Case law

In re Wilner's Livery Service, Inc.

159 N.J. Super. 226 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 26, 1978

Kuberski v. Haussermann, 113 N. J. L. 162 (Sup. Ct. 1934;) Goff v. Hunt, 6 N. J. 600 (1951) ; Henninger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County, 3 N. J. 68 (1949). [at 317] Sec also Brewer v. Porch,, 53 N. … Quaremba v. Allan, 67 N. J. 1 (1975); Malawan v. Monmouth Cty. Tax Bd., 51 N. J. 291 (1968). Interestingly, in 1973 when the Board was granted jurisdiction over charter buses, the Legislature enacted an amendment to N.

Cameron & Cameron, Inc. v. PLANNING BD. OF TOWNSHIP OF WARREN

250 N.J. Super. 296 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 5, 1991

Super. 296 (1991) 593 A.2d 1250 CAMERON & CAMERON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WARREN, SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp., 52 N.J. 348, 350 , 245 A. 2d 336 (1968); Divan Builders, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Wayne, 66 N.J. 582, 600 , 334 A. 2d 30 (1975); Brazer v.

Sprint Spect. v. Tp. Warren Plan

325 N.J. Super. 61 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 9, 1999

by our courts, see Purwin v. … In Smart SMR v.

Cronin v. Township Committee

239 N.J. Super. 611 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 22, 1990

[a] board of adjustment shall not be exercised by any other body, except as otherwise provided in this act. Cf. Bell v. Township of Bass River, 196 N.J. … The doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies requires that that determination should ordinarily be made in the first instance by the board of adjustment. Wawa Food Market v. Planning Bd., 227 N.J.

Builders League of South Jersey, Inc. v. BURLINGTON CTY. PLANNING BD.

353 N.J. Super. 4 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2002

Relying correctly on Palatine I v. Planning Board of Montville, *392 133 N.J. 546, 553-54 , 628 A. 2d 321 (1993), as well as William M. … V.

BURL. CTY. COL. FAC. ASSN. v. Bd. of Trustees

119 N.J. Super. 276 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 23, 1972

It is conceded that the Board of Higher Education does not by its rules need to approve a calendar. In Libby, McNeill & Libby v. … Joint School District No. 8, City *286 of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, etc., supra ; see also N.J.A.C. 19:12-1 to 19:12-15.

Prudential Ins. Co. v. MAYOR AND BD. OF COUNCIL OF TOWN OF GUTTENBERG

196 N.J. Super. 482 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1984

Rothman v. Rothman, 65 N.J. 219, 225 (1974). … Associates v. Brudner, 185 N.J. Super. 403, 409 (Dist.Ct. 1982), satisfies the aforementioned criterion. In I.L.F.Y. v.

Ballurio v. Castellini

29 N.J. Super. 383 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1954

Hardy v. Greene, supra , are State ex rel. Weber v. Board of Trustees, 123 Wis. 245 , 101 N.W. 373 ( Sup. Ct. 1904), and MacIntyre v. Retirement Board, etc., 42 Cal. App. 2 d 734, 109 P. 2 d 962 ( D. Ct. … Kirby v. Board of Fire Commissioners, 129 Conn. 419 , 29 A. 2 d 452 ( Sup. Ct. Err. 1942), and Bullock v. Spencer, 112 F. Supp. 147 ( D.C. 1953).

Cranford Development Associates, LLC v. Township of Cranford

445 N.J. Super. 220 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 26, 2016

Tumpson v. Farina, 218 N.J. 450, 473 (2014). … v. Bernards Township, 103 N.J. 1, 54 (1986)).

Bastas v. Bd. of Review Dep't of Labor and Ind.

155 N.J. Super. 312 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 4, 1978

We have this day held, in Pinilla v. Board of Review, 155 N.J. … Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J. Super. 46, 51 (App. Div. 1964); DiMicele v. General Motors Corp., 51 N.J. Super. 167, 171 (App. Div. 1958), aff'd 29 N.J. 427 (1959). As demonstrated in Pinilla v.

Ranchlands, Inc. v. Township of Stafford

305 N.J. Super. 528 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 20, 1997

Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Comm, of Raritan Tp., 39 N.J. 1,13 , 186 A.2d 489 (1962); see also Summer Cottagers’ Ass’n v. City of Cape May, 19 N.J. 493, 504 , 117 A.2d 585 (1955); Vogt v. … O’Malley v. Department of Energy, 109 N.J. 309, 316 , 537 A.2d 647 (1987) (citations omitted). Equitable estoppel is applied “only in very compelling circumstances,” Township of Fairfield v.

Matter of Grand Jury Subpoenas

241 N.J. Super. 18 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 15, 1989

Apparently two members of the Sussex County Board of Freeholders and the Adjuster have been advised that they are targets of the investigation and have been given the appropriate warnings. See State v. … V. We also reject the State's claim that the Lowenstein firm acted as a management-consultant and not as a lawyer in providing services to the Board.

In Re Smock

5 N.J. Super. 495 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 18, 1949

Article II, paragraph 3; Richardson v. Radics, 131 N.J.L. 406 , 37 A.2d 293 ( Sup. Ct. 1944). … Public Service, etc., Co. v. Camden, 13 N.J. Misc. 693 , 180 A. 778 ( Sup. Ct. 1935).

State v. Moultrie

357 N.J. Super. 547 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 2003

We agree with defendant that our opinion in State v. Brown, 239 N.J.Super. 635 , 571 A.2d 1367 (App.Div.1990), governs this appeal. … State v. Kelly, supra, 97 N.J. at 200 , 478 A.2d 364 ; State v.

Dinizo v. PLAN. BD. OF WRESTFIELD

312 N.J. Super. 225 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 8, 1998

Nash v. Board of Adjustment of Morris Tp., 96 N.J. 97, 102 , 474 A. 2d 241 (1984). … Corp. v.

State v. Smith

374 N.J. Super. 425 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 27, 2005

State v. … Brown, supra, 352 N.J.Super. at 353 , 800 A.2d at 197 .

Jersey City v. Armed Realty Corp.

45 N.J. Super. 49 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 25, 1957

This fact was adverted to in State Board of Assessors v. Central R. … Miller v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 10 N.J. 398, 413 (1952); cf. State v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 134 N.J.L. 34, 41 ( Sup. Ct. 1946), affirmed 135 N.J.L. 481 ( E. & A. 1947).

Coculo v. City of Trenton

85 N.J. Super. 523 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 8, 1964

In accord, see Galante v. Teaneck Dept. of Health, 70 N.J. Super. 362, 367 ( Law Div. 1961). … The extent of the control exercised by the State Board over beauty parlors may be gleaned from a reading of the statute and the comprehensive rules and regulations of the State Board adopted pursuant to R.S. 45:4A-13 and

Rite Aid of Nj v. Bd. of Pharm., Nj

124 N.J. Super. 62 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 8, 1973

Cammarata v. Essex County Park Comm'n, 26 N.J. 404, 411 (1958). … Corp. v. Sills, 93 N.J. Super. 326, 338, 341 (Ch. Div. 1966).

In re the Tenure Hearing of Doyle

201 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 14, 1985

(Mayflower Securities v. … In performing our task of determining whether the decision of the State Board is supported by sufficient credible evidence (Dore v. Bedminster Tp.