Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
0.72s
ALEX ROSA VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 2021
Guided by these principles, we conclude the DOC's decision is not accompanied by the necessary findings of fact to establish that Rosa encouraged a riot. … She qualified her findings by adding, "[a]ny behavior that is not compliant with staff orders can be viewed as encouraging and inciting non-compliant behaviors."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFRANCES GRAU VS. AHS HOSPITAL CORP.L-695-14, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 2017
The judge found that plaintiff's shoulder injury qualified as a disability under the LAD. … Such action is considered an unlawful employment practice "unless it can be clearly shown that a person's disability would prevent such person from performing a particular
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedIn the Matter of Mina Ekladious, Jersey City, Department of Public Safety
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2024
To qualify as Tier-1, an academy must adhere to the standards outlined in N.J.A.C. 5:73-2.2(c). When an academy is designated as Tier-1, it may establish additional local jurisdictional requirements. … inquiries: (1) whether the agency's decision conforms with relevant law; (2) whether the decision is supported by substantial credible evidence in the record; and (3) whether in applying the law to the facts, the agency clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedROBERT A. NOLAN v. GURBIR S. GREWAL (DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 2022
distinction, between legitimate and illegitimate interests, is important because "[t]he 'substantial impact' test alone" sets a low bar and "may not be sufficient to isolate those internal agency statements that remain immune … Section II, for example, establishes standards for law enforcement interactions with "any individual."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHarris v. Peridot Chem.(NJ), Inc.
313 N.J. Super. 257 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1998
Beyond this, the evidence of remedial measures clearly fell within an exception to the general prohibition of the Rule. … Clearly, the error would have been dissipated had a timely objection been interposed. State v. Macon, 57 N.J. at 337 , 273 A. 2d 1 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedP.T. VS. A.T. (FM-06-0217-09, CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 2021
A court has the authority and even sometimes the obligation to restrict or terminate parental rights but may exercise that authority only when credible evidence clearly and convincingly establishes parental unfitness or … The parties shall be permitted to present evidence and call witnesses and the court may consider the testimony of any qualified psychologist or expert proffered by the parties or appointed by the court.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLISA HUNT VS. VIRTUA HEALTH, INC.(L-4509-11, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 14, 2017
Halbridge had not rendered such an opinion and Johnson, a nurse practitioner, could not "establish medical causation." … Kopelove, they failed to recognize the presence of repetitive variable and late decelerations in the presence of significantly reduced variability that clearly indicated that the fetus was experiencing
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJersey Shore Beach and Boardwalk Co. Inc. v. Borough of Keansburg
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 2024
Applying these well-established principles, we defer to the trial court's finding that Eastman was more credible than Jersey Shore's experts. … Nonetheless, the judge's mention of the statutes did not control his decision and were "clearly [not] capable of producing an unjust result."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedANSON B. ORR VS. NAQUEA JOHNSON (FD-07-2874-18, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 2020
She claimed Jimmy's "home state" was Virginia where he was born, received his immunizations, was enrolled in day care and resided with his siblings. … The court concluded that either of the two states could qualify as the child's home state but neither could assert priority over the other.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished354 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 2002
The judge rejected her application concluding that she had failed to meet her burden to establish the necessity and cost of these items. … Defendant's income qualified as that as a high earner when the original judgment was entered. He was earning approximately $600,000 per year and this figure has increased to one million dollars per year.
Cited 41 timesPublishedWELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS. ALFRED G. ROCKEFELLER (F-022533-12, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 20, 2017
Even so, Wells Fargo reviewed defendants' application several times, but they did not qualify for a second loan modification. … The federal class action settlement clearly resolves defendants' claims and defenses pertaining to the origination of their "Pick-a-Payment" loan.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. L.M.
430 N.J. Super. 428 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 12, 2013
Katz admitted that there was no current bond between Peter and Sally, he testified that, with effort, a bond could be established between them. … When parents in a Title Nine or Title Thirty matter seek appointment of counsel, the parents must fill out a form demonstrating that they are indigent and qualify for appointed counsel.
Cited 25 timesPublishedState of New Jersey v. Momodu F. Rogers
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 2025
The record clearly reflects that defendant and counsel were aware of his immigration consequences. C. … In determining whether defendant received IAC, on remand the PCR court should decide: (1) if defendant had a substance abuse dependency that would qualify him for Recovery Court; (2) could that dependency have been known
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Sergio Derosa
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2025
N.J.R.E. 702, which states: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified … Clearly, a plea agreement was A-1335-23 14 extended, and [defendant] rejected that offer, on
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 2020
A-3704-18T3 11 Division established "clearly and convincingly by substantial and credible evidence" that defendant's parental rights should be terminated. … See Rule 2:10-2 ("Any error or omission shall be disregarded by the appellate court unless it is of such a nature as to have been clearly capable of producing an unjust result.").
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 2019
The exam was open only to sheriff's officers who are qualified pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(b), which requires that "applicants for promotion from entry level law enforcement or firefighter titles shall have three years … The statute only refers to the power of the CSC to establish certain types of reemployment lists.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJaclyn, Inc. v. Edison Brothers Stores, Inc.
170 N.J. Super. 334 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 29, 1979
Documentary evidence established that Mrs. … The leading case which established that principle, Ballin v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 20, 2017
Specifically, PERC found the language "which cannot be arbitrarily or selectively established" in 23.J.2 allowed the criteria established by the employer to be second-guessed by an arbitrator. … The responsibilities are clearly delineated.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished300 N.J. Super. 37 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 21, 1997
that the juror’s inability to serve was based on reasons peculiar to her which would not have tainted the jury, that the nature of her disclosures showed she had not spoken to the other jurors, and there were alternate, qualified … That ruling was consonant with the established principles of law. State v. Diaz, 144 N.J. 628, 637-40 , 677 A.2d 1120 (1996). XVIII In his Point XVI, defendant contends that his sentence was excessive.
Cited 25 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 2021
The statements clearly implicate both defendants, who are co-conspirators. … Although we agree with defendants, ultimately the error is harmless because Kopp would have qualified as an expert.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna