Case law

De Marco v. BD., CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, BERGEN CTY.

36 N.J. Super. 382 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1955

Duncan v. Board of Fire, etc., Commissioners, 131 N.J.L. 443 ( Sup. Ct. 1944). … . & A. 1929); Hillel v. Borough of Edgewater, 106 N.J.L. 481 ( E. & A. 1929); Board of Education, Cedar Grove v. State Board of Education, 115 N.J.L. 67 ( Sup. Ct. 1935); Sheridan v. McCurnin, 124 N.J.L. 493 ( Sup.

Earneka Wiggins v. Hackensack Meridian Health

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 18, 2024

Est. of Pfannenstein v. Surrey, 475 N.J. Super. 83, 90-91 (App. … Bandler v. Melillo, 443 N.J. Super. 203, 209-11 (App. Div. 2015).

State v. Cooper

410 N.J. Super. 43 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 3, 2009

See, e.g., United States v. … She pointed out that defendant only exhibited a "primitive" attempt to conceal his crime by boarding the porch back up, thereby demonstrating behavior indicative of FAS.

Michelson v. Wyatt

379 N.J. Super. 611 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 2005

Ass'n v. Thompson, 327 F. 3d 346, 353-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 981 , 124 S.Ct. 464 , 157 L.Ed. 2d 371 (2003). Accord Smith v. Am. Home Prods. Corp. … The opinion in Board of Education of Newark is instructive. In that case, the Newark Board of Education sought information on medical claims paid by the Plan on behalf of Board of Education employees.

Hull v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.

202 N.J. Super. 461 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1985

Subsequent to trial, the Supreme Court opinions in Soler, supra and Brown v. … On the evidence in the record we do not apply the foregoing principle of Soler and Brown .

In re Prudential Insurance

282 N.J. Super. 256 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 1995

Siegman v. … Dozier, 96 N.J.Eq. 46, 124 A 319 (Ch. 1924) (demand futile where board of directors had approved wrongdoing); Holub v.

Teaneck Bd. of Ed. v. Teaneck Teachers Ass'n

185 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 28, 1982

Super. 269 (1982) 448 A.2d 487 TEANECK BOARD OF EDUCATION, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TEANECK TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 8, 1982. … The Teaneck Board of Education (Board) contends that the grievance pertains to a subject matter outside the legal scope of negotiations, and hence was not arbitrable.

NJ Ass'n of Health Care Facil. v. Klein

182 N.J. Super. 252 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1981

The result we reach here is supported by State v. … See Wilson v. Mountainside, 42 N.J. 426, 442 (1964).

Universal N. Am. Ins. Co. v. Bridgepointe Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

456 N.J. Super. 480 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 2018

In this regard, every condominium association owes a fiduciary duty to its condominium unit owners, "comparable to the obligation that a board of directors of a corporation owes its stockholders." Thanasoulis v. … Co. v.

Elon Associates, L.L.C. v. Township of Howell

370 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2004

In Sod Farm, Assocs. v. … Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

Magaw v. Middletown Bd. of Educ.

323 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1999

Super. 1 Donald MAGAW, Petitioner-Respondent, v. MIDDLETOWN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 16, 1999. Decided July 2, 1999. *1198 John H. … Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean, 295 N.J.Super. 390 , 685 A. 2d 68 (App.Div.1996), certif. granted, 149 N.J. 141 , 693 A. 2d 110 (1997); Forgash v.

Cobbs. v. City of Cape Mays.

113 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1971

City Affairs Committee of Jersey City v. … Errington v. Mansfield Township Board of Education, 81 N.J. Super. 414 (App. Div. 1963), 42 N.J. 320 (1964) *604 and 100 N.J. Super. 130 (App. Div. 1968) is not to the contrary.

Yellow Cab Corp. v. City Coun., Passaic

124 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1973

[Citation omitted]. [ Abelson's Inc. v. N.J. State Board of Optometrists, 5 N.J. 412, 420 (1950); Consolidation Coal Co. v. Kandle, supra.] … In Laba v.

Parastu Sharifi v. Township of East Windsor

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 28, 2024

Plaintiff appealed the Board's memorandum of judgment. … A-1813-22 5  We apply "a highly deferential standard of review" to decisions of a Tax Court, Brown v. Borough of Glen Rock, 19 N.J. Tax 366, 375 (App.

Houman v. Mayor & Coun. Bor. Pompton Lakes

155 N.J. Super. 129 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 12, 1977

Ruehl Co. v. Board of Trustees of Schools for Indust. Ed., 85 N.J. Super. 4 (Law Div. 1964); State v. Link, 14 N.J. 446 (1954). … In Jones v. East Windsor Regional Bd. of Ed., 143 N.J. Super. 182 (Law Div. 1976), the board did notify the newspapers as required by the statute.

Brenner and Co. v. Perl

72 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 2, 1962

Breen v. Levine, 32 N.J. Super. 525 ( App. Div. 1954); Schwartz v. … Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Rice, 4 N.J. 169, 180 (1950); Sustick v. Slatina, 48 N.J. Super. 134 ( App. Div. 1957); McCue v. Deppert, 21 N.J. Super. 591, 595 ( App. Div. 1952); Louis Kamm, Inc. v.

Brockwell Contract v. Kearny Bd.

420 N.J. Super. 273 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 2011

Super. 273 BROCKWELL & CARRINGTON CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KEARNY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Hall Construction, Inc., Defendants-Respondents, and Dobco, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. … He relied primarily on the EFCFA and our holding in Advance Electric Co. v.

Economic Dev. v. Pavonia Resturant

319 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 4, 1998

I consulted with our director of finance, [Eugene Bukowski], and ultimately the project was presented to our board where we determined that the projections that were submitted by the applicant were reasonable. … See Morris v.

Golaine v. Cardinale

142 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1976

. & A. 1918); McCran v. Gaul, 95 N. J. L. 393, 400-402 (Sup. Ct. 1920); Shockley v. Hamilton Tp., 98 N. J. L. 614 (Sup. Ct. 1923); Tonkin v. Kenworthy, 112 N. J. L. 274, 279 (Sup. Ct. 1933); Pillsbury v. Monmouth Cty. … And see also, generally, Kobylarz v. Mercer, 130 N. J. L. 44 (E. & A. 1942); Gavio v. Lavallette, 10 N. J. Misc. 742, 161 A. 42 *397 (Sup. Ct. 1932); Bredin v. Rosma, 81 N. J. L. 307 (Sup. Ct. 1911); McAleer v.

In Re Court Reorganization Plan of Hudson County

161 N.J. Super. 483 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1978

Weinstein v. St. Louis Cty., 451 S.W. 2d 99 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 1970); Judges for Third Judic. Cir. v. Wayne Cty., 386 Mich. 1 , 190 N.W. 2d 228 (Sup. Ct. 1971); Leahey v. Farrell, 362 Pa. 52 , 66 A. 2d 577 (Sup. … Probation Officers' Ass'n v.