Case law

Masterson v. Christopher Diner, Inc.

85 N.J. Super. 267 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 1964

He also maintained that the case was controlled by Keystone Lunch, Inc. v. First Criminal Court of Newark, 22 N.J. Misc. 82 , 35 A. 2 d 472 ( Sup. Ct. 1944), and Zeltner v. Watson, 14 N.J. Super. 127 ( Law Div. 1951). … And see 8 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 d ed. 1957), § 25.72, p. 160 et seq.; Maplewood v. Tannenhaus, 64 N.J. Super. 80, 89 ( App. Div. 1960).

In re the Account of Dissenger

39 N.J. Eq. 227 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1884

Although he says he always intended to charge the ward for board, there should be •no allowance either for board or clothing'while she was a member of his family—that is, up to the time of her mother’s death. … Haggerty v. McCanna, 10 C. E. Gr. 48. But he is entitled to be repaid the money he paid to Mrs. Carl for her board. The relation between them had been changed when he put her to board with Mrs. Carl.

State v. Anaya

238 N.J. Super. 31 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1990

In addition, the court imposed separate $1,000 Drug Enforcement and Demand Reduction (DEDR) penalties and $50 lab fees on each count, as *34 well as a $30 Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty. … See also State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. 429 , 547 A. 2d 743 (Law Div. 1988); State v. Rodriguez, 225 N.J. Super. 466 , 542 A. 2d 966 (Law Div. 1988); State v. Morales, supra, 224 N.J. Super. at 78 , 539 A. 2d 769 . IV.

PUB. HEALTH COUN. v. Franklin Tp. Bd. of Health

108 N.J. Super. 239 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1970

Super. 239 (1970) 260 A.2d 859 THE PUBLIC HEALTH COUNCIL OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF HEALTH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … See also Edgeboro v. East Brunswick Tp., 31 N.J. Super, 238, 245, 246 ( Ch. Div. 1954); Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp., 120 N.J.L. 463, 468 ( Sup. Ct. 1938).

State v. Harvey

273 N.J. Super. 572 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1994

To the extent that State v. … case the board did grant defendant credit.

City of Bayonne v. Marburger

100 N.J. Super. 87 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1968

This is an appeal from a determination of the State Board of Education (State Board) unanimously affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Education (Commissioner) denying the request of the Bayonne School District (Bayonne … Accordingly, the determination of the State Board of Education is affirmed.

Conklin v. Automotive Conveying of NJ

71 N.J. Super. 153 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 21, 1961

Brown) that there had been "an abandonment of the employer's business at the time of the accident." … As to the merits, we agree with and adopt as our own the opinion of Judge Brown.

Public Interest Research Group of NJ, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF ENVIR. PROTECTION

152 N.J. Super. 191 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 11, 1977

Super. at 154 ; Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kandle, 105 N.J. Super. 104, 118 (App. Div.), aff'd o.b. 54 N.J. 11 (1969). See also, Norwegian Nitrogen Prod. Co. v. … Co. v.

Matter of Morrison

216 N.J. Super. 143 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1987

See id., N.J.S.A. 11:15-6; Ciff v. Morris County Board of Social Services, 197 N.J. Super. 307, 315 (App.Div. 1984), rev'd on other grounds 101 N.J. 251 (1985); Borough of East Paterson v. … In Public Advocate Dep't. v. Public Utilities Bd., 189 N.J. Super. 491 (App.Div. 1983) the Hackensack Water Company filed a petition for a rate increase with the Board of Public Utilities.

State v. Malone

164 N.J. Super. 47 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 1978

Ricker v. Lawson, 155 N. J. Super. 536 (Cty. Ct. 1977). Indeed, defendants do not dispute that they are bound to so provide assistance in accordance with the law. Cf. General Assistance Manual § 10:85-2.1. … Such operation by the mayor and board of commissioners shall continue only until the appointment of members of the local assistance board, and such board’s appointment of a director of welfare.

Dai v. Community Medical Center

295 N.J. Super. 206 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 1996

This interpretive theme was adopted by the Supreme Court in Brown v. St. … Ramos v.

Gayder v. Spiotta

206 N.J. Super. 556 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1985

See Vasquez v. … See generally Grimes v. Miller, 113 N.J.L. 553 (Sup.Ct.1934); Tp. Committee of Tp. of Hazlet v. Morales, 119 N.J.Super. 29 (Law Div.1972). And cf. Stevens ex rel. Kuberski v.

Penn Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Joyce

75 N.J. Super. 275 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 5, 1962

See also the discussion in Cropper v. Brown, supra, 76 N.J. … Bank & Trust Co. v. MacGarvie, 22 N.J. 539, 545 (1956); Pennsylvania Co., etc. v. Broad St. Hospital, supra ; Lansing v. Goelet, 9 Cow. 346, 391 , 9 N.Y. Com. Law Repts. 664, 669 (1827); Brown v.

New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. v. Griffin

253 N.J. Super. 173 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 4, 1991

In Smelkinson v. Ethel & Mac Corp., 178 N.J. … Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. Concord Ins., 110 N.J. Super. 191, 198 , 264 A. 2d 757 (Law Div. 1970).

Angel v. BD. OF ADJ. OF FRANKLIN TP.

109 N.J. Super. 194 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1970

Plaintiffs Jack and Maxine Angel appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Board of Adjustment of the Township of Franklin. … Finally, we are convinced from a review of the record that the board of adjustment did not act arbitrarily, capriciously or unreasonably when it denied plaintiffs' request to recommend a use variance. Kramer v.

Albigese v. City of Jersey City

138 N.J. Super. 260 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 24, 1975

Allison v. Corker, Assessor, 67 N. J. L. 596, 600-601 (E. & A. 1902); State v. DeLouisa, 89 N. J. Super. 596, 602-603 (Law Div. 1963); 82 C. J. S., Statutes, § 248 at 417. But cf. Lassiter v. Atlantic City, 86 N. J. … The Bent Leveling Board was a de facto board existing by color of municipal authority even though the ordinance which created the Board expired and the ordinance and resolution which attempted to extend its existence were

Tubridy v. CONSOLIDATED, ETC., PENSION COMMISSION

84 N.J. Super. 257 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1964

We are satisfied, as was the Pension Board, that the position of fire commissioner on the Board of Public Safety was essentially an administrative office in the Department of Public Safety, not that of an "active member" … See Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape May, 19 N.J. 493 , 504-505 *264 (1955). Excess pension deductions from plaintiff's salary have been tendered back to him.

FOSTER-HYATT GROUP, ETC. v. W. Caldwell Plan. Bd.

174 N.J. Super. 10 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 1980

The application was made to the planning board pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-60(a). See Cranmer v. Evesham Tp., 162 N.J. Super. 204, 210-213 (Law Div. 1978). The property in question is located in a B-3 commercial zone. … We here only decide that the board's adherence to the current B-3 zoning scheme was not arbitrary and capricious in this case. See Wallington Home Owners v. Wallington, 130 N.J.

Landau v. Township of Teaneck

231 N.J. Super. 586 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1989

The statutory requirement for planning board approval of conditional uses is met by the provisions in both the bid specifications and the contract for such approval before construction. Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. … Board of Education of Voc. School v. Finne, 88 N.J. Super. 91 (Law Div. 1965). The selling of public lands by the Township of Teaneck is clearly proprietary and binding if regular and reasonable.

Hardwicke v. American Boychoir

368 N.J. Super. 71 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 2004

Board owed to the school's students. … V.