Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Shanahan v. NJ State Bd. of Education

    118 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1972

    SHANAHAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; CARL L. MARBURGER, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR STATE OF NEW JERSEY; NORMAN A. … to the secretary of the board of education.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCue v. Antisell

    105 N.J. Super. 128 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 14, 1969

    Rhinesmith v. Goodfellow, 111 N.J.L. 604, 606 ( E. & A. 1933); Hayter v. Benner, 67 N.J.L. 359, 360 ( Sup. Ct. 1902); and see Kohler v. … See DeFeo v. Smith, 17 N.J. 183, 190 (1955). In appropriate circumstances, moreover, he will be afforded an opportunity to choose which office he will accept and which reject. McDonough v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pomanowski v. Monmouth Cty. Bd. of Realtors

    175 N.J. Super. 212 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 11, 1980

    In United States v. … While the decision of Collins v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sagarese v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NJ

    7 N.J. Super. 63 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 21, 1950

    SAGARESE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OF NEW JERSEY AND THE BOARD OF HEALTH OF THE TOWN OF MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … Shibla v. Wall Township, 136 N.J.L. 506 ( Sup. Ct. 1948), affirmed, 137 N.J.L. 692 ( E. & A. 1948). The judgment is reversed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Horner v. TP. COMMITTEE OF TP. OCEAN

    175 N.J. Super. 533 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 3, 1980

    Ream v. Kuhlman, 112 N.J. Super. 175, 190 (App.Div. 1970). … State v. Ulesky, 54 N.J. *541 26, 29 (1969). In Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • STATE EX REL. BD. OF HEALTH v. Sommers Rendering Co.

    66 N.J. Super. 334 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 27, 1961

    Board of Health of Lyndhurst v. United Cork Co., 116 N.J. Eq. 4 ( Ch. 1934), affirmed 117 N.J. Eq. 437 ( E. & A. 1935); Board of Health of Caldwell v. Shaw, 113 N.J. Eq. 507 ( Ch. 1933); Board of Health of Irvington v. … As pointed out in Board of Health of Rivervale v. Annett, 1 N.J. Super. 503 ( Ch.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Penn-Texas Corp. v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.

    34 N.J. Super. 373 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 1955

    Miller v. Cummings, 72 N.Y. 433 ( Ct. … See also Nathan v. Tompkins, 82 Ala. 437 , 2 So. 747 ( Sup. Ct. 1886); Walsh v. State ex rel. Cook, 199 Ala. 123 , 74 So. 45 , 2 A.L.R. 551 ( Ala. Sup. Ct. 1917); Mottu v. Primrose, 23 Md. 482 (1865); Gries v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re Malone

    381 N.J. Super. 344 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 2005

    The Board contends that its decision in this matter should be accorded substantial deference and not reversed unless it is arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or unsupported by credible evidence in the record. Brady v. … Further, we disagree with the Board's rejection of the additional information about billing rates that Mr. Wallach submitted to the Board at its request. The Board criticized Mr.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Builders League of South Jersey, Inc. v. BURLINGTON CTY. PLANNING BD.

    353 N.J. Super. 4 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2002

    Relying correctly on Palatine I v. Planning Board of Montville, *392 133 N.J. 546, 553-54 , 628 A. 2d 321 (1993), as well as William M. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Homes of Hope, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

    236 N.J. Super. 584 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 10, 1989

    In Kohl v. … In Medici v.

    Disagreed with by Sica v. Board of Adjustment, 246 N.J. Super. 338 (1991)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Heil

    132 N.J. Super. 283 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 31, 1975

    Super. 283 (1975) 333 A.2d 537 JOSEPH DAVIS, a/k/a JOSEPH MC EACHIN, APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS D. HEIL, CHAIRMAN, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … See also, Bonilla v. Heil, supra .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • I.W.S. Transfer Systems of N.J., Inc. v. Planning Board of the City of Garfield

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 10, 2026

    Reilly v. Brice, 109 N.J. 555, 559 (1988). … Wildwood v. Frederick, 435 N.J. Super. 552, 561-63 (App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Gallagher

    286 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 27, 1995

    In United States v. … State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 618 , 573 A. 2d 886 (1990). Consequently, we find no cause to conclude that the jury's verdict constituted a miscarriage of justice under the law. R. 2:10-1; State v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Delbridge v. Off. of Pub. Def.

    238 N.J. Super. 288 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 23, 1989

    Heisel, 361 F. 2d 581 (3 Cir.1966), cert. den. 386 U.S. 1021 , 87 S.Ct. 1367 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 457 (1967) (parole board members); Bethea v. Reid, 445 F. 2d 1163 (3 Cir.1971) (assistant U.S. Attorney); Brown v. … Miller v. Barilla, 549 F. 2d 648 (9 Cir.1977); Minns v. Paul, 542 F. 2d 899 (4 Cir.1976). The third circuit recently reaffirmed its Brown holding in Black v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.

    23 N.J. Super. 431 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 12, 1952

    Abrams, chairman of the board, who received no options. … That ratification cures any voidable defect in the action of the Board. Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms. Corp., 30 Del. Ch. 538 , 64 A. 2 d 581.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Suburban Department Stores v. East Orange

    43 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 28, 1957

    Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 32 N.J. Super. 18 ( Law Div. 1954), affirmed 16 N.J. 329 (1954). … Ct. 1876); Mayor and Alderman of Jersey City v. O'Callaghan, 41 N.J.L. 349 ( E. & A. 1879); Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Borough of Bradley Beach, 91 N.J.L. 364 ( Sup. Ct. 1918); Hahne Realty Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Essex Cty. Welfare Bd. v. DEPT. OF INST. & AGENCIES

    139 N.J. Super. 47 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 1976

    Super. 47 (1976) 352 A.2d 270 ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD, APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES AND EVYONNE YORK, RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. … See King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 , 20 L.Ed. 2d 1118 (1968); Hausman v. N.J. Dept. of Institutions and Agencies, 64 N.J. 202 (1974), cert. den. 417 U.S. 955 , 94 S.Ct. 3083 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1974).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.

    24 N.J. Super. 277 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 13, 1953

    Grant Co. v. Board of Review, supra ; Muraski v. Board of Review of U.C.C., 136 N.J.L. 472 ( Sup. … R.S. 43:21-4 ( c ); Boyer v. Board of Review, 4 N.J. Super. 143 ( App. Div. 1949); De Rose v. Board of Review, 6 N.J. Super. 164 ( App. Div. 1950); Guidice v. Board of Review of Div. of Employment Sec., 14 N.J.

    Reversed on other grounds by Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC., 13 N.J. 447 (1953)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Homes of Hope v. Eastampton Tp.

    409 N.J. Super. 330 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 24, 2009

    Burbridge v. … The trial court reversed the Board. Relying on Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Bain

    212 N.J. Super. 548 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 1986

    Morrison met in the lobby of the Sheraton with a female which I described as in her thirties with curly brown hair and that they went up to a particular room.” He subsequently stated, "Mr. … Lombardo also observed Vic and this lady companion board a plane for Fort Lauderdale.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.