Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

0.83s

  • Moore v. Hafeeza

    212 N.J. Super. 399 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 29, 1986

    Washington v. Gould, 39 N.J. 527 (1963). And the question is whether this plaintiff was in privity with the board. … As said in McFadden v.

    Disapproved in part by L.V. v. R.S., 347 N.J. Super. 33 (2002)Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Wharton v. Knox

    98 N.J. Super. 61 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 24, 1967

    WHARTON, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. FLOYD KNOX, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22, 33-35 (1956).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Quigley v. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERV., LLC

    400 N.J. Super. 494 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 19, 2008

    Sperry v. Florida, 373 U.S. 379 , 83 S.Ct. 1322 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 428 (1963). … The cases upon which defendant relies, such as Macedo v. Dello Russo, 178 N.J. 340, 345-46 , 840 A. 2d 238 (2004) and *673 Plemmons v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Tp. of Wayne v. Robbie's, Inc.

    118 N.J. Super. 129 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 1972

    In Giordano v. … Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 (1954); N.J.S.A. 54:4-2.25.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lopez v. Patel

    407 N.J. Super. 79 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 7, 2009

    Super. 79 Tito LOPEZ and Daphne Lopez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Tushar PATEL and William Brown, Defendants-Respondents, and Janie B. Nail, Defendant. No. A-5262-07T3 Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Kazin, 81 N.J. 85, 94 , 405 A. 2d 360 (1979)) (quoting Brown v. Brown, 274 Cal.App. 2d 178, 189 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 238, 244-45 (1969)).]

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • KIRK C. NELSON VS. ELIZABETH BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-1377-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 26, 2021

    Relying on Cohen v. … The Board further relies on Coyle v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 170 N.J. 260 (2002), and Taylor v. Board of Education, 187 N.J. Super. 546 (App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SERGIO MARTINS VS. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD (C-000141-18, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 11, 2020

    A prior owner, Ravenell Williams, acquired Parcel C from Mary Brown in 1959. … During the public hearing, the Planning Board would not allow the application to move forward unless the condition was removed from Parcels A and B. Relying on Soussa v. Denville Twp. Planning Bd., 238 N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • AMERICAN HYDRO v. Clifton City

    239 N.J. Super. 130 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 23, 1989

    Ritter Company v. … In Duke Power Co., v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Obst v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

    123 N.J. Super. 60 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 1, 1973

    According to Exum v. Marrow, 112 N. J. … Proskurnja v. Elder, 73 N. J. Super. 466 (Law Div. 1962). See, also, the case of Lascari v. Iannaci, 56 N. J. 317 (1970). This distinction is made under the uninsured motorist endorsement. 7.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Application of Trignani

    13 N.J. Super. 306 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 1951

    App., Cal. 1929); Brewer v. Goff, 138 F. 2 d 710 ( C.C.A. 10, 1943). … Huff v. Ayers, 6 N.J. Super. 380 ( App. Div. 1950).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • RIVER DELL ED. ASSOC. v. River Dell Bd. of Ed.

    122 N.J. Super. 350 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1973

    Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183 , 73 S.Ct. 215 , 97 L.Ed. 216 (1952); Sweezy v. … The recent case of James v. Board of Education, 461 F. 2d 566 (2 Cir.1972), is directly on point.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tartaglio v. Dept. of Institutions & Agencies

    102 N.J. Super. 592 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 19, 1968

    In re Masiello, 25 N.J. 590 (1958); New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Board of Review, 25 N.J. 235 (1957). … Misc. 180 , 52 A. 2 d 564 ( Ch. 1947), and Falzo v. Falzo, 84 N.J. Super. 343 ( App. Div. 1964). Compare Paragian v. Paragian, 48 N.J. Super. 207, 209-213 ( J. & D.R. Ct. 1957), and Williamson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferraro v. Zoning Bd. of Keansburg

    321 N.J. Super. 288 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1999

    Super. 288 Guy FERRARO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ZONING BOARD OF the BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG and The Borough of Keansburg, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 5, 1999. … See Cox, New Jersey Zoning and Land Use Administration Sec. 11-2.3 (GANN, 1999); Ianieri v. East Brunswick Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 192 N.J.Super. 15, 20 , 468 A. 2d 1072 (Law Div. 1983).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Port of New York Authority v. City of Newark

    35 N.J. Super. 74 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 25, 1955

    It *80 cites New Jersey Turnpike Authority, v. Washington Township, 16 N. … The question before the court in New Jersey Turnpike Authority v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kernbach v. Kernbach

    174 N.J. Super. 544 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 22, 1980

    Defendant cited Reed v. … The assignment provides the board broad leeway to institute suit for the recovery of sums of assistance extended, the rights to which it has validly and in good faith been assigned. Bergen Cty. Welfare Bd. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hasbrouck Hts. Hospital Ass'n v. Hasbrouck Hts.

    27 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 8, 1953

    Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N.J. 200, 206 (1949); State v. Mundet Cork Corp., 8 N.J. 359 (1952); Welsh v. Morristown, 98 N.J.L. 630, 634 ( Sup. Ct. 1923), affirmed Welsh v. … Cobble Close Farm v. Board of Adjustment of Middletown Tp., 10 N.J. 442, 451 (1952); Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Ocean Township, supra ; State v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Hasbrouck Heights Hospital Ass'n v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights, 15 N.J. 447 (1954)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Matter of Cahill

    245 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 25, 1991

    The Merit System Board accepted the ALJ's findings of fact but rejected his conclusions and recommendations. The board found that dismissal was the appropriate action. … Whitlock v. Donovan, 598 F. Supp. 126, 134 (D.D.C. 1984), aff'd sub nom. Whitlock v. Brock, 790 F. 2d 964 (D.C. Cir.1986); Callicotte v. Carlucci, 698 F. Supp. 944, 949-50 (D.D.C. 1988).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • PLEASANTVILLE BD. OF EDUCATION v. Aiken

    69 N.J. Super. 70 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 2, 1961

    Super. 70 (1961) 173 A.2d 527 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE, IN THE COUNTY OF ATLANTIC AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. EARLE R. … In short, these funds were part of a general appropriation to the Board of Education to be spent for the purposes as the Board itself felt needed. In addition, Hartford cites Damato v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Bergen Cty. Welfare Bd.

    122 N.J. Super. 371 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 1973

    Super. 371 (1973) 300 A.2d 575 VIRGINIA THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BERGEN COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued January 3, 1973. … See Battaglia v. Wayne Tp. Planning Board, 98 N.J. Super. 194, 202 (App. Div. 1967); Florham Park Invest. Assocs. v. Madison Planning Bd., 92 N.J. Super. 598, 603-604 (Law Div. 1966). See also, Nolan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kohrherr v. Ferreira

    215 N.J. Super. 123 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 13, 1987

    In Burd v. … In Burd v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.