Case law

Circus Liquors, Inc. v. GOVERNING BODY OF MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP

398 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 2008

In 2005, the Township Committee of the Township of Middletown, acting as the local Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (Middletown), considered applications for the annual renewal of three liquor licenses: XXXX-XX-XXX-XXX and … See Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Maynards, Inc., 192 N.J. 158, 183-84 , 927 A. 2d 525 (2007); R & R Marketing, L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175-76 , 729 A. 2d 1 (1999).

Dugan v. Stockton State College

245 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 5, 1991

Once the statutory prerequisites have been met, there is no further participation by the board of trustees. As the Supreme Court pointed out in Assoc. of State Col. Fac. v. … Civil Service Ass'n v. State, 88 N.J. 605, 611 , 443 A. 2d 1070 (1982). The decision of the State Board of Higher Education is reversed.

Tobon v. Sanchez

213 N.J. Super. 472 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1986

Williams v. Witt 98 N.J. Super. 1 (App.Div. 1967). … In Brown v. Brown, 34 N.J. Super. 261 (Ch.Div. 1954), on the facts, the availability of several different inferences precluded plaintiff from establishing her right to an annulment by clear and convincing evidence.

City of Wildwood v. DEMARZO

412 N.J. Super. 105 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 2010

See Eggers v. … Dunn v.

Rosenberg v. Otis Elevator Co.

366 N.J. Super. 292 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 29, 2004

According to Mason, replacement of the printed circuit board solved the problem as the circuit board drives the relay. Mason was unable to recall whether any circuit boards had previously failed. … LAW OF THE CASE In Myrlak v.

Trinity Cemetery Ass'n v. Township of Wall

325 N.J. Super. 292 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1999

[Cedar Park Cemetery v. Hayes, 132 N.J.Super. 572 , 334 A.2d 386 (Law Div.1975); Diocese of Metuchen v. Township of Piscataway, 252 N.J.Super. 525 , 600 A.2d 173 (Law Div.1991); Laurel Lawn v. … Plaza Joint Venture v. City of Atlantic City, 174 N.J.Super. 231, 238 , 416 A.2d 71 (App.Div.1980). “The approach to the state preemption issue parallels the federal analysis.” Garden State Farms, Inc. v.

Shaw v. Byram Tp.

86 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1965

Earruso v. Board of Health, E. Hanover Twp., 120 N.J.L. 463 ( Sup. Ct. 1938); Township of Dover v. *603 Witt, 7 N.J. Super. 259 ( App. Div. 1950); State v. Wittenberg, 50 N.J. Super. 74 ( App. … The amendment herein is presumptively valid and a proper exercise of the local board's authority.

Village of Loch Arbour v. Ocean Tp.

55 N.J. Super. 250 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1959

See Crisci v. Board of Commissioners of Raritan, 119 N.J.L. 103 ( Sup. Ct. 1937); Bridgewater Tp. v. Local Government Board, 137 N.J.L. 416 ( Sup. … Ct. 1854); Broking v. Van Valen, 56 N.J.L. 85 ( Sup. Ct. 1893); State ( Pancoast, *258 prosecutrix ) v. Troth, 34 N.J.L. 377 ( Sup. Ct. 1871); and cf. Grosso v. City of Paterson, 55 N.J.

Sherry v. Buonansonti

287 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1996

Brown argued the cause for respondent ( Drazin & Warshaw, attorneys; Mr. Brown, on the brief). The opinion of the court was delivered by KIMMELMAN, J.A.D. (temporarily assigned). … In Cavanaugh v. Morris, 273 N.J.

Cobbs. v. City of Cape Mays.

113 N.J. Super. 598 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 8, 1971

City Affairs Committee of Jersey City v. … Errington v. Mansfield Township Board of Education, 81 N.J. Super. 414 (App. Div. 1963), 42 N.J. 320 (1964) *604 and 100 N.J. Super. 130 (App. Div. 1968) is not to the contrary.

In Re PSE & G Shareholder Lit.

315 N.J. Super. 323 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 1998

Addison, 20 F. 3d 398 , 402 (11th Cir.1994); Spiegel v. Buntrock, 571 A. 2d 767, 775 (Del. 1990). "A board's refusal is only wrongful if it is not a valid exercise of its business judgment." Maul v. … Levine v. Smith, 591 A. 2d 194 (Del.1991). Where a shareholder makes a demand on the board to commence litigation, that shareholder "tacitly concedes the independence of a majority of the board to respond.

Moriarty v. Pozner

36 N.J. Super. 586 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 15, 1955

Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Township, 9 N.J. 64 (1952); Ward v. Scott, 11 N.J. 117 (1952); Ward v. Scott, 16 N.J. 16 (1954); Dolan v. DeCapua, 16 N.J. 599 (1954). … Ward v. Scott, supra (11 N.J., at pages 125, 126); Ward v. Scott, supra (16 N.J., at pages 21, 22); cf. Skaf v. Zoning Board, etc., of Asbury Park, 35 N.J. Super. 215, 222 ( App. Div. 1955); Izenberg v.

Golaine v. Cardinale

142 N.J. Super. 385 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 18, 1976

. & A. 1918); McCran v. Gaul, 95 N. J. L. 393, 400-402 (Sup. Ct. 1920); Shockley v. Hamilton Tp., 98 N. J. L. 614 (Sup. Ct. 1923); Tonkin v. Kenworthy, 112 N. J. L. 274, 279 (Sup. Ct. 1933); Pillsbury v. Monmouth Cty. … And see also, generally, Kobylarz v. Mercer, 130 N. J. L. 44 (E. & A. 1942); Gavio v. Lavallette, 10 N. J. Misc. 742, 161 A. 42 *397 (Sup. Ct. 1932); Bredin v. Rosma, 81 N. J. L. 307 (Sup. Ct. 1911); McAleer v.

Private Truck Council of Am., Inc. v. State

221 N.J. Super. 89 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 31, 1987

Brown & Connery and Kohn, Savett, Marion & Graf admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for appellants in A-1559-85T1 ( Merle A. Wolfson and Joseph M. Yohlin, of counsel; Steven G. Wolschina and David H. … Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299 , 13 L.Ed 996 (1852), it has been clear that "the Commerce Clause was not merely an authorization to Congress to enact laws for the protection and encouragement of commerce among the States,

State v. Whyte

265 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 24, 1992

State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 597 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979). Our careful review of this record satisfies us that the State's proofs were insufficient to warrant a constructive possession finding beyond a reasonable doubt. … See State v. Brown, 80 N.J. 587, 593 , 404 A. 2d 1111 (1979); State v. Sapp, 71 N.J. 476 , 366 A. 2d 334 (1976), rev'g on dissent, 144 N.J. Super. 455, 460 , 366 A. 2d 335 (App.Div. 1975).

Flynn v. Union City

32 N.J. Super. 518 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 15, 1954

DeLorenzo v. Board of Commissioners, 134 N.J.L. 7 ." … Doremus v. Board of Education of Hawthorne, 5 N.J. 435, 452 (1950). The judgment is affirmed.

Estate of Dolente v. Borough of Pine Hill

313 N.J. Super. 410 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 30, 1998

Thus, in Witt v. … Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Dept. of Transp., 116 N.J. 543, 561 , 562 A.2d 222 (1989).

Matter of Sheriff's Officer (Pc2209j)

226 N.J. Super. 17 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 1988

Board of Educa., Plainfield v. Cooperman, 209 N.J. Super. 174, 204 (App.Div. 1986), mod. on other grounds 105 N.J. 587 (1987). As we learn *22 from Metromedia, Inc. v. … Woodland Private Study Group v. State, 109 N.J. at 75 .

Lacey v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hamilton

4 N.J. Super. 422 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 26, 1949

No witnesses were sworn, but the Board made an inspection of the leased premises (see Giordano v. … See Ramsbotham v. Board of Public Works, supra.

Boots'n Saddle v. Newark Municipal Bd., ABC

44 N.J. Super. 38 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 1957

Super. 38 (1957) 129 A.2d 583 BOOTS 'N SADDLE, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. … Co. v.