( Sup. Ct. 1942); affirmed, 130 Id. 177 ( E. & A. 1943). … In Haines v. Burlington Co. Bridge Comm., 1 N.J. Super. 163 ( App.

Trugman v. Reichenstein

50 N.J. Super. 377 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1958

Brady v. … In Schwartz v. Wachlin, 89 N.J.L. 39 ( Sup.

In re Special Police Officers

354 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 2002

Elec. & Gas Co., 167 N.J. 377, 384 , 771 A.2d 1163 (2001); National Waste Recycling, Inc. v. MCIA, 150 N.J. 209, 228 , 695 A.2d 1381 (1997). … See, e.g., In re M.F., 169 N.J. 45, 56 , 776 A.2d 780 (2001); Brock v. Public Serv. Elec. & Gas Co., 149 N.J. 378, 383 , 693 A.2d 894 (1997).

Fentron Architectural Metals Corp. v. Romagnino

69 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1961

Hand v. Howell, 61 N.J.L. 142, 146 ( Sup. Ct. 1897), affirmed 61 N.J.L. 694 ( E. & A. 1898); see also Mattocks v. Lyman, 16 Vt. 113 ( Sup. Ct. 1844); Fenno v. Weston, 31 Vt. 345 ( Sup. Ct. 1858); Mahoney v. … Riley v. Weigand, 18 N.J. Super. 66 ( App. Div. 1952).

Kearny Court Associates v. Spence

262 N.J. Super. 241 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1993

Super. 241 (1993) 620 A.2d 1056 KEARNY COURT ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND NEW JERSEY REALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BARRY SPENCE, EDISON RENT CONTROL BOARD AND PAMELA M. … (Board), and two tenants of Landlord's building.

Manalapan Builders v. TP. COMMITTEE

256 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 1992

Partnership v. Clinton Tp., 718 F. … Similarly, Kaplan v. City of Linwood, 252 N.J.

State ex rel. L.L.

265 N.J. Super. 68 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1993

See Doe v. State, 165 N.J.Super. 392, 403-06 , 398 A.2d 562 (App.Div.1979); W.C. v. P.M., 155 N.J.Super. 555, 563-66, 383 A.2d 125 (App.Div.1978); New Jersey Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. … Moreover, while the Act no doubt vests wide discretion in both the Division and the Board to devise and recommend a plan, the trial court is not bound by it.

State v. Grubb

319 N.J. Super. 386 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1999

State v. Johnson, supra, 127 N.J. at 478 , 606 A. 2d 315 . … State v. Reyes, 50 N.J. 454, 458-59 , 236 A. 2d 385 (1967).

IN THE MATTER OF BELLEVILLE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION AND BELLEVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION BELLEVILLE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION VS. BELLEVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION (PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION, AND L-7237-15, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(CONSOLIDATED)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 16, 2018

Cummings v. Bahr, 295 N.J. Super. 374, 384 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting D'Atria v. D'Atria, 242 N.J. Super. 392, 401 (Ch. Div. 1990)). … Badiali v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Group, 220 N.J. 544, 559 (2015); see also Guido v. Duane Morris LLP, 202 N.J. 79, 91 n. 4, (2010); Mount Holly Twp. Bd. of Educ. v. Mount Holly Twp. Educ.