Case law

GLENN CIRIPOMPA VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF BOUND BROOK, SOMERSET COUNTY (NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 2021

Self v. Bd. of Rev., 91 N.J. 453, 460 (App. Div. 1982). The Board's fear that plaintiff will be made "more than whole" if the Board does not deduct the unemployment benefits is baseless. … The Board's reliance on City of Newark v. Copeland, 171 N.J. Super. 571 (App. Div. 1980), and Willis v. Dyer, 163 N.J. Super. 152 (App.

Esposito v. POL. AND FIREMAN'S

358 N.J. Super. 112 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 7, 2003

In 1985, the Court issued a decision in three consolidated cases, Kane v. Board of Trs., P.F.R.S., Canastra v. Board of Trs., P.F.R.S., and Minner v. … Quigley v. Board of Trs. of Pub. Employees' Ret.

Nigro v. Planning Bd.

237 N.J. Super. 305 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1989

Super. 305 (1989) 567 A.2d 1010 JAMES NIGRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 6, 1989. … Streets which appear on a planning board approved plat are sufficient, ibid., but by implication such streets are intended to fill out the skeleton, not conflict with it. See Levin v.

State v. Yormark

117 N.J. Super. 315 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1971

Brown argued the cause for appellant Milton Yormark ( Mr. Irving I. Vogelman on the brief; Messrs. Brown, Vogelman, Morris & Ashley, attorneys). Mr. Arthur J. … Brown to speak to the juror on behalf of Mulvaney. A Dr. Brown had previously testified as a character witness for that defendant.

Lipschitz v. State

43 N.J. Super. 522 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1957

Super. 522 (1957) 129 A.2d 310 NATHAN LIPSCHITZ, PLAINTIFF, v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Considered February 11, 1957. … See Lipschitz v. State, 43 N.J. Super. 386 ( App.

Thompson v. BD. OF ED., MILLVILLE

20 N.J. Super. 419 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1952

Johnson v. Board of Education, 102 N.J.L. 606 ( E. & A. 1926); McKnight v. Cassady, 113 N.J.L. 565 ( E. & A. 1934); Barnett v. … Ct. 1937); Selph v. Morristown, 16 N.J. Misc. 19 ( Sup. Ct. 1938); Falcone v. Board of Education, Newark, 17 N.J. Misc. 75 ( Cty. Ct. 1939); Kane v. Board of Education of Montclair, 20 N.J. Misc. 7 ( Sup.

In Re Carlson

174 N.J. Super. 603 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1980

Cattani v. Board of Trustees, 69 N.J. 578, 583 (1976). … O'Keefe v. Board of Trustees, 131 N.J.L. 502 (Sup.Ct. 1944), aff'd o.b. 132 N.J.L. 416 (E. & A. 1945).

Bd. of Educ. of Rancocas v. Nj Bd.

364 N.J. Super. 623 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 11, 2003

Super. 623 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE RANCOCAS VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, BURLINGTON COUNTY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION—State of New Jersey, William L. … Wilbert v. DeCamp, 72 N.J.Super. 60, 72 , 178 A. 2d 85, 92 (App.Div.1962).

State v. Besson

110 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 27, 1970

In Burnside v. … Blackwell v. Issaquena County Board of Education, 363 F. 2d 749 (5 Cir.1966). Such was the situation that occurred at Roselle's Abraham Clark High School on January 14, 1970.

Rene v. Phillips

94 N.J. Super. 102 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1967

In Myers v. Cave, 55 N. J. Super. 185 App. Div. 1959 ), we held: “No matter what may legitimately be regarded as unclear or debatable about section 14 of the act [N. J. S. … Douglas v. Harris, 35 N. J. 270, 280 (1961). Here the physician’s statement which accompanied the notice of intention filed with the Board recited that Mrs.

Bryan v. Department of Corrections

258 N.J. Super. 546 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 1992

Nieder v. Royal Indemnity Ins. Co., 62 N.J. 229, 234 , 300 A. 2d 142 (1973). … See County of Gloucester v.

Widdis v. RETIREMENT SYSTEM

238 N.J. Super. 70 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1990

Although due deference is generally accorded to the Board's interpretation of the applicable pension laws by the agency charged with their administration, Mayflower Securities Co. v. … As we recognized in Masse , [ v.

Villari v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

277 N.J. Super. 130 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 1994

Super. 130 (1994) 649 A.2d 98 JOSEPH VILLARI AND SJ VILLARI LIVESTOCK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF DEPTFORD AND DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. … Ibid.; Camara v. Board of Adjustment of Township of Belleville, 239 N.J. Super. 51, 56 , 570 A. 2d 1012 (App.Div. 1990).

State v. Williams

110 N.J. Super. 64 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 5, 1969

In State v. Homer, 86 N. J. Super. 351, 364 (App. … We specifically pointed out in State v. Campisi, 47 N. J. Super. 455, 459 (App. Div. 1957) [certification denied 26 N.

McCartney v. Franco

82 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 1964

Broadway National Bank of Bayonne v. Parking Authority of Bayonne, 40 N. J. 227, 235 (1963); Loboda v. Clark Tp., 40 N. J. 424, 429 (1963); Myers v. Cedar Grove Tp., 36 N. J. 51, 56 (1961). However, N. J. S. … Sutherland v. Board of Street and Water Commissioners of Jersey City, 61 N. J. L. 436 (Sup. Ct. 1898). The abolition of a position under the Faulkner Act was considered in Chirichella v. Dept. of Civil Service, 31 N. J.

In Re CR

364 N.J. Super. 263 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 17, 2003

Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Susan Brown-Peitz, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Ellen J. … On August 12, 2002, the CPRB stated: "CPR Board disagrees with [C.R.]'s placement. Board feels it would be in child's best interests to be placed with her siblings in the [Green] home."

Block 268, LLC v. City of Hoboken Rent Leveling and Stabilization Bd.

401 N.J. Super. 563 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 12, 2008

Super. 563 BLOCK 268, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. … Because State law preempted this field, the City and the Board cannot exercise a power that contradicts the policy established by the Legislature. State v.

Bleznak v. Township of Evesham

170 N.J. Super. 216 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 16, 1979

Fahey v. Jersey City, 52 N.J. 103, 107 (1968); Springfield Tp. v. Union Cty. Park Comm'n, 163 N.J. Super. 332 (Law Div. 1978). Those words provide the protection which plaintiffs claim. … This court may not impose limitations when the board imposed none. *220 This matter proceeds by motion for summary judgment and is capable of final disposition under the rule of Judson v.

Harsen v. Bd. of Ed. of West Milford Tp.

132 N.J. Super. 365 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1975

Craster v. Board of Commissioners of City of Newark, 9 N.J. 225 (1952). … School v. Finne, 88 N.J.

In re Individual Health Coverage Program Final Administrative Orders Nos. 96-01 & 96-22

302 N.J. Super. 360 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1997

Also instructive is New Jersey State Bar Ass’n v. … The orders were supported by the undisputed facts and the IHC Board’s conclusion did not violate the legislative policy expressed in the IHC Act. See *371 Campbell v.