Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

2.04s

  • Passaic v. Passaic Industrial Center, Inc.

    59 N.J. Super. 174 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 22, 1960

    Passaic v. Gera Mills, 30 N.J. 153 . … . * * *" And see Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hulbert v. Collins

    22 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 17, 1952

    HULBERT, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. J. PALMER COLLINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 29, 1952. … Grobart v. Society for Establishing Useful *220 Manufactures, 2 N.J. 136 (1949); Brown v. Brown, 2 N.J. 252 , (1949); Volker v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 11 N.J. Super. 225 ( App. Div. 1951). Affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the General Election in Bethlehem Township

    74 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 28, 1962

    The policy o£ the courts in election matters has been stated in Wene v. Meyner, 13 N. … See also, Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N. J. 435, 440 (1952); In re Moore, above, 57 N. J. Super. 244 (App. Div. 1959).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • J.A.W. v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. (STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 2, 2022

    The Board also stated, relying on Widdis v. Pub. Emp. Ret. Sys., 238 N.J. Super. 70, 80 (App. … Frank v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In re the Analysis of Walsh Trucking Occupancy & Sprinkler System

    215 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 19, 1987

    Keyes Martin & Co. v. Director, Division of Purchase & Property, supra, 99 N.J. at 261 ; Burton v. Sills, supra, 53 N.J. at 91 . … See, e.g., New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In the Matter of the Application of Y.L. to Practice Massage and Bodywork Therapy in the State of New Jersey

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 2014

    So long as the Board's decision is supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record and was neither "arbitrary, capricious, [nor] unreasonable," it will be affirmed. Brady v. … (quoting Self v. Bd. of Review, 91 N.J. 453, 459 (1982)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jersey City Incinerator Authority v. Department of Public Utilities of New Jersey

    146 N.J. Super. 243 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 30, 1976

    Miller v. Hudson Cty. Bd. of Freeholders, 10 N. J. 398, 413 (1952); Barringer v. Miele, 6 N. J. 139, 144 (1951); State v. Moresh, 122 N. J. L. 77, 79 (E. & A. 1939); cf. Closter Service Stations, Inc. v. … In that ease and in the case of Pleasure Bay Apts. v. Long Branch, 66 N.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hunterdon County Democrat, Inc. v. Recorder Publishing Co.

    117 N.J. Super. 552 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 10, 1971

    Vickers v. Board of Com’rs, 77 Mont. 316 , 250 P. 606, 608 (Sup. Ct. 1926). … The most recent reported case is Schultz v. Board of Education Wanaque, 105 N. J. Super. 165 (App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mason v. CITY OF PATERSON

    120 N.J. Super. 184 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 6, 1972

    The statutes in question distributed powers formerly exercised by the Board of Aldermen to newly created boards. Grosso v. Paterson, 55 N.J. Super. 164, 170 (Law Div. 1959). … Its unique quality was recognized in Fielding v. Board of Ed., Paterson, 76 N.J. Super. 50 -57 (Ch.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Chrinko v. S. BRUNSWICK TP. PLANNING BD.

    77 N.J. Super. 594 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1963

    RAUCH, PLAINTIFFS, v. … Full consideration by the planning board within less than 30 days suffices to meet the statute. Wollen v. Ft. Lee, 27 N.J. 408, 417 (1958); Vickers Tp. v. Gloucester Tp., 37 N.J. 232, 252 (1962).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • MacPhail v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO.

    6 N.J. Super. 613 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1950

    Super. 613 (1950) 70 A.2d 508 WILLIAM MacPHAIL AND WILLIAM BRADFORD, PLAINTIFFS, v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF HUDSON COUNTY AND FRANK J. FARLEY, COUNTY TREASURER, DEFENDANTS. … See McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 99 N.J.L. 393 ( E. & A. 1924).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fairweather v. EMPLOYEES'RET. SYS.

    373 N.J. Super. 288 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 2004

    Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A. 2d 1213 (1988) and Ciecwisz v. … See Outland v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, 326 N.J.Super. 395, 400 , 741 A.2d 612, 615 (App.Div.1999) (citing P.F. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re New Jersey & New York Railroad Co.

    23 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 18, 1952

    the principle established in O'Connor v. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 127 N.J.L. 164 ( Sup. Ct. 1941); N.J. Power & Light Co. v. Butler, 4 N.J. Super. 270 ( App. Div. 1949).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Delbridge v. Jann Holding Company

    164 N.J. Super. 506 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 26, 1978

    See Hudson v. Hudson, 36 N.J. 549, 552-553 (1962); Petersen v. Falzarano, 6 N.J. 447, 453 (1951); Frantzen v. Howard, 132 N.J. Super. 226, 227 (App. Div. 1975); Kerr v. Kerr, 129 N.J. Super. 291, 293 (App. … Brown v. Brown, 147 N.J. Super. 156, 157 (App. Div. 1977).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Erie RR Co. v. BD. OF PUB. UTIL. COMM'RS

    64 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1960

    Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs, 37 *484 N.J.L. 438 ( Sup. Ct. 1915), reversed on other grounds 90 N.J.L. 271 ( E. & A. 1916); Erie R. Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com'rs, 89 N.J.L. 57, 91 ( Sup. … Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mayer v. Bd. of Adjustment of Town of Montclair

    56 N.J. Super. 296 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 26, 1959

    San-Lan Builders, Inc. v. Baxendale, 28 N.J. 148 (1958); Roselle v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Moonachie, 48 N.J. Super. 17, 21 ( App. Div. 1957); 49 N.J. Super. 35 ( App. Div. 1958). … See Eastern Scrap & Salvage Corp. v. Burns, 5 N.J. Super. 616 ( Law Div. 1949); Grace Iron & Steel Corp. v. Ackerman, 123 N.J.L. 54 ( Sup. Ct. 1939).

    Reversed on other grounds by Mayer v. TOWN OF MONTCLAIR BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, 32 N.J. 130 (1960)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF PFRS

    322 N.J. Super. 477 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 20, 1998

    Decisions rendered in New York in comparable circumstances support the Board's decision. In Holly v. … In In Re Martone v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fasching v. Kallinger

    211 N.J. Super. 26 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 30, 1986

    See Neiman v. Hurff, 11 N.J. 55 (1952); Riggs v. Palmer, 115 N.Y. 506 , 22 N.E. 188 (1889); Merrity v. Prudential Ins. Co., 110 N.J.L. 414 (E. & A. 1933); Whitney v. Lott, 134 N.J. Eq. 586 (Chan. 1944). … In Canino v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • ZUDHI KARAGJOZI VS. DAMON RISUCCI (L-2127-15, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 2019

    A-3735-17T1 ZUDHI KARAGJOZI and LYSBETH KARAGJOZI, JOHN RYAN and KAREN RYAN, and DOUGLAS BROWN and KATHY BROWN, Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Respondents, v. DAMON RISUCCI and MRS. … board.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • MacLeod v. City of Hoboken

    330 N.J. Super. 502 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 5, 2000

    To the contrary, the Van Deckers' challenge to their added assessment was initiated with an appeal to the county board of taxation. Id. at 359 , 576 A.2d 881 . See also Corrado v. Township of Montclair, 18 N.J. … Roadway Express, Inc. v. Kingsley, 37 N.J. 136, 140 , 179 A. 2d 729 (1962). This is especially true when the nature of the dispute calls upon the county board's expertise in property valuation. City of East Orange v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.