Case law

Ballurio v. Castellini

29 N.J. Super. 383 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1954

Hardy v. Greene, supra , are State ex rel. Weber v. Board of Trustees, 123 Wis. 245 , 101 N.W. 373 ( Sup. Ct. 1904), and MacIntyre v. Retirement Board, etc., 42 Cal. App. 2 d 734, 109 P. 2 d 962 ( D. Ct. … Kirby v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 129 Conn. 419 , 29 A. 2 d 452 ( Sup. Ct. Err. 1942), and Bullock v. Spencer, 112 F. Supp. 147 ( D.C. 1953).

Cranford Development Associates, LLC v. Township of Cranford

445 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 26, 2016

Tumpson v. Farina, 218 N.J. 450, 473 (2014). … v. Bernards Township, 103 N.J. 1, 54 (1986)).

Lawrenceville Garden Apartments v. Lawrence Township

14 N.J. Tax 285 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 11, 1994

before the Board. … Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985), clearly treats the filing deadlines for tax appeals as jurisdictional in nature and we are compelled to follow that doctrine here.

Ranchlands, Inc. v. Township of Stafford

305 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1997

Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Comm, of Raritan Tp., 39 N.J. 1,13 , 186 A.2d 489 (1962); see also Summer Cottagers’ Ass’n v. City of Cape May, 19 N.J. 493, 504 , 117 A.2d 585 (1955); Vogt v. … O’Malley v. Department of Energy, 109 N.J. 309, 316 , 537 A.2d 647 (1987) (citations omitted). Equitable estoppel is applied “only in very compelling circumstances,” Township of Fairfield v.

State v. Neal

361 N.J. Super. 522 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 16, 2003

and (2) whether he was aware of a board policy concerning reimbursement for expenditures by members of the Board. … In Braeutigam v.

Township of Fairfield v. Likanchuk's

274 N.J. Super. 320 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 22, 1994

Urban v. Planning Board of Manasquan, 124 N.J. 651, 656 , 592 A. 2d 240 (1991). … The Jantausch principles were applied in Hill v. Board of Adjust. Borough of Eatontown, 122 N.J.

D. Giordano Sons v. Ciliberti

22 N.J. Super. 179 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 9, 1952

In the case of Losick v. … See the case of Dornbusch v. Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, 180 A. 552 ( Sup.

City of North Wildwood v. North Wildwood Taxpayers' Ass'n

338 N.J. Super. 155 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 27, 2000

Board Chosen Freeholders v. State, 159 N.J. 565, 582 , 732 A.2d 1053 (1999). … Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State, supra, 159 N.J. at 582 , 732 A.2d 1053 (citing Gormley, 88 N.J. at 37 , 438 A.2d 519 ).

In re the Suspension or Revocation of the License of Blum

109 N.J. Super. 125 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1970

See State Board of Medical Examiners v. Kempkes, 10 N. J. Misc. 838 (Sup. Ct. 1932), and concurring opinion of Judge (now Justice) Brennan in In re Larsen, 17 N. J. Super. 564, 575 (App. Div. 1952). … State v. Costa, 11 N. J. 239, 247 (1953).

State v. Smith

374 N.J. Super. 425 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 2005

State v. … Brown, supra, 352 N.J.Super. at 353 , 800 A.2d at 197 .

Schack v. Trimble

48 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 12, 1957

Goddard v. County Board of Elections, 27 N. J. Super. 30, 33 (App. Dir. 1953). … Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate City, 3 N. J. 200 (1949); Peterson v. Board of Adjustment of the Town of Montclair, 7 N. J. Super. 282 (App. Div. 1950).

Thanet Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. OF TP. OF PRINCETON

108 N.J. Super. 65 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 22, 1969

Aviation Services, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, Hanover Tp., 20 N.J. 275, 282 (1956). … See Carroll v. Board of Adjustment, Jersey City, 15 N.J. Super. 363 ( App. Div. 1951); cf. Chicago v. L.J. Sheridan & Co., 18 Ill. App. 2 d 57, 151 N.E. 2 d 451 (Ct.

State by Com'r of Transp. v. F & J.

250 N.J. Super. 19 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 5, 1991

App. 3d 790 , 13 *28 Ill.Dec. 604, 608, 371 N.E. 2d 321, 325 (App.Ct. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct. 282 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 258 (1978); Board of Educ., Unified School Dist. 464 v. … F & J's purpose in seeking site plan approval was not an issue before the Board and thus the Board's action could not foreclose the court's adjudication of that issue. See Alessandra v. Gross, 187 N.J.

Simeone v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

377 N.J. Super. 417 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 17, 2005

Super. 417 Christopher SIMEONE and Eleanor Braun, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER, Defendant-Respondent. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … We now consider the Law Division's affirmance of the Board action. A zoning board's decision on a variance may be set aside only when arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable. Cell South v.

Caltavuturo v. Passaic

124 N.J. Super. 361 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 1973

Latzoni v. Garfield, 22 N.J. 84, 92 (1956); Harpell v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, 20 N.J. 309, 316 (1956). … See Coleman v. Edison Tp., 95 N.J. Super. 600, 605 (App. Div. 1967). We find Fahey v.

Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Ford

172 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 3, 1979

Co. v. Brown, 321 F. Supp. 309 (N.D.Ga. 1971). The court there relied on the general rule cited above and, in support of its position, cited the following language from 83 C.J.S. … Brown, supra , to be persuasive and thus chooses to follow the general rule which would preclude a subrogee from pursuing a punitive damage claim. 73 Am.Jur. 2d, Subrogation, supra.

Mintz v. Township of Millstone

374 N.J. Super. 396 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2005

Palamarg Realty Co. v. Rehac, 80 N.J. 446, 456 , 404 A.2d 21 (1979). … Aldrich v. Schwartz, 258 N.J.Super. 300 , 609 A.2d 507 (App.Div.1992), upon which the board and Orliek greatly rely, presents a similar problem.

LP v. Edison Bd. of Educ.

265 N.J. Super. 266 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 1993

See, N.J.A.C. 6:28-2.7(g); see also, C.S. v. Middletown Township Board of Education, 259 N.J. … Sec. 1415 (e)(2); Lascari v. Board of Educ. 116 N.J. 30, 37 , 560 A. 2d 1180 (1989); C.S. v.

River Vale v. E & R OFF. INTERIORS

241 N.J. Super. 391 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1990

Super. 391 (1990) 575 A.2d 55 RIVER VALE PLANNING BOARD AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. … Under these circumstances, the board may, if it desires, rescind the site plan approval and variance. Cf. Costanza & Bertolino, Inc. v.

Shanahan v. NJ State Bd. of Education

118 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1972

SHANAHAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; CARL L. MARBURGER, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR STATE OF NEW JERSEY; NORMAN A. … to the secretary of the board of education.