Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,442 results
1.47s
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 22, 2019
The order established deadlines for filing necessary applications and documents related to construction. … The law also provided that loans "shall be subject to an agreement between the authority and the qualified housing sponsor which will subject said qualified housing sponsor . . . to limitations established by the authority
Cited 0 timesUnpublished269 N.J. Super. 246 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 1993
Defendant and Matalucci clearly heard this comment according to Pandullo. Pandullo said he could not afford such a payoff. He claimed that he previously had made similar payoffs to obtain work in Cumberland County. … He was also granted "use" immunity with respect to any testimony at trial.
Cited 7 timesPublished25 N.J. Super. 342 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 13, 1953
That is established law, and conceded. … "The statute is to be read, not under the necessity of finding fixed phraseology, but to ascertain its intent, because this intent, clearly found, will *350 prevail." Carroll v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGonzalez v. State of New Jersey Apportionment Commission
428 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 10, 2012
be elected by the legally qualified voters of each Assembly district. … The Court in Mahan, supra, clearly backed away from its previous rigid and unyielding one-man, one-vote stance and permitted states a greater percentage deviation in redistricting if a rational state policy was effectuated
Cited 22 timesPublishedGeorganne Youngclaus v. Residential Home Funding Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 5, 2024
This claim qualified as a discrete alleged act of discrimination under LAD, which states: "It shall be an unlawful employment practice . . . … Furthermore, we reverse the trial court's rulings the acts preceding the alleged wrongful termination qualified as discrete acts, rather than a continuing violation.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished444 N.J. Super. 423 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 24, 2015
Defendant, K.S., filed and served a four-count counter-claim and answer, seeking: 1) to establish a legal custodial relationship between the parties, with physical custody vested in K.S.; 2) to establish a parenting time … However, plaintiffs were clearly committed to the child’s being exposed to early education as much as possible.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJennifer Dasilva v. Renaissance Terrace
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 2026
The court found defendant established the validity of the release. … Further, "any contractual waiver of rights . . . must reflect that the parties have clearly and unambiguously agreed to those terms. . . .
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Meliton Alvarez
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2025
"[A]n offense is considered a lesser-included offense 'where the proof required to establish a greater offense is also sufficient to establish every element of a lesser offense' and 'where two offenses are the same but … a lesser degree of culpability is required to establish the lesser offense.'"
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLEE C. HUGUENIN VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 2017
Established 20 base weeks as defined at N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(t)(3) as an amount equal to 20 times the State minimum hourly wage; 2. … function to rewrite a 5 A-3826-15T1 plainly written statute or to presume that the Legislature meant something other than what it conveyed in its clearly
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMES WOETZEL (15-05-0385, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 28, 2020
Robert Pandina, who was qualified as an expert in psychopharmacology. … Here, the pre-sentence report similarly established that defendant earned a bachelor's degree and, prior to incarceration, had been employed for fourteen years as a landscape architect.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished376 N.J. Super. 451 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 2005
The State claims R.B. qualifies as “any person,” and his conduct resulting in his conviction for count three of the federal indictment constituted abuse and cruelty of the two seventeen-year-old boys, satisfying the criminal … As long as an overlapping criminal provision “clearly define[s] the conduct prohibited and the punishment authorized, the notice requirements of the Due Process Clause are satisfied.” United States v.
Overruled in part, on other grounds by In re T.T., 188 N.J. 321 (2006)Cited 13 timesPublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. CHAYIM GOODMAN (16-21, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 2, 2019
A-5683-16T4 3 The chief testified, however, that despite his volunteer work defendant "was not granted any special privileges or immunities." … Reversal is justified only if the courts' decisions are clearly mistaken "and so plainly unwarranted that the interests of justice demand intervention and correction."
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2019
The testifying expert may not parrot another's opinion and "the testimony must be provided by a truly independent and qualified reviewer of the underlying data and report . . . ." Id. at 79. … Defendant contends the offenses in Counts One through Four were established by the same or less facts required to establish the commission of a crime in Count Five and therefore should have been merged into Count Five.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.
120 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 1972
Romain, supra, at pp. 557-558: The Legislature, by N.J.S.A. 56:8-8, clearly empowered the Attorney General to police consumer practices and contracts. … Hence, the fact that Koscot is a corporate entity does not immunize Turner from being held to account for Consumer Fraud Act violations committed on his behalf.
Cited 66 timesPublishedCarol Jackson v. Rutgers University
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 2025
To establish a prima facie case based on discriminatory discharge, the plaintiff must demonstrate: "(1) that plaintiff is in a protected class; (2) that plaintiff was otherwise qualified and performing the essential functions … Plaintiff argues she established a prima facie case of discrimination because she: (1) is a member of a protected group based on her African American race and her age of sixty-five; (2) was qualified for the position
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. VICTOR MUGLIA (08-11-0949, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 2018
The court issued a written opinion, in which it observed defendant never submitted a report from a qualified expert establishing defendant suffered from a mental defect that: (1) interfered with his ability to knowingly … None of his claims is tethered to a qualified expert’s opinion that establishes that he (1) had a mental disease or defect at the time of the offense that hindered his cognitive ability to prevent or interfere with the
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState of New Jersey v. Lashawn Fitch
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 2025
Carter, our Supreme Court identified a three-prong test to determine when evidence is newly discovered and sufficient to warrant the grant of a new trial: [T]o qualify as newly discovered evidence entitling … Contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude defendant failed to establish a Brady violation.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 19, 2022
Div. 2021) (holding trial court had substantial credible evidence to conclude the Division established all four prongs of the Title 30 termination criteria). … Evidence that establishes a resource parent's clear and informed preference for adoption the language of prong two . . . the legislature required treating KLG as a viable permanency option, eliminating qualifying language
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSTATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RUSSELL E. OLEXA (19-07-1833, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 2022
However, defendant did not qualify because he failed to establish the second criteria since he was not licensed to carry a gun in Pennsylvania. … The trial court noted it could only allow defendant into PTI over the State's objection if defendant "clearly and convincingly establishes that the prosecutor's review of the admission to the program was based on a patently
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNew Jersey Citizen Action v. Philip D. Murphy
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 2024
The new law exempted non-profit hospitals from property taxation, and instead established a community service requirement. … As we have discussed, plaintiffs did not establish the amended statute was unconstitutional.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna