Case law

Smith v. Hudson County Register

411 N.J. Super. 538 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 2010

Builders Ass'n v. … See Dugan v.

Burton v. NJ DEP'T OF INSTITUTIONS & AGENCIES

147 N.J. Super. 124 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 4, 1977

Super. 124 (1977) 370 A.2d 878 GEORGE BURTON, APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC WELFARE, AND THE PASSAIC COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, RESPONDENTS. … The Division relies on Gonzalez v.

In Re Klayman

97 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 16, 1967

It is concluded, therefore, that the "write-in" votes which do not bear a checkmark or office or party designation are not invalidated when a voting machine is used. *304 II Relying on Weeks v. Kip, 64 N.J.L. 61 ( Sup. … (at p. 595) And in Wene v.

NJ Ass'n of Health Care Facil. v. Klein

182 N.J. Super. 252 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1981

The result we reach here is supported by State v. … See Wilson v. Mountainside, 42 N.J. 426, 442 (1964).

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of Closter

190 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1983

The issue in this court was whether the assessment could be increased above the original level when the taxing district had not raised the issue before the county board. The tax court found that Bor. of Matawan v. … Diament v. Fort Lee, 3 N.J.

Universal N. Am. Ins. Co. v. Bridgepointe Condo. Ass'n, Inc.

456 N.J. Super. 480 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 13, 2018

In this regard, every condominium association owes a fiduciary duty to its condominium unit owners, "comparable to the obligation that a board of directors of a corporation owes its stockholders." Thanasoulis v. … Co. v.

O'Neill v. State

178 N.J. Super. 211 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 7, 1981

Slurzberg v. Bayonne, 29 N.J. 106, 115 (1959). See 405 Monroe Co. v. … Snedeker v. Board of Review, 139 N.J.Super. 394, 403 (App.Div.1976). There is a rational basis for the distinction in the provision under attack.

Magaw v. Middletown Bd. of Educ.

323 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1999

Super. 1 Donald MAGAW, Petitioner-Respondent, v. MIDDLETOWN BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued June 16, 1999. Decided July 2, 1999. *1198 John H. … Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean, 295 N.J.Super. 390 , 685 A. 2d 68 (App.Div.1996), certif. granted, 149 N.J. 141 , 693 A. 2d 110 (1997); Forgash v.

In re New Jersey Natural Gas Co.

109 N.J. Super. 324 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 26, 1970

In Lewandoski v. Brookwood Musconetcong River, etc., Ass’n, 37 N. J. 433 (1962), the Supreme Court reviewed a Board determination that a particular water distribution system was a public utility. … Acquacka *333 nonk Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 97 N. J. L. 366, 370-371 (Sup. Ct. 1922), aff’d sub nom. East Jersey Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commis sioners, 98 N. J.

In Re Court Reorganization Plan of Hudson County

161 N.J. Super. 483 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1978

Weinstein v. St. Louis Cty., 451 S.W. 2d 99 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 1970); Judges for Third Judic. Cir. v. Wayne Cty., 386 Mich. 1 , 190 N.W. 2d 228 (Sup. Ct. 1971); Leahey v. Farrell, 362 Pa. 52 , 66 A. 2d 577 (Sup. … Probation Officers' Ass'n v.

Jersey City Incin. Auth. v. Dept. of Pub. Util.

146 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1976

Tp. v. … Miller v. Hudson Cty. Bd. of Freeholders, 10 N.J. 398, 413 (1952); Barringer v. Miele, 6 N.J. 139, 144 (1951); State v. Moresh, 122 N.J.L. 77, 79 (E. & A. 1939); cf. Closter Service Stations, Inc. v.

Cemetery Workers v. ROM. CATH. DIOCESE NEWARK

127 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1974

The federal cases involving review of N.L.R.B. decisions recognize that in determining appropriate bargaining units "a wide discretion has been vested in the Board," N.L.R.B. v. … Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., supra — the Board improperly allowed the extent of the employees organization to be controlling. Cf. N.L.R.B. v.

Russo v. NJ Dept. of Corrections

324 N.J. Super. 576 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 28, 1999

See, e.g., Meeks v. McBride, 81 F. 3d at 722 ; United States v. Brown, 59 F. 3d 102 , 103-04 (9th Cir.1995); Garrity v. … See Brady v. Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210-11 , 704 A. 2d 547 (1997); George Harms Const. Co., Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Auth., 137 N.J. 8, 27 , 644 A. 2d 76 (1994); Henry v.

County of Essex v. Hindenlang

35 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 20, 1955

Henninger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen, 2 N.J. Super. 1 ( App. Div. 1949), affirmed 3 N.J. 68 (1949), involving R.S. 40:32-3. … Krause v. Peoria Housing Authority, 370 Ill. 356 , 19 N.E. 2 d 193 ( Sup. Ct. 1939); Spahn v. Stewart, 268 Ky. 97 , 103 S.W. 2 d 651 ( Ct. App. 1937); Kansas City v.

Basf Corp. Coating & Ink Division v. Town of Belvidere

24 N.J. Tax 416 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 16, 2009

Coating & Ink Div. v. Town of Belvidere, 22 N.J.Tax 550 (2005). … In Tri-Terminal Corp. v.

Eherenstorfer v. Div. of Public Welfare

196 N.J. Super. 405 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 12, 1984

See Roberts v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 82 (1979); New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Brower, 161 N.J. Super. 293, 298-299 (App.Div. 1978). … See King v.

In Re Application of Mahoney

17 N.J. Super. 99 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1951

State Board of Administration v. Jones, 212 Ala. 380 , 102 So. 626 ( Sup. Ct. Ala. 1924); Biddle v. C.I.R., 86 Fed. 2 d 718 ( C.C.A. 2, 1936), affirmed 302 U.S. 573 , 58 S.Ct. 379 , 82 L.Ed. 431 ( U.S. Sup. Ct. 1938). … DeSanto v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 17 N.J. Super. 44 ( App. Div. 1951).

In the Matter of the Competitive Solar Incentive

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 23, 2024

Auth. v. Donovan, 226 N.J. 432, 443-44 (2016). "[T]he best indicator of that intent is the statutory language." DiProspero v. Penn, 183 N.J. 477, 492 (2005). … A-2232-22 11 State v. Burnham, 474 N.J. Super. 226, 231 (App. Div. 2022) (citing Zabilowicz v. Kelsey, 200 N.J. 507, 517 (2009)).

Starkey v. State

183 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 13, 1982

Swan v. Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund, 85 N.J.Super. 226, 231 (App.Div.1964). … In Alessi v.

McChesney v. McChesney

91 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1966

Presumably, the Legislature therein used the word "divorce" with intent when designating causes for divorce from the bond of matrimony and causes for divorce from bed and board. See Koch v. Koch, 79 N.J. … Schluter v. Schluter, 23 N.J. Super. 409 ( App. Div. 1952).