Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.70s

  • City of Newark v. (497) BLOCK 1854

    244 N.J. Super. 402 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 2011

    Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams , Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co ., and Township of Montville v. … Kazin v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Malhame v. Borough of Demarest

    162 N.J. Super. 248 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 3, 1978

    But in Gilmour v. Green Village Fire Dep't, 2 N.J. Super. 393 (Ch. … The leading case, and the one most often cited, is Benton v. Kernan, 130 N.J.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gamba v. Township of Brick

    395 N.J. Super. 143 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 2007

    Hepner v. Twp. Comm. of Twp. of Lawrence, 115 N.J.Super. 155, 161-62 , 278 A. 2d 513 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 59 N.J. 270 , 281 A. 2d 532 (1971); accord 21-23 Seidler Assocs., L.L.C. v. … See H.E.S. v. J.C.S., 175 N.J. 309, 321-25 , 815 A. 2d 405 (2003). The Board was not free to ignore the Legislature's determination that a minimum of seven days is required for adequate preparation of a defense.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DL v. Bd. of Educ. of Princeton

    366 N.J. Super. 269 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 2004

    Super. 269 D.L. and Z.Y. on Behalf of Minor children T.L. and K.L., Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCETON REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent-Respondent. … Our scope of review is limited to a determination of whether the Board's decision is "unreasonable, unsupported by the record or violative of the legislative will." Capodilupo v. Bd. of Ed. of W.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Antonelli v. Planning Bd. of Waldwick

    77 N.J. Super. 119 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 31, 1962

    AMSTER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF WALDWICK, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Argued October 19, 1962. Decided October 31, 1962. *121 Mr. … In Newman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re the Denial of Private Detective License of Hackett

    190 N.J. Super. 300 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1983

    In Fay v. … See, e.g., Matthews v. Florida, 463 F.2d 679, 681 (5 Cir.1972); Brown v. Resor, 407 F.2d 281 (5 Cir.1969), cert. den. 399 U.S. 933 , 90 S.Ct. 2249 , 26 L.Ed.2d 806 (1970); Nix v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Blume v. Denville Tp. Bd. of Educ.

    334 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 31, 2000

    Greenberg v. … O'Connor v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Buford

    132 N.J. Super. 209 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1975

    As pointed out in Myers v. Cedar Grove Tp., 36 N. … Como Farms, Inc. v. Foran, 6 N. J. Super. 306, 311 (App. Div. 1950); and see, Clark v. Elizabeth, 61 N. J. L. 565, 581 (E. & A. 1898); Fagan v. Hoboken, 85 N. J. L. 297, 299 (E. & A. 1913).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Woodcock v. Calabrese

    148 N.J. Super. 526 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 1977

    Abrams v. Civil Service Dept., 70 N.J. Super. 559, 563 (App. Div. 1961). See also, O'Rourke v. Board of Review, 24 N.J. 607, 610-611 (1957), and State v. Canola, 135 N.J. Super. 224, 235 (App. Div. 1975). … See State in Interest of N.L., 69 N.J. 342 , 346-347 (1976) and State v. Hanly, 127 N.J. Super. 436, 445 (App. Div. 1974). Cf. State v. Savoie, 67 N.J. 439, 454-461 (1975), and Penna. R.R. Co. v. N.J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pingry Corp. v. Hillside Tp.

    86 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 11, 1965

    State Board, 102 N.J.L. 525 ( Sup. Ct. 1926), affirmed per curiam 104 *442 N.J.L. 165 ( E. & A. 1927), and Dwight School of Englewood v. State Board Tax Appeals, 114 N.J.L. 594 ( Sup. … Note, Mayor, &c., etc., of Princeton v. State Board of Taxes and Assessments, 96 N.J.L. 334 ( Sup. Ct. 1921); Princeton [ Country Day ] School v. State Board, 113 N.J.L. 515, 519 ( Sup. Ct. 1934).

    Reversed on other grounds by Pingry Corp. v. Township of Hillside, 46 N.J. 457 (1966)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • NEWARK, CREAM CO. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Twp.

    47 N.J. Super. 306 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 1957

    Berdan v. City of Paterson, 1 N.J. 199, 205 (1948); Kozesnik v. Township of Montgomery, 24 N.J. 154 (1957). … Justice Weintraub in Kozesnik v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. $36,560.00 in U.S. Currency

    289 N.J. Super. 237 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1996

    State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 597 , 404 A.2d 1111 (1979); State v. Reed, 34 N.J. 554, 557 , 170 A.2d 419 (1961). Possession may be either actual or constructive. N.J.S.A. 2C:35-10a. … State v. Brown, supra, 80 N.J. at 590-91 , 404 A.2d 1111 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Yates v. FRANKLIN TP. BD. OF ADJ.

    112 N.J. Super. 156 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 18, 1970

    On October 16, 1969, the defendant Board of Adjustment adopted a resolution recommending the aforesaid variance. … See also Savonick v. Lawrence Tp., 91 N.J. Super. 288, 294 (Law Div. 1966). *159 It is elementary that there is a definite need for fire protection in every municipality within this State.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Edison Tp. Bd. of Ed.

    137 N.J. Super. 566 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 16, 1975

    Theobold v. Angelos, 40 N.J. 295, 304 (1963). … Bass v. Allen Home Improvement Co., 8 N.J. 219, 226 (1951); Reale v. Wayne Tp., 132 N.J. Super. 100, 115 (Law Div. 1975).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Levin-Sagner-Orange v. RENT LEVELING BD., ORANGE

    147 N.J. Super. 303 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1977

    Super. 303 (1977) 371 A.2d 302 LEVIN-SAGNER-ORANGE AND LEVIN-SAGNER-HOMES URBAN RENEWAL SECTION II, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. … REYNOLDS TERRACE, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RENT LEVELING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ORANGE AND BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Waterfront Dev. Permit

    244 N.J. Super. 426 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 13, 1990

    In United States v. … (quoting Hudson Bergen, etc., Ass'n v. Board of Com'rs of City of Hoboken, 135 N.J.L. 502, 510 , 52 A. 2d 668 (E. & A. 1947) (other citations omitted)).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Klotz v. BD. OF ADJUST. OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS

    90 N.J. Super. 295 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1966

    Super. 295 (1966) 217 A.2d 168 HAROLD KLOTZ, PLAINTIFF, v. … Frizen v. Poppy, 17 N.J. Super. 390 ( Ch. Div. 1952); Giordano v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Dumont, 137 N.J.L. 740 ( E. & A. 1948).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Angiola v. Bd. of Trustees

    359 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 11, 2003

    See Maynard v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169, 172-73 , 549 A. 2d 1213 (1988); Cattani v. … Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System, 69 N.J. 578, 583-84 , 355 A. 2d 625 (1976) and Russo v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. Bd. of Ed. of Irvington

    29 N.J. Super. 232 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1953

    MATTHEWS, PLAINTIFF, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWN OF IRVINGTON, COUNTY OF ESSEX, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. Decided December 30, 1953. Messrs. Ruhlman & Ruhlman ( Mr. Cassel R. … This is done for the board's protection so it will have in advance full knowledge of its teacher complement for the succeeding school year.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Crescent Park Associates

    208 N.J. Super. 27 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1986

    Relying upon Parsippany Hills Assoc. v. … Parsippany Hills Assoc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.