Case law

Fulginiti v. Cape May County Sheriff's Dept.

199 N.J. Super. 56 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1985

See AMN, Inc. of N.J. v. South Brunswick Twp. Rent Leveling Board, 93 N.J. 518, 525 (1983). … Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 (1896); see also Smith v. United States, 337 U.S. 137 , 69 S.Ct. 1000 , 93 L.Ed. 1264 (1949).

State v. Malone

164 N.J. Super. 47 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 1978

Ricker v. Lawson, 155 N. J. Super. 536 (Cty. Ct. 1977). Indeed, defendants do not dispute that they are bound to so provide assistance in accordance with the law. Cf. General Assistance Manual § 10:85-2.1. … Such operation by the mayor and board of commissioners shall continue only until the appointment of members of the local assistance board, and such board’s appointment of a director of welfare.

GRAND VIEW GARDENS, INC. v. Hasbrouck Heights

14 N.J. Super. 167 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1951

See Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp., 4 N.J. 135, 142 (1950). … Meltzer v. Division of Tax Appeals, 134 N.J.L. 510, 512 ( Sup. Ct. 1946).

In Re Hennion

131 N.J. Eq. 293 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 16, 1942

Rep. 293 ; Moffit v. Witherspoon, 32 N.C. 185 ; Malone v. Adams, 113 Ga. 791 ; 39 S.E. Rep. 507 ; Wise v. Wynn, 59 Miss. 588 ; Cuddy v. Brown, 78 Ill. 415 ; Harvick v. Modern Woodmen of America, 158 Ill. App.? … In Cuddy v. Brown, 78 Ill. 415 , testimony of this character was admitted without objection and the holding in that respect has never been overruled or questioned. In Wise v.

State v. Anaya

238 N.J. Super. 31 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1990

In addition, the court imposed separate $1,000 Drug Enforcement and Demand Reduction (DEDR) penalties and $50 lab fees on each count, as *34 well as a $30 Violent Crimes Compensation Board penalty. … See also State v. Brown, 227 N.J. Super. 429 , 547 A. 2d 743 (Law Div. 1988); State v. Rodriguez, 225 N.J. Super. 466 , 542 A. 2d 966 (Law Div. 1988); State v. Morales, supra, 224 N.J. Super. at 78 , 539 A. 2d 769 . IV.

Hernandez v. Overlook Hosp.

291 N.J. Super. 462 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1995

in order to become board certified. … In Todd v.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. EDWARD O'DAY (14-09-2469, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 7, 2017

Citing State v. Brown, 216 N.J. 508 (2014) and United States v. Harrison, 689 F. 3d 301 (3d Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1242, 133 S. … [State v. Alston, 88 N.J. 211, 228 (1981)]; accord [Brown, supra, 216 N.J. at 548-49].

Boldt v. CORPESPONDENCE MANGAEMENT

320 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 1999

See IPCO Safety Corp. v. … Boss v.

Atanasio v. Silverman

11 N.J. Super. 116 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1950

Trapp v. Brown, 93 N. J. L. 171 (E. & A. 1919), as cited by plaintiff, is not dispositive of the problem presented here. … “Distinguished in Brown ads. Hendrickson, 10 Vr. 241.” (Brown ads. Hendrickson, 39 N. J. L. 239 (Sup. Ct. 1877). In McAdams v. Randolph, 42 N. J. L. 332 (Sup. Ct. 1880), .

Wacht v. Farooqui

312 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 1998

See Cornblatt v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218 , 708 A.2d 401 (1998). … The Legislature clearly recognized, as did our Supreme Court in Rosenberg by Rosenberg v. Cahill, 99 N.J. 318, 331-34 , 492 A.2d 371 (1985) and in Sanzari v.

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY v. Midlantic Motion X-Ray, Inc.

325 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 1999

The court in Allstate Ins. v. … The Supreme Court in Thermographic Diagnostics v.

Township of Edison v. Hyland

156 N.J. Super. 137 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1978

Super. 137 (1978) 383 A.2d 714 TOWNSHIP OF EDISON ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM F. HYLAND, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM F. HYLAND, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BD. OF HEALTH, HILLSDALE BOROUGH v. Tandy & Allen

29 N.J. Super. 61 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1953

Super. 61 (1953) 101 A.2d 617 BOARD OF HEALTH, BOROUGH OF HILLSDALE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TANDY & ALLEN, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND GORDON HALL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … of the plumbing code adopted by the said board.

Scheff v. Township of Maple Shade

149 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1977

Matawan v. Monmouth Cty. Tax Bd., 51 N.J. 291, 300 (1968); Lemke v. Bailey, 41 N.J. 295 , 301 (1963); Egan v. Erie R. Co., 29 N.J. 243, 250 (1959); Barringer v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139, 144 (1951); Lill v. … Div. 1976); Closter Service Stations, Inc. v. Ridgefield Park Board of Com'rs, 99 N.J. Super. 69, 75 (App. Div. 1968).

Matter of Bergen County Util. Auth.

230 N.J. Super. 411 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 1, 1989

Hiering v. Board of Trustees of Public Employees, 197 N.J. Super. 14, 19 (App.Div. 1984). BPU must provide some insight into its reasoning in order to enable us to make that determination. … Vincent's Hospital v. Finley, 154 N.J. Super. 24, 29-33 (App.Div. 1977); Rowley v. Board of Education of Manalapan-Englishtown, 205 N.J. Super. 65 (App.Div. 1985).

Borough of Oceanport v. Hughes

186 N.J. Super. 109 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 1982

Crescent Park Tenants Ass’n v. Realty Equities Corp. of N.Y., 58 N.J. 98 (1971), and see Salorio v. Glaser, 82 N.J. 482 (1980). … Wilbert v. DeCamp, 72 N.J.Super. 60 (App.Div.1962).

Proprietary Assn. v. BD. OF PHARMACY OF NJ

27 N.J. Super. 204 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 20, 1953

In Board of Pharmacy of State of New Jersey v. Braunstein, 2 N.J. Misc. 454 ( Sup. … In Crescent Bottling Works v. Board of Pharmacy, 121 N.J.

Marlboro Tp. v. HOLMDEL PLAN. BD.

279 N.J. Super. 638 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1995

In Nunziato v. Edgewater Planning Bd., 225 N.J. … Ass'n. v. Bernards Tp., 108 N.J. 223, 233 , 528 A. 2d 555 (1987); Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp., 52 N.J. 348, 350-351 , 245 A. 2d 336 (1968); West Park Ave., Inc. v.

Forte v. THE BOROUGH OF TENAFLY

106 N.J. Super. 346 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1969

(board) for approval of its site plan and parking area. … Corp. v. Jersey City, 122 N.J.L. 292 ( Sup. Ct. 1939)), but if the exclusion of competition happens to be an incident or effect of otherwise valid zoning, it does not invalidate it.

State v. Kadonsky

288 N.J. Super. 41 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 29, 1996

Alan Dexter Bowman argued the cause for appellant ( Brown and Brown, attorneys; Raymond A. Brown, on the brief). Gerard C. Sims, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Deborah T. … Kadonsky, that the statute, that the case [ State v. Alexander, 264 N.J.