Case law

GLENN CIRIPOMPA VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF BOUND BROOK, SOMERSET COUNTY (NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 2021

Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J. 453, 460 (App. Div. 1982). The Board's fear that plaintiff will be made "more than whole" if the Board does not deduct the unemployment benefits is baseless. … The Board's reliance on City of Newark v. Copeland, 171 N.J. Super. 571 (App. Div. 1980), and Willis v. Dyer, 163 N.J. Super. 152 (App.

In Re Micro-Cable Communications Corp.

176 N.J. Super. 197 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 5, 1980

Degnan, Attorney General, for respondent Board of Public Utilities ( Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Nielsen V. Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). … Under Article V of the act, any company which proposes to operate in a municipality is required to obtain a municipal consent before it may seek a certificate of approval from the Board. N.J.S.A. 48:5A-22.

Widdis v. RETIREMENT SYSTEM

238 N.J. Super. 70 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1990

Although due deference is generally accorded to the Board's interpretation of the applicable pension laws by the agency charged with their administration, Mayflower Securities Co. v. … As we recognized in Masse , [ v.

Walinski v. Mayor & Council

25 N.J. Super. 122 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1953

Passarella v. Board of Commissioners, 1 N. J. Super. 313 (App. Div. 1949); Cino v. Driscoll, 130 N. J. L. 535 (Sup. Ct. 1943). The case of William Vassos and Charles Murphy, trading as Golden Moon v. … See also State v. Reade, 98 N. J. L. 596 (Sup. Ct. 1923); State v. Williams, 30 N. J. L. 102 (Sup. Ct. 1862); Houtsch v. Jersey City, 29 N. J. L. 316 (Sup. Ct. 1861); Richards v. Bayonne, 61 N. J. L. 496 (Sup.

State v. Rolon

400 N.J. Super. 608 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 2008

See State v. … We relied upon the holding in Riley in the factually similar case of State v. Brown.

Nigito v. Borough of Closter

142 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 2, 1976

Super. 1 (1976) 359 A.2d 521 PAUL NIGITO AND WILLIAM KOESTNER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER, DEFENDANT. … See, e.g., Inganamort v. Fort Lee, 62 N.J. 521 (1973).

Harsen v. Bd. of Ed. of West Milford Tp.

132 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1975

Craster v. Board of Commissioners of City of Newark, 9 N.J. 225 (1952). … School v. Finne, 88 N.J.

Hartmann v. Maplewood School Transportation Co.

109 N.J. Super. 497 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1970

HARTMANN, IND., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MAPLEWOOD SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, BOARD OF EDUCATION, TOWNSHIPS OF MAPLEWOOD AND SOUTH ORANGE, AND T. WILLIAM VAIL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Braff argued the cause for respondent, Board of Education, Township of Maplewood and South Orange ( Messrs. Braff, Litvak & Ertag, attorneys). PER CURIAM.

Hochberg v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BOROUGH, FREEHOLD

40 N.J. Super. 271 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1956

COLE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FREEHOLD, WALTER J. SCHIVEREA AND FREEHOLD RACING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … We agree with the trial court that the determination of the board here clearly exceed the authority conferred upon it. As the court said *273 in Gerkin v. Village of Ridgewood, 17 N.J. Super. 472, 479 ( App.

In Re Portugal

44 N.J. Super. 7 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 18, 1957

Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists, above, 5 N.J., at pages 422-423; New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. M.H. Harris, Inc., 14 N.J. Super. 66, 69 ( App. … Although it was said in Weston v. New Jersey State Board of Optometrists, above, 32 N.J. Super., at page 509 ( App.

Bergen County PBA Local 134 v. Donovan

436 N.J. Super. 187 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 30, 2014

Kingsley v. Wes Outdoor Adver. Co., 55 N.J. 336, 339 , 262 A.2d 193 (1970); State by State Highway Comm’r v. Dilley, 48 N.J. 383, 387 , 226 *200 A.2d 1 (1967); Goff v. Hunt, 6 N.J. 600, 607, 80 A.2d 104 (1951); Scott v. … Twp. of Middletown v.

Furlong v. BD. OF COM'RS OF THE TOWN OF NUTLEY

15 N.J. Super. 541 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1951

FURLONG, PLAINTIFF, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWN OF NUTLEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND FLORENCE E. RUTAN, TOWN CLERK, DEFENDANTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … Crater v. County of Somerset, 123 N.J.L. 407 ( E. & A. 1939). R.S. 40:74-9 et seq. was reenacted and made a part of the revision of 1937.

Far-Gold Constr. Co. v. Borough of Chatham

141 N.J. Super. 164 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 3, 1976

Englewood, 51 N.J. 108 (1968), Beech Forest Hills, Inc. v. Morris Plains, 127 N.J. Super. 574 (App. Div. 1974) and Washington Market Enterprises v. … Kingston East Realty Co. v. State of N.J., 133 N.J. Super. 234, 239 (App. Div. 1975); E. Rutherford Industrial Park v. State, 119 N.J.

Krul v. BD. OF ADJ. OF BAYONNE

122 N.J. Super. 18 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1972

Super. 18 (1972) 298 A.2d 308 JACK KRUL, t/a UNITED ROOFING & SHEET METAL CO., PLAINTIFF, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division. … Fischer v. Fischer, 13 N.J. 162 (1953); Wene v. Meyner, 13 N.J. 185 (1953); Wright v. Vogt, 7 N.J. 1 (1951); San-Lan Builders, Inc. v. Baxendale, 28 N.J. 148 (1958). As noted in Alexander v. N.J.

Burke v. Kenny

9 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 20, 1950

BURKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. v. JOHN F. KENNY, DONALD SPENCE, LOUIS MESSANO, CHARLES WITKOWSKI, JAMES F. MURRAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JAMES A. … Davis v. Davis, 57 N.J. Law 80, 30 A. 184 ( Sup. Ct. 1894); Manahan v. Watts, 64 N.J.L. 465 , 45 A. 813 ( Sup. Ct. 1900); Dunham v. Bright, 85 N.J.L. 391 , 90 A. 255 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); Florey v.

Edgeboro, Inc. v. East Brunswick Township

31 N.J. Super. 238 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1954

It is not contended that the Hast Brunswick Board of Health has at any time exercised the statutory power to adopt any ordinance, rule or regulation relating to dumping, as did the board of health in Earruso v. … Barruso v. Board of Health, East Hanover Twp., 120 N. J. L. 463, 469 (Sup. Ct. 1938). The Legislature has granted municipal governing bodies and boards of health ample power to deal with the problem. N. J. S.

Sayreville v. Pennsylvania RR Co.

44 N.J. Super. 172 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 1957

Co. v. Public Utility Commission, 346 U.S. 346 , 74 S.Ct. 92 , 98 L.Ed. 51 (1953). True, citing its previous holding in Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. … See also New Jersey Highway Authority v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, 21 N.J. 157, 166 (1956); Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 13 N.J. Super. 540, 549 ( App.

Miller v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CTY., HUDSON

16 N.J. Super. 457 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 6, 1951

Kero, Inc., v. Terminal Construction Corp., 6 N.J. 361, 373 (1951). If we were to consider the question, the comments of Mr. Justice Case in Boyle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Passaic County, 120 N.J.L. 552 ( Sup. … We quote the language of Chief Justice Beasley, in the case of Cowenhoven v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 44 N.J.L. 232 ( Sup.

Belousofsky v. BD. OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF LINDEN

54 N.J. Super. 219 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 25, 1959

Super. 219 (1959) 148 A.2d 632 IRVING BELOUSOFSKY, TRADING AS BLANCKE ELECTRIC CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LINDEN, ETC., AND FELIX C. HEICK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Hillside Township v. Sternin, supra. Cf., Case v. Inhabitants of Trenton, 76 N.J.L. 696 ( E. & A. 1909); Armitage v. City of Newark, 86 N.J.L. 5 ( Sup. Ct. 1914); Tufano v.

In Re Carluccio

426 N.J. Super. 15 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 25, 2012

Div.), certif. denied, 149 N.J. 141 , 693 A. 2d 110 (1997) (Lottery Commission license); *926 Bevacqua v. … It is axiomatic that the Parole Board's interpretation of the statute was entitled to some deference. See, e.g., Wnuck v. N.J.