Case law

Private Truck Council of Am., Inc. v. State

221 N.J. Super. 89 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1987

Brown & Connery and Kohn, Savett, Marion & Graf admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellants in A-1559-85T1 ( Merle A. Wolfson and Joseph M. Yohlin, of counsel; Steven G. Wolschina and David H. … Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 , 13 L.Ed 996 (1852), it has been clear that "the Commerce Clause was not merely an authorization to Congress to enact laws for the protection and encouragement of commerce among the States,

State v. Whyte

265 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1992

State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 597 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979). Our careful review of this record satisfies us that the State's proofs were insufficient to warrant a constructive possession finding beyond a reasonable doubt. … See State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 593 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979); State v. Sapp, 71 N.J. 476 , 366 A. 2d 334 (1976), rev'g on dissent, 144 N.J. Super. 455, 460 , 366 A. 2d 335 (App.Div. 1975).

Piscataway Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. Caffiero

173 N.J. Super. 204 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 1, 1980

Super. 204 (1980) 413 A.2d 981 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP, A PUBLIC BODY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MR. JOSEPH CAFFIERO, MRS. JOSEPH CAFFIERO, HIS WIFE, JAY CAFFIERO, MR. … BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF ROSELLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TULIO MONAGAS, "JANE" MONAGAS, (FIRST NAME BEING FICTITIOUS) AND ANGEL MONAGAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Flynn v. Union City

32 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1954

DeLorenzo v. Board of Commissioners, 134 N.J.L. 7 ." … Doremus v. Board of Education of Hawthorne, 5 N.J. 435, 452 (1950). The judgment is affirmed.

Estate of Dolente v. Borough of Pine Hill

313 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1998

Thus, in Witt v. … Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Dept. of Transp., 116 N.J. 543, 561 , 562 A.2d 222 (1989).

Matter of Sheriff's Officer (Pc2209j)

226 N.J. Super. 17 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1988

Board of Educa., Plainfield v. Cooperman, 209 N.J. Super. 174, 204 (App.Div. 1986), mod. on other grounds 105 N.J. 587 (1987). As we learn *22 from Metromedia, Inc. v. … Woodland Private Study Group v. State, 109 N.J. at 75 .

Shaw v. Byram Tp.

86 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1965

Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp., 120 N.J.L. 463 ( Sup. Ct. 1938); Township of Dover v. *603 Witt, 7 N.J. Super. 259 ( App. Div. 1950); State v. Wittenberg, 50 N.J. Super. 74 ( App. … The amendment herein is presumptively valid and a proper exercise of the local board's authority.

Reiser v. Pension Commission of the Employees Retirement System

147 N.J. Super. 168 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 7, 1976

However, in Alexander Hamilton Hotel Corp. v. Board of Review, 127 N. J. L. 184 (Sup. … Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U. S. 390 , 43 S. Ct. 625 , 67 L. Ed. 1042 (1923). In Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U. S. 599 , 81 S. Ct. 1144 , 6 L.

Mason v. City of Paterson

120 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1972

Its unique quality was recognized in Fielding v. Board of Ed., Paterson, 76 N. J. Super. 50—57 (Ch. … Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders, 30 N. J. 381, 389 (1959); Scott v. Bloomfield, 94 N. J. Super. 592, 598 (Law Div. 1967), aff’d 98 N. J. Super. 321 (App. Div. 1967).

Elon Associates, L.L.C. v. Township of Howell

370 N.J. Super. 475 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 2004

In Sod Farm, Assocs. v. … Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

Glenwood Realty Co., Inc. v. City of East Orange

78 N.J. Super. 67 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 1963

The taxpayer alleged discrimination on its appeal to the County Board of Taxation. After a hearing, the board reduced the assessment on the building to $620,700. … As stated in Switz v.

Jerabek v. State

69 N.J. Super. 264 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 6, 1961

State v. Compton, 28 N.J. Super. 45 ( App. Div. 1953). … State v. Terry, 38 N.J. Super. 31, 32 ( App. Div. 1955). We do not pass upon the question of whether the Board was required to advise the appellant of his right to counsel or to assign counsel to him if he so desired.

Monmouth Medical Center v. State Department of Health

272 N.J. Super. 297 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1994

See Fairlawn Shopper, Inc. v. … Corp. v.

Centex Homes, LLC v. Township Committee

372 N.J. Super. 186 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 4, 2004

The Township summarizes its arguments essentially in the following heading in its brief: V. … El Shaer v. Planning Bd., 249 N.J.Super. 323 , 592 A.2d 565 (App.Div.1991), certif. denied 127 N.J. 546 , 606 A.2d 360 (1992); Urban v.

General Electric Co. v. City of Passaic

48 N.J. Super. 604 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 1958

Hahne Realty Corp. v. City of Newark, 119 N. J. L. 12 (E. & A. 1937). … Rice v. City of Newark, 136 N. J. Eq. 53 (Ch. 1944).

MARCELLA SIMADIRIS VS. PATERSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT (L-1674-19, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2021

The district relies on a published trial court decision, Cirangle v. Maywood Board of Education, 164 N.J. … DiProspero v. Penn, 183 N.J. 477, 492 (2005); Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc., 197 N.J. 543, 553 (2009).

Frank v. Luther

18 N.J. Super. 193 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 4, 1952

See DeVito v. Pearsall, 115 N.J.L. 323 ( Sup. Ct. 1935); Pieretti v. Johnson, 132 N.J.L. 576 ( Sup. Ct. 1945); Green v. Board of Commissioners of Newark, 131 N.J.L. 336 ( Sup. Ct. 1944); Meixner v. … Lumund v. Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Rutherford, 4 N.J. 577, 585 (1950). In Lane v.

State v. Goetaski

209 N.J. Super. 362 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 18, 1986

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 357 (1979). … We conclude that the stop of defendant in this case was not arbitrary, random and wholly without justification in the individual circumstance, in contrast to the unconstitutional stops in cases like Brown v.

Tedesco v. Montclair Township

21 N.J. Tax 95 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 10, 2003

By supplemental letter opinion the court corrected its error and entered an amended judgment affirming the county board assessment. See Ford Motor Co. v. … county board.

Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil Service

57 N.J. Super. 13 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 1959

See Blore v. Board of Freeholders of Union County, 64 N.J.L. 262 ( E. & A. 1900), so describing the Erwin case and its forerunner, Stuhr v. Curran, 44 N.J.L. 181 ( E. & A. 1882). … In Beattie v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 96 N.J.L. 72 ( Sup. Ct. 1921), the prosecutor in certiorari had been appointed secretary of the county board of taxation for a one-year term, to expire April 30, 1920.