Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • Matera v. M.G.C.C. Group, Inc.

    402 N.J. Super. 30 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 13, 2007

    In Lemelledo v. … In Gennari v. Weichert Co.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robert Strauss v. Board of Education of the Borough of Metuchen, Etc.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 2024

    A-1492-22 ROBERT STRAUSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, MIDDLESEX COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent. … See also State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Downs v. Winslow

    105 N.J. Super. 54 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 12, 1969

    In view of what happened in the trial of the consolidated cases, we question the trial court’s holding (Downs v. Winslow, 97 N. J. … Shebell v. Strelecki, 104 N. J. Super. 139 (App. Div. 1969). Since the Downs judgment against Winslow was less than the $1,400 paid to Downs by Di lonno’s carrier, the Eund owes Downs nothing. Reversed. No costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Livingston v. NJ STATE BD. OF MED. EXAMINERS

    168 N.J. Super. 259 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1979

    LIVINGSTON, M.D., AND METROPOLITAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 24, 1979. … It does not follow, however, that the Board must advocate a rule which in its opinion would be deleterious to maternal health. As the Supreme Court explained in Maher v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SP v. Collier High School

    319 N.J. Super. 452 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1999

    The third party complaint was filed against the Township of Monroe, the Monroe Township Board of Education ("Board") and H.C. … Plaintiff also asserted that the Township and Board would suffer no prejudice because of the Board's investigation into her complaints.

    Abrogated by Twanda Jones v. Morey’s Pier, Inc. (077502) (Cape May and Statewide), 230 N.J. 142 (2017)Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State v. Webster

    383 N.J. Super. 432 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 2006

    Similarly, in Salvador v. Dept. of Corr., 378 N.J.Super. 467 , 876 A. 2d 309 (App. … See Higgins v. Pascack Valley Hosp., 158 N.J. 404, 418-19 , 730 A. 2d 327 (1999).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Chee Ng, ph.D. v. Fairleigh Dickinson University

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 16, 2024

    Following the university president's recommendation, the FDU Board of Trustees (Board) terminated Dr. … In Lipman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brenner and Co. v. Perl

    72 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1962

    Breen v. Levine, 32 N.J. Super. 525 ( App. Div. 1954); Schwartz v. … Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Rice, 4 N.J. 169, 180 (1950); Sustick v. Slatina, 48 N.J. Super. 134 ( App. Div. 1957); McCue v. Deppert, 21 N.J. Super. 591, 595 ( App. Div. 1952); Louis Kamm, Inc. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Borough of Haledon v. Borough of North Haledon

    358 N.J. Super. 289 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 2003

    In Pascarella v. … Odatalla v. Odatalla, 355 N.J.Super. 305, 314 , 810 A. 2d 93 (Ch.Div. 2002) (citing Garlinger v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • L.S. Village, Inc. v. Township of Lawrence

    8 N.J. Tax 327 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1986

    Point V Estoppel Should Be Applied to Prevent the Limitations Defense. … Southbridge Park, Inc. v. Borough of Fort Lee, 201 N.J.Super. 91, 94 , 492 A.2d 1026 (App.Div.1985). Affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Iorio v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SEC.

    88 N.J. Super. 141 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 10, 1965

    Kobylarz v. Mercer, 130 N.J.L. 44, 52 ; Brandon v. Board of Com'rs of Town of Montclair, 124 N.J.L. 135 ; affirmed, 125 N.J.L. 367 . … Hodes v. Oak Flooring Co., 43 N.J. 359 (1964). The judgment of the Board of Review is affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Cale

    19 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 1952

    Medical Examiners v. Giedroyc, 91 N.J.L. 61, 62 ( Sup. Ct. 1918)); it is an ordinary civil action ( Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 N.J.L. 54 ( Sup. … Neely v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Joan Vanucci v. Dr. Samuel D. Schenker, M.D.

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 2024

    In Tyler v. … Brown is board certified in pain management and that Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Parker

    15 N.J. Super. 412 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 4, 1951

    In 1942 he received from its board of managers a parole embodying written terms and conditions which he expressly accepted. … Ct. 1951); Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359 , 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1937); Harding v. State Board of Parole, 307 Mass. 217 , 29 N.E. 2 d 756 (1940). See 24 C.J.S., p. 1240 (1941). The petition is dismissed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Township of Montville

    109 N.J. Super. 511 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 1970

    . *523 S.A. 40:55-35 requires that the proposed revision of the ordinance be first submitted to the planning board for "approval, disapproval or suggestions," and that the board have a reasonable time, not less than 30 days … The board's resolution approving the proposed amendment satisfied the statutory requirement.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Ascione v. Union City

    77 N.J. Super. 542 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 14, 1962

    See *551 Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton, 133 N.J.L. 230, 237 ( Sup. Ct. 1945), cited in Greenway Homes v. River Edge, 137 N.J.L. 453, 458 ( Sup. Ct. 1948). … Board of Adjustment, Newark, 9 N.J. 405 (1952), and Rockhill v. Chesterfield Twp., 23 N.J. 117 (1957).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brockwell Contract v. Kearny Bd.

    420 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 2011

    Super. 273 BROCKWELL & CARRINGTON CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEARNY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Hall Construction, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and Dobco, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. … He relied primarily on the EFCFA and our holding in Advance Electric Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Bonsanto's Application

    171 N.J. Super. 356 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1979

    R. 4:46-2; Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 74-75 (1954). … The responsibility to assure that only properly qualified persons are registered to vote is vested in the county board of elections. Cf. Carroll v. Cobb, 139 N.J. Super. 439, 448-449 (App.Div. 1976).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Elon Associates, L.L.C. v. Township of Howell

    370 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2004

    In Sod Farm, Assocs. v. … Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Levitt and Sons, Inc. v. TP. OF FREEHOLD

    120 N.J. Super. 595 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 22, 1972

    [at 443-444] See Sussex Woodlands, Inc. v. Mayor and Council of Tp. of West Milford, 109 N.J. Super. 432, 434-438 (Law Div. 1970). Cf., J.D. Land Corp. v. Allen, 114 N.J. Super. 503, 508 (App. Div. 1971). … Builders Ass'n v. Mayor E.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.